Report on offset agreements: evaluating current Jisc Collections deals. Year 3 – evaluating 2017 deals

Lawson, Stuart Report on offset agreements: evaluating current Jisc Collections deals. Year 3 – evaluating 2017 deals., 2018 [Report]

[thumbnail of offsetting-report-3.pdf]
Preview
Text
offsetting-report-3.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication.

Download (239kB) | Preview

English abstract

This report is the final of three annual evaluations of Jisc Collections offset agreements. The work has been sponsored by Jisc as part of the Jisc Collections Studentship Award at Birkbeck, University of London.

Item type: Report
Keywords: open access, articles processing charges, Jisc Collections, offsetting
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues. > EB. Printing, electronic publishing, broadcasting.
Depositing user: Stuart Lawson
Date deposited: 02 Feb 2019 19:37
Last modified: 02 Feb 2019 19:37
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/33909

References

Andrew, Theo (2016) Improving estimates of the total cost of publication by recognising ‘APCs paid in the wild’. The Winnower. <https://thewinnower.com/papers/4241-improving-estimates-of-the-total-cost-of-publication-by-recognising-apcs-paid-in-the-wild>

Bauer et al. (2015) Recommendations for the transition to open access in Austria. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.34079>

Björk, B.‐C., and D.J. Solomon (2014) Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges. London: Wellcome Trust. <https://www.fwf.ac.at/fileadmin/files/Dokumente/Downloads/Dev_Effective_Market_OA_Article_Processing_Charges.pdf>

Burgess, R. (2015) Review of the implementation of the RCUK open access policy. Swindon: Research Councils UK. <http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/documents/openaccessreport-pdf/>

CRIStin (2016) National guidelines for open access to research results. <http://www.cristin.no/english/open-access-eng/national-guidelines-for-open-access-to-research-re/national-guidelines-for-open-access-to-research-results.pdf>

De Castro, Pablo (2015) The OpenAIRE2020 FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot: Implementing a European-wide funding initiative for open access publishing costs. Information Services & Use, 35: 235–241. <http://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-150786>

Earney, Liam (2017) Offsetting and its discontents: Challenges and opportunities of open access offsetting agreements. Insights, 30(1): 11–24. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.345

Earney, Liam (2018) National licence negotiations advancing the open access transition – a view from the UK. Insights, 31(11). DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.412

ESAC (2016) Joint understanding of offsetting. <http://esac-initiative.org/joint-understanding-of-offsetting/>

EU2016 (2016) All European scientific articles to be freely accessible by 2020. <http://english.eu2016.nl/binaries/eu2016-en/documents/press-releases/2016/05/27/all-european-scientific-articles-to-be-freely-accessible-by-2020/press-release-all-european-scientific-articles-to-be-freely.pdf>

European Commission (2018) ‘Plan S’ and ‘cOAlition S’ – Accelerating the transition to full and immediate open access to scientific publications. <https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/moedas/announcements/plan-s-and-coalition-s-accelerating-transition-full-and-immediate-open-access-scientific_en>

Eve, Martin (2014) Open access and the humanities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)

Fraser, Claire, Geoff Hill, Helen Snaith, and Jade Taffs (2018) Monitoring sector progress towards compliance with funder open access policies (Bristol: Research England) <https://re.ukri.org/documents/2018/research-england-open-access-report-pdf/>

Gray, Andrew (2015) Considering non-open access publication charges in the “Total Cost of Publication”. Publications, 3(4): 248–262. <http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/publications3040248>

Holliday, L., and K. Jones (2015) Using functional cost analysis to evaluate the APC payments process. [original report no longer available. Early draft available at <https://gw4openaccess.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/gw4-oa-pathfinderwp-1-report-march2015.docx>]

Holliday, L., and K. Jones (2015a) Pre-payments and the development of the APC market. <https://gw4openaccess.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/a-review-of-the-literature-on-the-potential-wider-market-effects-of-pre-payments-on-the-apc-payments-market-v2-11.pdf>

Jacobs, Neil (2018) The changing role of research funders in open science? <https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2018/04/03/the-changing-role-of-research-funders-in-open-science/>

Jisc (2015) Principles for offset agreements. <https://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Global/News%20files%20and%20docs/Principles-for-offset-agreements.pdf>

Jisc (2017) Open access update, December 2017. <https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6732/1/Jisc_OA_Digest_-_December_2017.pdf>

Jisc (2018a) Open access update, March 2018. <https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6818/1/Jisc_OA_Digest_-_March_2018.pdf>

Jisc (2018b) Open access update, June 2018. <https://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6868/1/JiscOADigestJune2018.pdf>

Jisc OA Good Practice Pathfinder project (2016) Vouchers and discount codes recommendations for publishers and institutions. <https://gw4openaccess.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/vouchers-and-discount-codes-recommendations-for-publishers-and-institutions.docx>

Johnson, R., S. Pinfield, and M. Fosci (2015) Business process costs of implementing “gold” and “green” open access in institutional and national contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, early view. <https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23545>

Jones, Finlay (2015) Open Access Good Practice project: GW4 offset implementation review. <https://gw4openaccess.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/open-access-good-practice-project-gw4-offset-implementation-review-v3.docx>

Jubb, M., Goldstein, S., Amin, M., Plume, A., Aisati, M., Oeben, S., ... Fosci, M. (2015) Monitoring the transition to open access: A report for Universities UK. London: Research Information Network on behalf of Universities UK. <http://www.researchinfonet.org/oamonitoring/>

