Open Content Alliance (OCA) vs. Google Books: OCA as superior network and better fit for an emerging global public sphere

Morrison, Heather Open Content Alliance (OCA) vs. Google Books: OCA as superior network and better fit for an emerging global public sphere., 2000 [Preprint]

[thumbnail of OCAdec09.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
OCAdec09.pdf
Download (167kB) | Preview

English abstract

The Open Content Alliance (OCA) is a network of libraries and similar organizations committed to digitizing and providing broadest possible access to books and other materials; over 1.6 million books are already online under OCA principles. OCA is analyzed in contrast with Google Books (as per the preliminary Google Books Settlement, November 2009), using Castell’s network theory and theories of an emerging global public sphere, based on the work of Habermas and Fraser. OCA is seen as a superior network to Google Books, with particular strengths in connectedness, consistency (shared goals), flexibility, scalability, survivability, networking (inclusion / exclusion) power, and network-making power, including the ability to form strategic alliances. The lawsuit against Google Books, and the settlement, illustrate some of the limitations of Google Books as a network, for example the lawsuit per se is a challenge to Google Books’ rights to make decisions on inclusion and exclusion, and illustrates poor connectedness and consistency, two attributes Castells points to as essential to the performance of a network. The respectful, law-abiding approach of OCA is a good fit for a global public sphere, while the Google Books Settlement takes a key issue that has traditionally been decided by governments (orphan books), and brings the decision-making power into private contract negotiations, diminishing democracy. The current Google Books Settlement is fractured on a national (geographic) basis; consequences could include decreased understanding of the rest of the world by a leading nation, the U.S. This works against the development of a global public sphere, and has potential negative economic and security implications for the U.S.. OCA is presented as one node of an emerging library network for the global public sphere, a global public good increasing access to knowledge everywhere, increasing the potential for informed public debate towards global consensus.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: Open Content Alliance, Google Books, network theory, public sphere, library networks
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues.
B. Information use and sociology of information
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AB. Information theory and library theory.
Depositing user: Heather G Morrison
Date deposited: 16 Dec 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:16
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/14048

References

Bailey, C. W. (2009). Google Book Search bibliography. (Version 5: 9/14/2009).

Retrieved October 28, 2009, from http://www.digitalscholarship.org/gbsb/gbsb.htm

BC Electronic Library Network (2009). Retrieved October 28, 2009, from

http://eln.bc.ca

Canadiana.org. Website. Retrieved October 29, 2009, from

http://www.canadiana.org/en/about

Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. vol. I: The information age:

Economy, society, and culture. Malden, Massachussetts: Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DeBruijn, D. (1995). The British Columbia Electronic Library Network - Affordable

innovation. Feliciter Nov./Dec., 32-36. Retrieved October 28, 2009, from http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/10286

Europeana (2009). Website. Retrieved December 12, 2009 from http://www.europeana.eu/

Feenberg, A. (2009). Critical theory of communication technology: Introduction to

the special section. Information Society, 25(2), 77-83.

Fisher, J. (2009). The google book search settlement. Association of Learned &

Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP).

Fraser, N. (2007). Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory Culture &

Society 24(4): 7-30.

Google Books (2009). Google Books settlement agreement. Retrieved December 1,

2009 from http://books.google.com/googlebooks/agreement/

Habermas, J. (1962). The structural transformation of the public sphere, Burger, T. and

Lawrence, F. (transl). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hafner, K. (2009). In challenge to Google, Yahoo will scan books. New York Times

(October 3, 2005). Retrieved December 1, 2009, from

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/03/business/03yahoo.html?_r=1

International Coalition of Library Consortia (ICOLC) (2009). Retrieved October 28,

2009, from http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/

Morrison, H. (2009). Scholarly communication for librarians. Oxford: Chandos.

Nash, K. (2007). Transnationalizing the public sphere: Critique and critical possibilities.

Theory Culture Society, 24 (4), 53-57.

Open Book Alliance (2009). Website. Retrieved December 1, 2009, from

http://www.openbookalliance.org/

Open Content Alliance (2009). Retrieved October 27, 2009, from

http://www.opencontentalliance.org/

Open Content Alliance. About. Retrieved October 28, 2009, from

http://www.opencontentalliance.org/about/

Stuart-Stubbs, B. (1992). Library resource sharing in British Columbia post-secondary

libraries. Burnaby, British Columbia: Open Learning Agency. Retrieved October 28, 2009, from http://ir.lib.sfu.ca/handle/1892/2205

Suber, P. (2009). Open access and the Google Book settlement. SPARC Open Access

Newsletter 140 (Dec. 2, 2009). Retrieved December 3, 2009 from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/12-02-09.htm#gbs

Ugarteche, O. (2007). Transnationalizing the public sphere: A critique of Fraser.

Theory Culture Society, 24(4), 65-69.

Webster, F. (2006). Theories of the information society. Routledge: New York.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS