|   homepage   |   about E-LIS   |   browse   |   search   |   help   |   classification schema   |   submission guidelines   ||
| Login/Your pages | Create Account|

Use of electronic journals in a University library: does the Pareto principle work? (Спрос на электронные журналы в университетской библиотеке: работает ли правило Парето?)

Pislyakov, Vladimir Use of electronic journals in a University library: does the Pareto principle work? (Спрос на электронные журналы в университетской библиотеке: работает ли правило Парето?). Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya. Seriya 1: Organizatsiya i Metodika Informatsionnoi Raboty (Научно-техническая информация. Сер. 1: Организация и методика информационной работы), 2005, n. 12, pp. 27-32. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
567Kb Language: Russian
[img]Other
144Kb Language: Russian

Alternative Locations: http://library.hse.ru/science/papers/pareto.pdf

Abstract(s)

We consider the empiric Pareto principle (20/80 rule) that describes deviation from uniformity for various processes. The principle is applied to the use of electronic journals in a University library. We analyze 2004 usage statistics for periodicals databases (EBSCO, JSTOR, ProQuest and ScienceDirect) as well as combined data for all 4 resources. We plot demand graphs with respect to different titles and conclude that Pareto principle holds true for the use of online periodicals.

Рассматривается эмпирическое правило Парето, описывающее отклонение от равномерности, наблюдаемое в различных процессах. Правило применено к процессу использования электронных журналов в университетской библиотеке. Проанализирована статистика обращений к зарубежным периодическим изданиям из баз данных EBSCO, JSTOR, ProQuest и ScienceDirect за 2004 г., а также обобщенная статистика по всем четырем ресурсам. Построены графики распределения спроса, установлено, что правило Парето хорошо выполняется для процесса использования электронной периодики из онлайновых баз данных.

Item Type:Journal Article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords:Pareto principle, 20/80 rule, usage statistics, electronic journals
Subjects:H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
B. Information use and sociology of information. > BB. Bibliometric methods.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CA. Use studies.
Full Metadata:Show all fields
ID Code:10761
Deposited By:Pislyakov, Vladimir
Deposited On:06 Jul 2007
Last Modified:19 Nov 2008 12:56
Statistics:View statistics for this eprint

Pareto, V. (1897). Cours d'Economie Politique. Vol. 2.

Juran, J. M. (1975). The non-pareto principle; mea culpa. Qual Prog, 8(5), 8-9.

Trueswell, R. L. (1969). Some behavorial patterns of library users: The 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43(5), 458-461.

Sennyey, P., Ellern, G. D., & Newsome, N. (2002). Collection development and a long-term periodical use study: Methodology and implications. Serials Review, 28(1), 38-44.

Scigliano, M. (2000). Serial use in a small academic library: Determining cost-effectiveness. Serials Review, 26(1), 43-52.

Pitts Diedrichs, C. (2001). E-journals: The OhioLINK experience. Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services, 25(2), 191-210.

Weislogel, J. (1999). Elsevier Science Digital Libraries Symposium II: a conference report. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services. 25(4), 459–467.

Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A proposal to define a core of a scientific subject: A definition using concentration and fuzzy sets. Scientometrics, 54(1), 51-62.

Burrell, Q. L. (2003). Defining a core: Theoretical observations on the egghe-rousseau proposal. Scientometrics, 57(1), 75-92.

Pislyakov, V. V. (2002) Analysis of the content of the leading electronic resources of current foreign periodicals (Working Paper WP/2002/02). (in Russian: Писляков В. В. Анализ контента ведущих электронных ресурсов актуальной зарубежной периодики: Препринт WP/2002/02. М.: ГУ ВШЭ, 2002)

Counter Code of Practice, Release 1: http://www.projectcounter.org/code_practice.html#start, sect. 4.

Bollen, J., Van De Sompel, H., Smith, J. A., & Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1419-1440.

Lorenz, M. O. (1905). Methods of measuring the concentration of wealth. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 9(70), 209-219.

Leimkuhler, F. F. (1967). The bradford distribution. Journal of Documentation, 23(3), 197-207.

Gini C. (1912). Variabilità e mutabilità in: Memori di Metodologia Statistica. Vol. 1, 211–382.

Bookstein, A. (1990). Informetric distributions, part II: Resilience to ambiguity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5), 376-386.

Archive Staff Only: edit this record

|     E-LIS is hosted by AEPIC at CILEA     |     Powered by GNU Eprints software|