Rejected papers: fracaso y oportunidad

Marcos, Mari-Carmen Rejected papers: fracaso y oportunidad. Anuario ThinkEPI, 2014, vol. 8, pp. 220-221. [Journal article (Paginated)]

Preview

Text (Journal article) 220-221_Marcos.pdf - Published version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. Download (634kB) | Preview

English abstract

The system of scientific publication subjects the submitted manuscript to review, and it is common that many studies are rejected, for various reasons. Some researchers improve the study and achieve publication in another journal, while others abandon the effort and the work remains unpublished. The rejected papers that eventually achieve publication are cited more often than those accepted without changes, because the peer review process improves the quality.

Spanish abstract

El sistema de publicación científica somete los manuscritos que recibe a revisión, y es habitual que muchos trabajos sean rechazados por diversos motivos. Algunos investigadores mejoran el estudio y logran que otra revista lo publique, otros abandonan y el trabajo queda inédito. Los trabajos rechazados que posteriormente se publican suelen recibir más citas que aquellos aceptados sin cambios, pues la revisión hace que sean de mayor calidad.

Item type:	Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords:	Publicación científica, Revistas científicas, Revisión por pares, Artículos rechazados, Scientific publication, Scientific journals, Peer review, Rejected papers.
Subjects:	B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion. E. Publishing and legal issues. E. Publishing and legal issues. > EZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user:	Mari-Carmen Marcos
Date deposited:	29 Jun 2014 08:03
Last modified:	31 Jul 2016 22:02
URI:	http://hdl.handle.net/10760/23321

References

Calcagno, Vincent; Demoinet, Emilie; Gollner, K.; Guidi, Lionel; Ruths, Derek; De-Mazancourt, Claire (2012). “Flows of research manuscripts among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns”. Science, n. 338, pp. 1065-1069.

http://vcalcagnoresearch.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/upcoming-article-in-science-publication-web-project

http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1227833

Diana, Alessandro (2012). “How far are scientists willing to publish their research articles or scientific reviews”. Researchgate.net, 17 mayo.

http://www.researchgate.net/post/How_far_are_scientists_willing_to_go_to_publish_their_rejected_articles_or_scientific_reviews

Pimm, Jonathan (2013). “Dear Editor, why have you rejected my article?”. The psychiatrist, v. 37, pp. 313-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.044784

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item