Citiranost radova doktora nauka Instituta za nuklearne nauke "Vinča" prema bazi Science Citation Index (SCI). Opšta analiza citiranosti

Avramović, Branislava, Klajn, Ivanka, Đurašević, Branislav and Milonjić, Slobodan Citiranost radova doktora nauka Instituta za nuklearne nauke "Vinča" prema bazi Science Citation Index (SCI). Opšta analiza citiranosti. Infoteka, 2005, vol. 6, n. 3, pp. 163-176. [Journal article (Paginated)]

Preview

PDF 1.pdf Download (471kB) | Preview

English abstract

The article deals with general citation analysis of papers of 148 PhD researchers employed at the Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences (Belgrade) in 2003. The citation research has been done using Science Citation Index (SCI). The total number of citations and self-citations for all these researchers is 13,252, that is 10,097 citations and 3,155 self-citations. As a rule, the larger the number of cited papers, the larger the total number of citations and selfcitation. Citation analysis has been done by scientific fields and subfields, scientific ranking and researcher’s age. It has been found that the total number of citations increases with time for the investigated period (1962-2003). The number of cited papers in technical and technological sciences is considerably smaller than that in natural sciences. The total number of citations per researcher in all scientific fields and subfields increases from lower to higher scientific rank. The average percentage of self-citations in relation to the total number of citations for the given number of researchers and the investigated period, is 23.8%. This percentage is in excellent agreement with the same data in other countries.

Serbian abstract

U radu je data opšta analiza citiranosti radova 148 doktora nauka Instituta za nuklearne nauke "Vinča", Beograd, koji su bili u radnom odnosu u toku 2003.godine. Citiranost je praćena prema Indeksu naučnih citata (Science Citation Index - SCI). Ukupan broj citata i samocitata za 148 doktora nauka iznosi 13.252 od čega je 10.097 citata i 3.155 samocitata. Po pravilu, što je veći broj citiranih radova to je i veći ukupan broj citata i samocitata. Analiza citiranosti je izvršena prema naučnim oblastima i podoblastima naučnim zvanjima i starosnoj dobi doktora nauka. Nađeno je da broj citata raste sa vremenom za ispitani period (1962-2003). Broj citiranih radova u tehničko-tehnološkim naukama je znatno niži od istog broja u prirodnim naukama. Porast citiranosti tj. odnos broja citata/dr nauka u svim naučnim oblastima i podoblastima raste od nižih ka višim naučnim zvanjima. Srednji procenat samocitata u odnosu na ukupan broj citata, za sve ispitivane doktore nauka i izučavani vremenski period, iznosi 23,8%. Ovaj procenat je u odličnoj saglasnosti sa istim podacima u drugim zemljama.

Item type:	Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords:	citiranost, samocitiranost, naukometrija, institut "Vinča", indeks naučnih citata (Sci), citation, self-citation, scientometrics, Vinča institute of nuclear sciences, science citation index (SCI)
Subjects:	B. Information use and sociology of information > BA. Use and impact of information. B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user:	Biljana Kosanovic
Date deposited:	27 Jun 2008
Last modified:	02 Oct 2014 12:11
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/10760/11801

References

Avramović, B., Klajn, I., Indeksi naučnih citata u Biblioteci Matice srpske: od papirne verzije do Interneta.- Godišnjak Biblioteke Matice srpske, 2001, str.134-142.

Đurašević, B., Iz Biblioteke, INN Vesnik, List Instituta za nuklearne nauke «Vinča», Godina VI, 2004, broj 2, str. 4-7.

Braun, T., The reliability of total citation rankings, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., ASAP Article 10.1021/ci0200180, 2002.

Podlubny, I., Comparison of scientific impact expressed by the number of citations in different fields of science, Scientometrics, 64, 2005, str. 95-99.

Hamilton, D. P., Publishing by - and for?- the numbers, Science, 250, 1990, str.1331-1332.

Hamilton, D. P., Research papers: Who’s uncited now?, Science, 251, 1991, str.25.

Gauffrian, M., Larsen, P. O., Counting methods are decisive for rankings based on publication and citation studies, Scientometrics, 64, 2005, str.85-93.

Inönü, E., The influence of cultural factors on scientific production, Scientometrics, 56, 2003, str.137-146.

Garfield, E., Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?, Scientometrics, 1, 1979, str. 359-379.

Aksnes, D. W., A macro study of self-citation, Scientometrics, 56, 2003, str. 235-246.

Van Leeuwen, T. N., Rinia, E. J., Van Raau, A. F. J., Bibliometric profiles of academic physics research in the Netherlands, Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS 96-09, Leiden, 1996.

Moed, H. F., Van der Velde, J. G. M., Bibliometric profiles of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands, Centre for Science and Technology Studies. Report CWTS-93-08, Leiden, 1993.

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item