Jubb, Michael, Andrew Plume, Stephanie Oeben, Lydia Brammer, Rob Johnson, Cihan Bütün, and Stephen Pinfield (2017) Monitoring the transition to open access: December 2017. Universities UK. <http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2017/monitoring-transition-open-access-2017.pdf>

Lawson, Stuart (2016) Open financial data on article processing charges. figshare. <https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.2860717>

Lawson, Stuart (2016a) Report on offset agreements: evaluating current Jisc Collections deals. Year 1 – evaluating 2015 deals. figshare. <https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4047777.v1>

Lawson, Stuart (2017) Journal subscription expenditure in the UK 2015–16. figshare. <https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4542433.v3>

Lawson, Stuart (2017a) Report on offset agreements: evaluating current Jisc Collections deals. Year 2 – evaluating 2016 deals. figshare. <https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5383861.v1>

Lawson, Stuart (2018) RCUK open access block grant allocation 2013–18. figshare. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4047315

Lawson, S., J. Gray, and M. Mauri (2016) Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding: A public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing. Open Library of Humanities, 2(1). <http://doi.org/10.16995/olh.72>

Lawson, S., and B. Meghreblian (2014) Journal subscription expenditure of UK higher education institutions. F1000Research. <http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.5706.3>

Lundén, A.,C. Smith, and B.-M. Wideberg (2018) National licence negotiations advancing the open access transition – a view from Sweden. Insights, 31(12). <https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.413>

Manista, Frank (2016) Report for Jisc Collections on administrative burden of offset agreements. Unpublished.

Marques, Mafalda (2017) Springer Compact agreement: first year evaluation. <https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2017/03/06/compact-agreement-first-year-evaluation/>

Morrison, H., W. Brutus, M. Dumais-Desrosiers, T.L. Kakou, K. Laprade, S. Merhi, A. Ouerghi, J. Salhab, V. Volkanova, and S. Wheatley (2017) Open access article processing charges (OA APC) longitudinal study 2016 dataset. Data, 2(2). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/data2020013

Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research (2017) National goals and guidelines for open access to research articles. <https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/ae7f1c4b97d34806b37dc767be1fce76/national-goals-and-guidelines-for-open-access-to-research-articles.pdf>

NWO (2016) Q&A open access at NWO. <http://www.nwo.nl/en/policies/open+science/open+access+publishing>

OpenAPC (2018) Offsetting: Springer Nature <https://treemaps.intact-project.org/apcdata/offsetting/#publisher/Springer%20Nature/period=2017&country=GBR>

Pinfield, S., and C. Middleton (2016) Researchers’ adoption of an institutional central fund for open-access article-processing charges: A case study using innovation diffusion theory. SAGE Open. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244015625447>

Pinfield, S., J. Salter, and P.A. Bath (2015) The ‘total cost of publication’ in a hybrid open-access environment: Institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, early view. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23446>

Pinfield, S., J. Salter, and P.A. Bath (2016) A ‘gold-centric’ implementation of open access: Hybrid journals, the ‘total cost of publication’ and policy development in the UK and beyond. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, in press. <http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/96336/>

RCUK (2017) Research Councils UK confirm RCUK Open Access block grant funding levels until 2020. <http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/media/news/180717/>

RCUK (n.d.) Open access block grants post March 2018 <http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/openaccess/open-access-block-grants-post-march-2018/>

Research Consulting (2018) The role of hybrid open access in extending author choice. <https://www.publishers.org.uk/EasySiteWeb/GatewayLink.aspx?alId=25423>

Ross-Hellauer, Tony, Birgit Schmidt, and Bianca Kramer (2018) Are funder Open Access platforms a good idea? PeerJ Preprints. <https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26954v1>

Royal Society of Chemistry (2016) Gold for Gold scheme to end 2017. <http://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/librarians-information/librarians-notes/all-articles/2016/jun/g4g-scheme-ends-2017/>

Science Europe (2018a) Workshop report – Challenging the current business models in academic publishing: Accelerators and obstacles to the open access transition. <http://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/SE_WS_Report_OA_Big_Deals.pdf>

Science Europe (2018b) Science without publication paywalls, a preamble to: cOAlition S for the realisation of full and immediate open access <https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/cOAlitionS.pdf>

Shamash, Katie (2016) Article processing charges (APCs) and subscriptions. Jisc. <https://www.jisc.ac.uk/reports/apcs-and-subscriptions>

Shamash, Katie (2017) Article processing charges in 2016. Jisc. <https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2017/08/23/article-processing-charges-in-2016/>

Shamash, Katie (2018) APC data collected by Jisc 2013-2017. figshare. <https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7264823.v1>

Sharp, Catherine (2015) Institutional policies on the use of open access funds: A report from the Jisc Pathways to Open Access project. <http://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/open-access/files/2015/12/Pathways-to-OA-APC-funds-survey-report-Dec-15.pdf>

Siler, K., S. Haustein, E. Smith, V. Larivière, and J.P. Alperin (2018) Authorial and institutional stratification in open access publishing: the case of global health research. PeerJ, 6:e4269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4269

Springer (2018) Institutional Agreements. <https://www.springer.com/gb/open-access/springer-open-choice/springer-compact>

UK Government (2018) HMRC foreign exchange rates: yearly averages and spot rates. <https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/exchange-rates-for-customs-and-vat-yearly>

Wellcome Trust (2016) Wellcome Trust and COAF open access spend, 2014–15. <https://blog.wellcome.ac.uk/2016/03/23/wellcome-trust-and-coaf-open-access-spend-2014-15/>

Wiley (2017) Form 10-K: Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the Fiscal Year Ended: April 30, 2017. <https://s3.amazonaws.com/wiley-ecomm-prod-content/April+30%2C+2017.pdf>


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item