Webometric Analysis of Top Ten Asian and Indian Universities

Jalal, Samir Kumar, Sutradhar, B and Mukhopadhyay, Parthasarathi Webometric Analysis of Top Ten Asian and Indian Universities. Webometric Analysis of Top Ten Asian and Indian Universities, 2016, vol. 53, n. 2, pp. 119-127. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of SRELS-Journal.pdf]
Preview
Text
SRELS-Journal.pdf

Download (409kB) | Preview

English abstract

The paper tries to assess all the existing ranking systems which are used to rank higher educational institutions. The aim of the paper is to provide sufficient background to design and develop a new ranking system for a country. An attempt has been taken to find out the reasons of low ranking of Indian universities with respect to the world university ranking through webometric analysis of top ten Indian and Asian universities. A comparative study of top Ten Indian Universities and Asian universities is made with respect to significant web indicators, which are frequently used in ranking purpose. The results found that there is a significant difference of values of webpages, backlinks, rich files, Google Scholar and research publications between these top Ten Asian Universities and Indian universities.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Webometric Analysis, University Ranking, Indian Universities, Asian Universities
Subjects: L. Information technology and library technology > LC. Internet, including WWW.
Depositing user: Dr. Samir Kumar Jalal
Date deposited: 10 Mar 2017 06:51
Last modified: 10 Mar 2017 06:51
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/30947

References

1. Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) Retrieved

dated August 27, 2015 from http://www.shanghairanking.

com/

2. Jalal, S.K (2012). Indian Universities on the Web: Analysis of

hyperlinks through the applications of webometric tools and

techniques (PhD Thesis), University of Burdwan.

3. Almind, T.C., &Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric Analysis

on the World Wide Web: MethodologicalApproaches to

Webometrics.Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404-426;

4. CheckPageRank (n.d). Retrieved dated 30 August 2015

fromhttp://checkpagerank.net/index.php

5. Jacsó, P(2005). Google Scholar: the pros and the cons.

Online Information Review, 29(2); 208 – 214

6. Price, G. (2004). Google Scholar documentation and large

PDF files. Retrieved dated August 30, 2015 fromhttp://blog.

searchenginewatch.com/blog/041201-105511

7. Use Ahrefs Ranking Instead Of Dead Page Rank (n.d).

https://blog.ahrefs.com/use-ahrefs-ranking-instead-ofdead-

page-rank/

8. Understand DoFollow&Nofollow Link: SEO Basics.

Retrieved dated 30 August 2015 from http://www.shoutmeloud.

com/understand-dofollow-nofollow-link-seo-basics.

html


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item