Modelo genérico de gestão da informação científica para instituições de pesquisa na perspectiva da comunicação científica e do acesso aberto

Leite, Fernando César Lima Modelo genérico de gestão da informação científica para instituições de pesquisa na perspectiva da comunicação científica e do acesso aberto., 2011 PhD thesis, Universidade de Brasília. [Thesis]

[thumbnail of Modelo genérico de gestão da informação científica - Fernando Leite.pdf] PDF
Modelo genérico de gestão da informação científica - Fernando Leite.pdf
Download (8MB)

English abstract

This thesis presents a doctoral research aimed to propose a generic model of scientific information management for research institutes, based on principles of scientific communication and open access. This is a theoretical and exploratory research. From the methodological point of view, it is a mixed methods study which adopted the concurrent triangulation strategy. Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews and checklist, and then submitted to statistical and text analysis. In addition to collecting and analyzing empirical data, it was performed the analysis of scientific communication and information management models identified in the literature. The research sphere was consisted of researchers linked to the research units of the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, and the sample basis, defined from intentional non-probabilistic sampling, were the researchers of the Brazilian Centre for Physics Research and Museum of Astronomy and Related Sciences. The main result of the investigation is the generic model of scientific information management for research institutes, based on scientific communication and open access in its textual and graphical version. In the model, input and output information-flows are systematized by scientific information management processes which are involved from the perspective of scientific communication and open access. Its structure, beyond embedding key concepts, considers the ambient of research institute as an open system where there is the flow of scientific information. The proposed model is also constituted by flexible elements that represent institutional and disciplinary specificities, and vary depending on the research institutes' contexts. Besides, the whole set of elements and relationships among them are under constant influence of forces originating from the scientific community in a broad perspective.

Portuguese abstract

Esta tese apresenta pesquisa de doutorado que teve como objetivo geral propor modelo genérico de gestão da informação científica para instituições de pesquisa, tendo por base os fundamentos da comunicação científica e do acesso aberto. Trata-se de uma pesquisa de natureza teórica e exploratória. Do ponto de vista metodológico, é um estudo de abordagem mista que adotou a estratégia de triangulação concomitante. Os dados foram coletados por meio da aplicação de questionários, realização de entrevistas e lista de verificação e, em seguida, submetidos à análise estatística e de texto. Além da coleta e análise de dados empíricos, realizou-se análise de modelos de comunicação científica e de gestão da informação identificados na literatura. O universo da pesquisa foi constituído dos pesquisadores vinculados às unidades de pesquisa do Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação e a base amostral, definida a partir de amostragem não probalística intencional, foram os pesquisadores do Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas e do Museu de Astronomia e Ciências Afins. Como principal resultado da investigação apresenta-se modelo genérico de gestão da informação científica para institutos de pesquisa, tendo por base a comunicação científica e o acesso aberto, em sua versão gráfica e textual. No modelo, fluxos de entrada e saída de informação são sistematizados por processos de gestão da informação científica que estão envolvidos pela perspectiva da comunicação científica e do acesso aberto. Sua estrutura, além de embutir conceitos essenciais, considera o ambiente do instituto de pesquisa como um sistema aberto onde ocorre o fluxo da informação científica. O modelo proposto é constituído também por elementos flexíveis que representam especificidades institucionais e disciplinares, e que variam em função dos contextos dos institutos de pesquisa. Além disso, todo o conjunto de elementos e relações entre eles estão sob influência constante de forças provenientes da comunidade científica em uma perspectiva ampla.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: scientific communication; open access; information management; scholarly information; scientific information; communication in science; comunicação científica; acesso aberto; gestão da informação; informação científica; comunicação na ciência.
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels.
Depositing user: Fernando César Lima Leite
Date deposited: 16 Dec 2011
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:20
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/16374

References

AGUIAR, A. C. A. Informação e atividades de desenvolvimento científico, tecnológico e industrial: tipologia proposta com base em análise funcional. Ciência da Informação, v. 20, n. 1, 1991. p. 7-17.

ALBERTS, B. Engaging in a worldwide transformation: our responsibility as scientists for the provision of global public goods. In: 139th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C., 2002.

ALLEN, T. J. Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 320p.

ANTELMAN, K. Do open access articles have a greater research impact? College and Research Libraries, v. 65, n. 5, set. 2004.

ANTELMAN, K. Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences. Learned Publishing, v. 19, 2006, p. 85-95.

ARXIV.ORG. arXiv Business Model White Paper. 2010.

