As bibliotecas e o percurso histórico de abertura da ciência: revendo um roteiro de colaboração

Revez, Jorge As bibliotecas e o percurso histórico de abertura da ciência: revendo um roteiro de colaboração. Palabra Clave (La Plata), 2019, vol. 9, n. 1. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of 2019 REVEZ As bibliotecas e o percurso histórico - Vfinalfinal.pdf]
Preview
 Text
2019 REVEZ As bibliotecas e o percurso histórico - Vfinalfinal.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (711kB) | Preview

English abstract

Science is currently marked by movements of tension and rupture, increasingly sharp and in cycles of short duration. Open Access, Open Data, Open Science, among others, are fundamental operative concepts in the relationship between libraries and science production and dissemination. This work is a literature review, that seeks to follow the historical roadmap of collaboration between libraries and the opening of science. Outlining the scenario that marks science today – from the Open Access to Open Science movement – the intention is to understand to what extent this landscape influences the role of libraries in scientific research. The objective is to provide a general picture of Open Science, focusing on the theoretical implications that this landscape entails for libraries. The main issue is to understand, on the one hand, what Open Access and Open Science mean for libraries and how they are behaving in the face of these dynamics; on the other hand, how researchers view the role of libraries in this broad and new scientific landscape. These issues will be observed in a review structure divided into three parts: Open Access origins, the emergence of Open Science, and the role of libraries in opening science. It is concluded that libraries participated from the beginning in the process of opening science and continue to strive today to play a relevant role in this social and cultural process.

Spanish abstract

La ciencia está marcada actualmente por movimientos de tensión y ruptura, cada vez más agudos y en ciclos de corta duración. El Acceso Abierto, los Datos Abiertos, la Ciencia Abierta, entre otros, son conceptos operativos fundamentales en la relación entre las bibliotecas y la producción y difusión de la ciencia. Este trabajo es una revisión de la literatura que busca seguir la hoja de ruta histórica de colaboración entre bibliotecas y la apertura de la ciencia. Esbozando el escenario que marca la ciencia hoy en día, desde el movimiento de Acceso Abierto a Ciencia Abierta, la intención es comprender hasta qué punto este panorama influye en el papel de las bibliotecas en la investigación científica. El objetivo es proporcionar una imagen general de la Ciencia Abierta, centrándose en las implicaciones teóricas que este panorama conlleva para las bibliotecas. El tema principal es comprender, por un lado, qué significan el Acceso Abierto y la Ciencia Abierta para las bibliotecas y cómo se comportan frente a estas dinámicas; por otro lado, cómo los investigadores ven el papel de las bibliotecas en este amplio y nuevo panorama científico. Estos problemas se observarán en una estructura de revisión dividida en tres partes: orígenes de Acceso Abierto, el surgimiento de la Ciencia Abierta y el papel de las bibliotecas en la apertura de la ciencia. Se concluye que las bibliotecas participaron desde el principio en el proceso de apertura de la ciencia y continúan esforzándose hoy por desempeñar un papel relevante en este proceso social y cultural.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Acesso Aberto, Ciência Aberta, Bibliotecas, Produção e Disseminação da Ciência, Acceso abierto, Ciencia abierta, Producción y diseminación de la ciencia
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DI. Science libraries.
Depositing user: Jorge Revez
Date deposited: 11 Dec 2019 12:26
Last modified: 11 Dec 2019 12:26
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/39308

References

Albagli, S. (2015). Open science in question. Em S. Albagli, M. L. Maciel, e A. H. Abdo (Eds.), Open Science, open issues (pp. 9-25). Brasília: IBICT. Obtido de http://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/1/1061

Bartling, S., e Friesike, S. (Eds.). (2014). Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8

Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003). Obtido de https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm

Budapest Open Access Initiative [BOAI] (2002). Declaration after the Open Society Institute meeting in Budapest December 1-2 2001. Budapest: Open Society Institute. Obtido de http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml

Budapest Open Access Initiative [BOAI] (2017). Dez anos depois da Budapest Open Access Initiative: estabelecendo o Acesso Aberto como padrão. Obtido de https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/boai-10-translations/portuguese

Borges, M. M. (2006). A esfera: Comunicação académica e novos media (Tese de doutoramento). Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra. Obtido de http://hdl.handle.net/10316/8557

Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Stanford, CA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Bueno de la Fuente, G. (2016a). Libraries: roles and opportunities on Open Science. Obtido de https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/1426

Bueno de la Fuente, G. (2016b). What is Open Science? Introduction. Obtido de https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/node/1420

Cardoso, G., Jacobetty, P., e Duarte, A. (2012). Para Uma Ciência Aberta. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais.

