|   homepage   |   about E-LIS   |   browse   |   search   |   help   |   classification schema   |   submission guidelines   ||
| Login/Your pages | Create Account|

Zero Censorship! Who Are We Kidding?An exploratory analysis of the opinions and experiences of Queensland-based public librarians with regard to the censorship of materials in public library collections

Moody, Kim (2004) Zero Censorship! Who Are We Kidding?An exploratory analysis of the opinions and experiences of Queensland-based public librarians with regard to the censorship of materials in public library collections. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
180Kb Language: English

Abstract(s)

Public librarians have long upheld the social justice philosophy of free access to information for all people. The issue of censorship is related to both the professional principles of the Australian Library and Information Association and to the role public librarians have to play in nurturing social capital in our communities. Until now there has been little Australian data on this topic. This paper considers the philosophy of free access to information in the context of contemporary item selection and classification processes within public libraries. The findings of a survey of Queensland public librarians are used to identify current industry attitudes towards the public right to information, and to determine the degree to which censorship mechanisms are currently practiced or prevented in public libraries. The findings support those of overseas researchers that stated anti-censorship attitudes are not always indicative of censorship behaviours, and that some librarians employ self-censorship with regard to controversial materials in order to avoid censorship challenges.


Item Type:Journal Article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords:Censorship, Intellectual Freedom, Information Suppression, Freedom to Read, Library Acquisitions, Public Libraries, Alternative Literature
Subjects:E. Publishing and legal issues. > EE. Intellectual freedom.
E. Publishing and legal issues. > EF. Censorship.
Full Metadata:Show all fields
ID Code:3611
Deposited By:Moody, Kim E
Deposited On:12 Apr 2005
Last Modified:19 Nov 2008 09:45
Statistics:View statistics for this eprint

ALIA (2001a) ‘Policy statements’, Incite [Online], September 2001. Available http://www.alia.org.au/publishing/incite/2001/09/policies.html. [Accessed 12 Jan. 2004].

ALIA (2001b). Statement on Free Access to Information [Online]. Available: http://www.alia.org.au/policies/free.access.html. [Accessed 16th Jul. 2003].

Asheim L E (1954) ‘Not censorship, but selection’, in Mosher F J (ed.) Freedom of Book Selection, American Library Association, Chicago, pp.90-99.

Atton C (1996) Alternative Literature: A Practical Guide for Librarians, Gower, Hampshire, U.K.

Berry J N (2003) ‘The stuff of patriotism’, Library Journal, vol.128, no.17, p.17. Available: EbscoHost database. [Accessed 26th Mar. 2004].

Bundy M L & Stakem T (1982) ‘Librarians and intellectual freedom: are opinions changing?’, Wilson Library Bulletin, vol 56, no 8 (April), pp.584-589.

Busha C H (1972) Freedom Versus Suppression And Censorship: With a Survey of the Attitudes of Midwestern Public Librarians and a Bibliography of Censorship, Libraries Unlimited, Colorado.

Cambridge University Press (2003) Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary [Online]. Available: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/. [Accessed 6th November 2003].

Christian Democratic Party (2003). Policy Summary, 2003 [NSW] State Election [Online]. Available http://www.cdp.org.au/fed/2001fedpolicy.asp. [Accessed 5th Aug. 2003].

Commonwealth of Australia. (2004). Anti-terrorism Bill 2004. Retrieved May 7, 2004 from http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/legcon_ctte/anti_terrorism04/info/bill.pdf.

Curry A (1997) The limits of Tolerance: Censorship and Intellectual Freedom in Public Libraries, Scarecrow Press, Lanham, Maryland.

Dawson E (2003) ‘Library ethics and the problem with patriotism’, in Roberto K & West J, Revolting Librarians Redux, McFarland & Co, Jefferson, North Carolina, pp.95-100.

Doyle T (2002) ‘Selection versus censorship in libraries’, Collection Management, vol.27, no.1, pp.15-25.

Evans G E (2000) Developing Library and Information Centre Collections, 4th ed, Libraries Unlimited, Englewood.

Fiske M (1959) Book Selection and Censorship: a Study of School and Public Libraries in California, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

Giese D (1994) ‘Censorship’, Link-up, September, pp.3-6.

Hadley J (2003) ‘There and back again’, in Roberto K & West J, Revolting Librarians Redux, McFarland & Co, Jefferson, North Carolina, pp.26-29.

Howard J (2004) Interview with Prime Minister John Howard by Laurie Oakes. Sunday, Channel Nine, Television Broadcast, 28th Mar. 2004. Transcript available: http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/political_transcripts/article_1512.asp [Accessed: 29th Mar. 2004]

Kaser D (2003) ‘Sound off for the freedom to read’, Information Today, vol 20, no 8, p.16. Available: Retrieved EbscoHost database. [Accessed 26 Feb. 2004].

Lee E (1998) Libraries in the Age of Mediocrity, McFarland & Co, North Carolina.

Leys, N (2004, 5th April). Hicks’s father hits book ban. The Australian, p.6.

Litwin (2003) ‘Radicals defending tradition: an appeal to the baby boom generation’, in Roberto K & West J, Revolting Librarians Redux, McFarland & Co, Jefferson, North Carolina, pp.88-91.

Malley I (1990) Censorship and Libraries, Library Association, London.

Mediavilla C (1997) ‘The war on books and ideas: the California Library Association and anti-communist censorship in the 1940s and 1950s’, Library Trends, vol.46, no.2 (Fall), pp.331-357.

Parkinson P (1987) ‘Greater expectations: services to lesbians and gay men’, New Zealand Libraries, vol.45, no.5 (March), pp.92-97.

Pike G H (2002) ‘History repeated with the USA PATRIOT Act’, Information Today, vol.19, no.11, pp.19-21. Available: EbscoHost database. [Accessed 26th Mar. 2004].

Robotham J & Shields G (1982) Freedom of Access to Library Materials, Neal-Schuman, New York.

Schrader A M (1986) ‘Censorship iceberg: results of an Alberta public library survey’, Canadian Library Journal, vol.43 (April), pp.91-95.

Schrader A M (1992) ‘A study of community censorship pressures on Canadian public libraries’, Canadian Library Journal, vol.49 (Feb), pp.29-38.

Schweinsburg J D (1995) ‘Professional awareness of the ethics of selection’, Journal of Information Ethics, Fall, p.33-42.

Selth J P (1993). Ambition, Discrimination and Censorship in Libraries, McFarland & Co, North Carolina.

Wallace P D (1997) ‘Outsourcing book selection in public and school libraries’, Collection Building, vol.16, no.4, pp.160-166. Available: Emerald Fulltext database. [Accessed 3rd Feb. 2004].

West C (1983) ‘The secret garden of censorship: ourselves’, Library Journal, vol.108, no.15, pp.1651-1653.

Whyte J P (1970) ‘Trends abroad: Australia’, Library Trends, vol.19, no.1, pp.122-130.

Wiegand W A (1998) ‘Main Street Public Library: the availability of controversial materials in the rural heartland, 1890-1956’, Libraries & Culture, vol.33, no.1 (Winter), pp.127-133.

Willett C (1998) ‘Consider the source: a case against outsourcing materials selection in academic libraries’, Collection Building, Vol.17, No.2, pp.91-95. Available: Emerald Fulltext database. [Accessed 3rd Feb. 2004].

Williamson K (2002) Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals: Information Management and Systems, 2nd Ed, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga.

Woods L B & Perry-Holmes C (1982) ‘The flak if we had The Joy of Sex here’, Library Journal, vol.107, no.16, pp.1711-1715.

Archive Staff Only: edit this record

|     E-LIS is hosted by AEPIC at CILEA     |     Powered by GNU Eprints software|