ASHBY, W. R. An introduction to cybernetics. Londres: Chapman & Hall, 1956. 295p.

BALTZAN, P.; et al. Business-driven information systems. Whitby, Ontario: McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 2008.

BARREAU, D. The persistence of behavior and form in the organization of personal information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 2, 2008, p. 307–317.

BARUCHSON-ARBIB, S.; BRONSTEIN, J. Humanists as information users in the digital age: the case of jewish studies scholars in Israel. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 58, n. 14, 2007, p. 2269–2279.

BEER, S. Designing freedom. Toronto: CBC Publications, 1974.

BERGSTROM, T. C.; BERGSTROM, C. T. Can 'author pays' journals compete with 'reader pays'? Nature Web Focus: Access to the Literature, 2004.

BIRDSALL, W. F. Towards an integrated knowledge ecosystem: a canadian research strategy. Report submitted to the Canadian Association of Research Libraries / L'Association des bibliothèques de recherche du Canada (CARL/ABRC), 2005.

BJÖRK, B. C. A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. Information Research, v. 12, n. 2.

BORGMAN, C. L. Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the internet. Cambridge, Londres: MIT Press, 2007. 336p.

BORKO, H. Information Science: what is it? American Documentation, v. 19, n.1, p. 3-5, Jan.1968.

BRANIN, J. (Ed.). Collection management in the 1990s. Chicago: American Library Association, 1993.

BRASIL. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. Plano Plurianual 2008-2011: orientações estratégicas do ministério da ciência e tecnologia. Brasília: MCT, 2008.

BROCKMAN, W. S. et al. Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2001. 38p.

BRODY, T.; et al. The effect of open access on citation impact. In: National Policies on Open Access (OA) Provision for University Research Output: an International meeting. Southampton University, Southampton UK, 2004.

BRODY; T.; HARNAD, S. The research impact cycle. 2004.

BROWN, C. M. Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal Of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 50, n. 10, 1999.

BROWN, C. M. The coming of age of e-prints in the literature of physics. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2001.

BUDAPEST OPEN ACCESS INITIATIVE. 2001.

BUDD, J.; CHRISTENSEN, C. Social sciences literature and electronic information. Libraries and the Academy, v. 3, n. 4, 2003, p. 643-651.

CARR, L., et al. Repositories for institutional open access: mandated deposit policies. 2006.

CASE, M. M. Igniting change in scholarly communication: SPARC, present, and future. Advances in Librarianship, v. 26, 2002.

CHERNYI, A. I.; GILYAREVISKYI, R. S.; KOROTKEVICH, L. S. National system of scientific and technical information of the Russian Federation: a draft development program. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, v. 20, n. 2, p. 1–38, 1993.

CHOO, C. W. A organização do conhecimento: como as organizações usam a informação para criar significado, construir conhecimento e tomar decisões. São Paulo: Editora Senac, 2003. 425p.

CHOO, C. W. FAQs on information management. 2010.

CHOO, C. W. Information management for the intelligent organization: the art of scanning the environment. 2ed. Medford: ASIS/Information Today, 1998. 272p.

CHOO, C. W. Towards an informational model of organizations. The Canadian Journal of Information Science, v. 16, n. 3, 1991, p. 32-62.

COCKERILL, M. Business models in open access publishing. In: JACOBS, N. (Ed.). Open access: key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Chandos Publishing: Oxford, 2006.

COOPER, D. R.; SCHINDLER, P. S. Métodos de pesquisa em administração. 7 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2003. 640.

CORREA, C. H. W. Portal de Periódicos da CAPES: um misto de solução financeira e inovação. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 7, n. 1, 2008, p.127-145.

COSTA, S. Filosofia aberta, modelos de negócios e agências de fomento: elementos essenciais a uma discussão sobre o Acesso Livre à informação científica. Ciência da Informação, v. 35, n. 2, p. 39-50, 2006.

CRANE, D. Invisible colleges: diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, 1972. 213p.

CRANE, E. J.; BERNIER, C. L. An Overall concept of scientific documentation systems and their design. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1959. p. 1047-1069.

CRAWFORD, S. Y. Scientific communication and the growth of Big Science. In: CRAWFORD, S. Y.; HURD, H. M.; WELLER, A. C. From print to electronic: the transformation of scientific information. Medford: Asis, 1996. p.1-8.

CRESSWELL, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 3 ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010. 296p.

CROW, R. The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper. ARL Bimonthly Report, n. 223, 2002.

CURTIS, G. Business information systems: analysis, design and practice. Wokigham: Addison-Wesley, 1989. 576p.

DAVENPORT, T. H. Ecologia da informação: por que só a tecnologia não basta para o sucesso na Era da Informação. São Paulo: Futura, 2000.

DAVENPORT, T. H. Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1993. 337p.

DECLARAÇÃO DE BERLIN. Conference on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, Berlin, Outubro, 2003.

DOMINGUEZ, M. B. Economics of open access publishing. Serials, v. 19, n. 1, 2006.

E-RESOURCES FOR RESEARCH IN THE HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2005.

FAIRER-WESSELS, F. A. Information management education: towards a holistic perspective. South African Journal of Library and Information Science, v. 65, n. 2, p. 93-102.

GENTIL-BECCOT, A. et al. Information resources in high-energy physics: surveying the present landscape and charting the future course. 2008.

GOFFMAN, W.; WARREN, K. S. Scientific information systems and the principle of selectivity. New York: Praeger, 1980. 189 p.

GORRAIZ, J. et al. International publication output and research impact in social sciences: comparison of the Universities of Vienna, Zurich and Oslo. Research Evaluation, v. 18, n. 3, 2009, p. 221-232.

GUMIEIRO, K. A. Modelos de negócios para periódicos científicos eletrônicos de acesso aberto. 2009. 157 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência da Informação). Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2009.

HANSON, C. W. Introduction to information science work. London: Aslib, 1973.

HARIDASAN, S.; KHAN, M. Impact and use of e-resources by social scientists in National Social Science Documentation Centre (NASSDOC), India. The Electronic Library, v. 27, n. 1, 2009, p. 117-133.

HARNAD, S. Scholarly skywriting and the prepublication continuum of scientific inquiry. Psychological Science, v. 1, 1990, p. 342-343.

HARNAD, S. Optimizing OA self-archiving mandates: what? where? when? why? how? Technical Report , ECS, University of Southampton, 2006.

HEMMINGER, B. M. et al. Information seeking behavior of academic scientists. Journal Of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 58, n. 14, 2007.

HINE, C. M. (Ed.). New infrastructure for knowledge production: understanding e-science. Hershey: Information Science Publishing, 2006. 286p.

HOUGHTON, H. W. Research practices, evaluation and infrastructure in the digital environment. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, v. 35, n. 3, 2004.

HOUGHTON, H. W.; STEELE, C.; HENTY, M. Changing research practices in the digital information and communication environment. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training, 2003. 186p.

HOUGHTON, J. et al. Economic implications of alternative scholarly publishing models: exploring the costs and benefits. JISC EI-ASPM project. A report to the joint information systems committee (JISC). London: JISC, 2009. 256p.

HOUGHTON, J. W. Costs and benefits of alternative scholarly publishing models: lessons and developments. HEDLUND, T.; TONTA, Y. 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (ELPUB2010), 16-18 June 2010, Helsinki, Finland.

HUANG, M.; CHANG, Y. Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: from a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 59, n. 11, 2008, p. 1819–1828

HURBER, G. P. Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literature. Organization Science, v. 1, n. 2, 1991.

HURD, J. M. Models of scientific communication systems. In: CRAWFORD, S. Y.; HURD, H. M.; WELLER, A. C. From print to electronic: the transformation of scientific information. Medford: Asis, 1996. p.9-33.

HURD, J. M. Scientific communication: new roles and new players. Science & Technology Libraries, v. 25, n. 1, 2004, p. 5-22

HURD, J. M. The transformation of scientific communication: a model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 51, n. 14, 2000, p.1279-1283.

JACOBS, N. (Ed.). Open access: key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Chandos Publishing: Oxford, 2006.

JAEGER, P. T. et al. Information management. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, v.2, 2005.

JAMALI, H. R.; NICHOLAS, D. Information-seeking behavior of physicists and astronomers. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, v. 60, n. 5, 2008, p. 444-462.

JAMALI, H. R.; NICHOLAS, D. Interdisciplinarity and the information-seeking behavior of scientists. Information Processing and Management, v. 46, 2010, p.233-243.

JOHNSON, R. K. Partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, v. 8, n. 11, 2002.

JOINT, N. The 'author pays' model of open access and UK-wide information strategy. Library Review, v. 58, n. 9, 2009, p.630-637.

KAPLAN, N.; STORER, N. W. Scientific communication. In: SILLS, D. L. International encyclopedia of the social sciences. New York: Macmillan, v.14, p.112-117, 1968.

KATZ, J. S.; MARTIN, B. R. What is research collaboration? Research Policy, v. 26, 1997.

KING, T.; TENOPIR, C. An evidence-based assessment of the 'author pays' model. Nature Web Focus: Access to the Literature, 2004.

LAGOZE, C.; VAN DE SOMPEL, H. The open archives initiative: building a low-barrier interoperability framework. In: ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Roanoke, Virginia, 2001, p. 54-62, 2001.

LALLY, E. A researcher's perspective on electronic scholarly communication. Online Information Review, v. 25, n. 2, 2001, p. 80-87.

LANCASTER, F. W.; SMITH, L. C. Science, scholarship and the communication of knowledge. Library Trends, v. 27, n. 3, p. 367-387, 1978.

LAWAL, I. Scholarly communication: the use and non-use of e-print archives for the dissemination of scientific information. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 2002.

LAWRENCE, S. Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact. Nature web debates, 2001.

LEITE, F. C. L. Comunicação científica e gestão do conhecimento: enlaces conceituais para a fundamentação da gestão do conhecimento científico no contexto de universidades. Transinformação, v. 19, n. 2, 2007, p. 139-152.

LINE, M. B. Researchers’ use of libraries and other information sources: current patterns and future trends. Final Report. 2003.

LYNCH, C. A. Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL BimonthlyReport26, 2003.

MacMULLIN, S. E.; TAYLOR, R. S. Problem dimensions and information traits. Information Society, v. 3, n. 1, 1984.

MARON, N. L.; SMITH, K. K. Current models of digital scholarly communication. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 2008. 49 p.

MEADOWS, A. J. A comunicação científica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 1999. 268p.

MENZEL, H. Review of studies in the flow of information among scientists. 2 Vols. In 1. Unpublished Manuscript. Columbia Univ., Bureau of Applied Social Research, 1960.

MENZEL, H. Scientific communication: five themes from social science research. American Psychologist, v.21, n.10, p.999-1004, 1966.

MENZEL, H. The flow of information among scientists: problems, opportunities and research questions - Unpublished Manuscript, Columbia Univ., Bureau Of Applied Social Research. 1958.

MIDDLETON, M. R. Information management: a consolidation of operations analysis and strategy. WaggaWagga: Charles Sturt University, 2002. 526p.

MIKHAILOV, A. I, et al. Scientific communications and informatics. Arlington: Information Resources, 1984. 402 p.

MIKHAILOV, A. I. Finalidades y problemas de la información científica. Boletin de la UNESCO para las Bibliotecas, Havana, v. 13, p. 267-270, 1959.

MIKHAILOV, A. I. Informatics: a scientific discipline. Documentação e Informação Científica, Lisboa, v. 10, n. 53, p. 239-242,1967.

MIKHAILOV, A. I. Information in a Developing World. In: International Forum on Information and Documentation, v.9, n. 3, p. 1-2, 1984.

MIKHAILOV, A. I. Information science and an informed society. ASIS Bulletin, v. 10, n. 1, p. 14-17, 1983.

MIKHAILOV, A. I. On the Functioning of the All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information of the USSR Academy of Sciences. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 1959. p. 511-522.

MIKHAILOV, A. I. The future of scientific information. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, New York, v. 12, n.1, p.1-5, 1985.

MIKHAILOV, A. I.; CHERNYI, A. I.; GILYAREVSKY, R.S. Estrutura e principais propriedades da informação científica. In: GOMES, Hagar. Espanha. (Org.). Ciência da informação ou informática? Rio de Janeiro: Calunga, 1980.

MIKHAILOV, A. I.; CHERNYI, A. I.; GILYAREVSKY, R.S. Fundamentos de la informatica. Habana: IDICT/Academia de Ciências de Cuba. Havana IDICT, 1973. 2 v.

MIKHAILOV, A. I.; CHERNYI, A. I.; GILYAREVSKY, R.S. Informatics: its scope and methods. In: MILHAILOV, A. I. On theoretical problems of informatics. FID/RI – International Federation for Documentation. Study Committee Research on Theoretical Basis of Information. Moscou: Viniti, 1969.

MOORE, G. Survey of University of Toronto faculty awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding scholarly communication: a preliminary report. Toronto: University of Toronto. 185p.

MORRISON, H. Scholarly communication for librarians. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2009. 264 p.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2004. 406p.

OCHOLLA, D. N. Developing an infrastructure for scientific information in Kenya. Library Review, v. 41, n. 5, 1992. p. 48-59.

ODLYZKO, A. Economic costs of toll access. In: JACOBS, N. (Ed.). Open access: key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Chandos Publishing: Oxford, 2006.

OLSON, G. M., et al. (Ed.). Scientific colaboration on the internet. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008. 406p.

OVER, A. et al. Publishing strategies in transformation? Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verla, 2005. 65p.

PINFIELD, S. A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories. Serials, v. 18, n. 1, 2005, p. 30-34.

PINFIELD, S. How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine, v. 7, n. 12, 2001.

ROMARY, L. Scholarly communication. 2011.

ROOSENDAAL, H.E.; GEURTS, P.A.T.M. Forces and functions in scientific communication: An analysis of their interplay. 1998.

ROWLANDS, G. Management implications of the new information technologies in an R&D environment. In: CRONIN, B. (Ed.). Information management: from strategies to action. Londres: Aslib, 1985. 118-124p.

ROWLANDS, I.; NICHOLAS, D. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: the 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings: New Information Perspectives, v. 57, n. 6, 2005, p. 481-497.

ROWLEY, J. The basics of information technology. Londres: Bingley, 1988. 146 p.

ROWLEY, J. Towards a framework for information management. International Journal of Information Management, v. 8, n. 5, p. 359-369, 1998.

SCHROTER, S.; TITE, L. Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, v. 99, 2006.

SHEARER, K.; BIRDSALL, B. The transition of scholarly communication in Canada. 2002.

SØNDERGAARD, T. F. et al. Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information: revising and updating the UNISIST model. Journal of Documentation, v. 59, n. 3, p. 278-320, 2003.

SPARKS, S. JISC disciplinary differences report. London: Lincoln House, 2005. 92p.

SUBER, P. Open access overview: focusing on open access to peer-reviewed research articles and their preprints. 2010.

SUBER, P. Timeline of the Open Access Movement. 2007.

SWAN, A. Journal authors survey: report. Cornwall: Key Perspectives, 2004. 77p.

SWAN, A. Key concerns within the scholarly communication process: report to the JISC Scholarly Communications Group. Truro: Key Perspectives Ltd, 2008. 65p.

SWAN, A. The culture of open access: researchers’ views and responses. In: JACOBS, N. (Ed.) Open access: Key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Oxford: Chandos, 2006.

SWAN, A. The open access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Technical Report. Southampton: University of Southampton, 2010. 17p.

SWAN, A.; BROWN, S. Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, v. 17, 2004, p. 219-224.

SWAN, A.; BROWN, S. Open access self-archiving: an author study. Cornwall: Key Perspectives, 2005. 97p.

TAYLOR, A.; FARREL, S. Information Management for business. Aslib Proceedings, v. 44, n. 9, 1992. p. 319-322.

TAYLOR, A.; FARREL, S. Information Management for business. Metuchen, London: Aslib, 1995. 169p.

TAYLOR, R. S. Value-added process in information systems. Norwood: Ablex Publishing, 1986.

TUSHMAN, M. L.; SCALAN, T. J. Boundary spanning individuals: their role in information transfer and their antecedents. Academy of Management Journal, v. 28, n. 2, p. 289-305, 1981.

UNISIST II. Intergovernmental Conference on Scientific and Technological Information for Development. Main Working Document. Paris : United Nations, Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), 1979.

UNISIST. Study report on the feasibility of a world science information system. Paris: UNESCO, 1971. 161p.

VASKA, M. Introducing grey literature. In: PEJŠOVÁ, P. Grey literature repositories. Slim : Verbal, 2010. p. 11-19.

VICKERS, P. Information management: selling a concept. In: CRONIN, B. Information management: from strategies to action. P. 151.160.

WEITZEL, S. R. O papel dos repositórios institucionais e temáticos na estrutura da produção científica. Me Questa, v. 12, n. 1, p. 51-71, 2006.

WHITE, M. Intelligence management. In: CRONIN, B. (Ed.). Information management: from strategies to action. Londres: Aslib, 1985. p. 21-35.

WILLINSKY, J. The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2006. 287p.

WILSON, T. D. Information management. In: FEATHER, J.; STURGES, P. (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. Londres: Rout leg, 2002.

YANG, S. et al. An empirical study on the utilization of web academic resources in humanities and social sciences based on web citations. Scientometrics, v. 84, 2010, p. 1-19.

ZIMAN, J. M. The paradoxical conventionality of the traditional scientific paper. In: Conference on quality-based information systems. New York: Pocantico Hills, 1978.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS