SKOS Concepts and Natural Language Concepts: an Analysis of Latent Relationships in KOSs

[1] Antoniou G, Van Harmelen F. A Semantic Web Primer. 2ed ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008.

[2] W3C. SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference, http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/ (2009, accessed 1 March 2014).

[3] Baker T, Bechhofer S, Isaac A, et al. Key choices in the design of Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 2013; 20: 35–49.

[4] Giunchiglia F, Maltese V, Dutta B. Domains and Context: First Steps towards Managing Diversity in Knowledge. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 2012; 12–13: 53–63.

[5] Giunchiglia F, Dutta B, Maltese V. From Knowledge Organization to Knowledge Representation. Departmental Technical Report DISI-13-027, Trento: Università di Trento, http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/4186/ (2013, accessed 7 February 2015).

[6] Guns R. Tracing the origins of the semantic web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2013; 64: 2173–2181.

[7] W3C. SKOS eXtension for Labels (SKOS-XL) Namespace Document - HTML Variant, http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-skos-reference-20090818/skos-xl.html (2009, accessed 16 October 2014).

[8] W3C. SKOS Implementation Report, http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20090315/implementation.html (19 May 2009, accessed 29 September 2015).

[9] Hodge G. Systems of Knowledge Organization for Digital Libraries: Beyond Traditional Authority Files. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED440657.pdf (2000, accessed 2 August 2015).

[10] Hjørland B. Concept Theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2009; 60: 1519–1536.

[11] Egozi O, Markovitch S, Gabrilovich E. Concept-Based Information Retrieval Using Explicit Semantic Analysis. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 2011; 29: 8:1–8:34.

[12] Hjørland B. Concepts, Paradigms and Knowledge Organization. In: Gnoli C, Mazzocchi F (eds) Paradigms and Conceptual Systems in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO Conference, 23-26 February 2010, Rome, Italy. Würzburg: Ergon, 2010, pp. 38–42.

[13] Martínez-González MM, Alvite-Díez M-L. On the evaluation of thesaurus tools compatible with the Semantic Web. Journal of Information Science 2014; 40: 711–722.

[14] European Union, Publications Office. Eurovoc: the EU’s multilingual thesaurus, http://eurovoc.europa.eu/ (accessed 13 July 2015).

[15] Library of Congress. Library of Congress Subject Headings: LC Linked Data Service, http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects.html (accessed 13 July 2015).

[16] OCLC. Dewey Decimal Classification, https://www.oclc.org/dewey/webservices.en.html (accessed 13 July 2015).

[17] ISO. ISO 25964-1: Information and documentation Thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies Part 1: Thesauri for information retrieval. ISO 25964-1:2011(E), International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2011.

[18] Harper CA. Encoding Library of Congress Subject Headings in SKOS: Authority control for the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Manzanillo, Mexico: Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/842 (2006, accessed 1 March 2014).

[19] Mitchell JS, Zeng ML, Žumer M. Modeling Classification Systems in Multicultural and Multilingual Contexts. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 2014; 52: 90–101.

[20] Pinker S. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. third edition. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2007.

[21] Ganbold A, Farazi F, Giunchiglia F. An experiment in managing language diversity across cultures. Departmental Technical Report DISI - 13 - 032, Trento: Università di Trento, http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/4221/ (4 October 2013, accessed 23 April 2014).

[22] Kless D, Lindenthal J, Milton S, et al. Interoperability of knowledge organization systems with and through ontologies. In: Slavic A, Civallero E (eds) Classification & ontology: formal approaches and access to knowledge: proceedings of the international UDC seminar 19-20 September 2011, The Hague, the Netherlands, organized by UDC Consortium, The Hague. Würzburg: Ergon, 2011, pp. 55–74.

[23] Portner PH. What is Meaning?: Fundamentals of Formal Semantics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2005.

[24] Manning CD, Schütze H. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005.

[25] Murphy GL. The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002.

[26] Wilks Y. Good and Bad Arguments About Semantic Primitives. In: Ahmad K, Brewster C, Stevenson M (eds) Words and Intelligence I. Springer Netherlands, pp. 103–139, http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1-4020-5285-5_6 (2007, accessed 29 March 2015).

[27] Haspelmath M. Word Classes and Parts of Speech. In: Baltes NJSB (ed) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Pergamon, pp. 16538–16545, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B0080430767029594 (2001, accessed 29 March 2015).

[28] Helbig H. Knowledge Representation and the Semantics of Natural Language. Berlin: Springer, http://link.springer.com/10.1007/3-540-29966-1 (2006, accessed 28 April 2015).

[29] Booij G. The Grammar of Words: An Introduction to Linguistic Morphology. 3rd edition. Oxford University Press, 2012.

[30] Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, et al. (eds). The world atlas of language structures. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

[31] Clark A, Fox C, Lappin S (eds). The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing. Wiley-Blackwell, http://eu.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1405155817.html (2010, accessed 3 May 2015).

[32] Prokopidis P, Georgantopoulos B, Papageorgiou H. A suite of NLP tools for Greek. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of Greek Linguistics. Komotini, Greece, http://nlp.ilsp.gr/nlp/ICGL2011_Prokopidis_etal.pdf (2011).

[33] Katsogiannu M, Efthimiou E (eds). Ellēnikē orologia: ereuna kai epharmoges = Hellenic terminology: research and applications [written in Greek]. Athēna: Kastaniōtēs, 2004.

[34] Jain P, Hitzler P, Yeh PZ, et al. Linked Data is merely more data. In: Brickley D, Chaudhri VK, Halpin H, et al. (eds) Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence. California: AAAI Press, pp. 82–86, http://knoesis.wright.edu/library/publications/linkedai2010_submission_13.pdf (2010).

[35] Soergel D, Lauser B, Liang A, et al. Reengineering Thesauri for New Applications: the AGROVOC Example. Journal of Digital Information; 4, https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/112 (2006, accessed 17 November 2014).

[36] L’Homme M-C, Bernier-Colborne G. Terms as labels for concepts, terms as lexical units: A comparative analysis in ontologies and specialized dictionaries. Applied Ontology 2012; 7: 387–400.

[37] Binding C, Tudhope D. KOS at your Service: Programmatic Access to Knowledge Organisation Systems. Journal of Digital Information; 4, https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/110 (2004, accessed 30 September 2015).

[38] Andersen H, Barker P, Chen X. The cognitive structure of scientific revolutions. 1. paperback ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013.

[39] Zong N, Lee S, Kim H-G. Discovering expansion entities for keyword-based entity search in linked data. Journal of Information Science 2015; 41: 209–227.

[40] Panzer M, Zeng ML. Modeling classification systems in SKOS: Some challenges and best-practice recommendations. Seoul, Korea: DCMI, pp. 3–14, http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/974 (2009, accessed 1 October 2015).