Clay, D. (2016). Building scalable and sustainable services for researchers. Em A. Mackenzie e L. Martin (Eds.), Developing digital scholarship: emerging practices in academic libraries (pp. 121-138). London: Facet publishing.

Comissão Europeia (2012). Recomendação da Comissão de 17 de julho de 2012 sobre o acesso à informação científica e a sua preservação (2012/417/UE). Jornal Oficial da União Europeia, L194, 39–43. Obtido de https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32012H0417&from=PT

Comissão Europeia. (2018). Recomendação (UE) 2018/790 da Comissão de 25 de abril de 2018 sobre o acesso à informação científica e a sua preservação. Jornal Oficial da União Europeia, L134, 12-18. Obtido de https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/PT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0790&from=EN

David, P. A. (2008). The Historical Origins of «Open Science»: An Essay on Patronage, Reputation and Common Agency Contracting in the Scientific Revolution. Capitalism and Society, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1040

Esposito, A. (2013). Neither digital or open. Just researchers. Views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university. First Monday, 18(1). Obtido de https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3881/3404

European Commission. (2017). Guidelines to the rules on Open Access to Scientific Publication and Open Access to Research Data in Horizon 2020 - version 3.2. European Commission. Obtido de http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/oa_pilot/h2020-hi-oa-pilot-guide_en.pdf

Fecher, B. e Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. Em S. Bartling e S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing (pp. 17-48). Cham: Springer. Obtido de https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-00026-8

Friend, F. J. (2006). Towards open access to UK research. Em N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects (pp. 161-167). Oxford: Chandos.

Garvey, W. D. (1979). Communication: the essence of science: facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Geresteyn, D. van. (2014). What scholars think about open access: An overview of the developments in scholars’ awareness and attitude towards open access publishing between 1992 and 2014 (Dissertação de mestrado). Leiden University, Leiden. Obtido de https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/29761

IFLA (2003). IFLA Statement on Open Access to Scholarly Literature and Research Documentation. Obtido de https://www.ifla.org/publications/ifla-statement-on-open-access-to-scholarly-literature-and-research-documentation

Jorge, V. e Albagli, S. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu e a produção do conhecimento científico: reflexões sobre uma ciência aberta. Em R. M. Marteleto e R. M. Pimenta (Eds.), Pierre Bourdieu e a produção social da cultura, do conhecimento e da informação (pp. 207-228). Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.

Kennedy, M. L. (2018). The Opportunity for Research Libraries in 2018 and Beyond [Post-Print]. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 18(4), 629-637.

LIBER (2018). LIBER Open Science Roadmap. Em F. Grant (Ed.). [S.l.]: LIBER. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1303002

Mackenzie, A. e Martin, L. (Eds.) (2016). Developing digital scholarship: emerging practices in academic libraries. London: Facet publishing.

Martin, L. (2016). The university library and digital scholarship: a review of the literature. Em A. Mackenzie e L. Martin (Eds.), Developing digital scholarship: emerging practices in academic libraries (pp. 3-22). London: Facet publishing.

McNinch, J. H. (1949). The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, London, June 21-July 2, 1948. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 37(2), 136-141. Obtido de http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC194801/

Moore, S. A. (2017). A genealogy of open access: negotiations between openness and access to research. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 11, 1-16. Obtido de http://rfsic.revues.org/3220

OCDE (2015). Making Open Science a Reality. Paris: OECD Publishing. Obtido de http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en

Open Science and Research Initiative (2014). Open Science and Research Handbook. Obtido de https://avointiede.fi/documents/14273/0/Open+Science+and+Research+Handbook+v.1.0/50316d5d-440b-4496-b039-2997663afff8

Pontika, N., Knoth, P., Cancellieri, M., e Pearce, S. (2015). Fostering Open Science to Research using a Taxonomy and an eLearning Portal. Em iKnow: 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data Driven Business. Graz, Austria. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809563.2809571

Research Information Network e Consortium of Research Libraries (2007). Researchers’ use of academic libraries and their services. Obtido de http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/Researchers-libraries-services-report.pdf

Santos, P. X. dos, Almeida, B. de A., e Henning, P. (Eds.). (2017). Livro Verde - Ciência aberta e dados abertos: mapeamento e análise de políticas, infraestruturas e estratégias em perspectiva nacional e internacional. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz.

Suber, P. (2004). Praising progress, preserving precision. SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 77. Obtido de https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4736612/suber_praising.htm?sequence=1

Suber, P. (2012). Open access. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

The Royal Society. (2012). Science as an open enterprise. London: The Royal Society. Obtido de https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf

Weller, M. (2011). The Digital Scholar: How Technology Is Transforming Scholarly Practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS