Student satisfaction with online teaching in times of COVID-19

Sáiz-Manzanares, María-Consuelo and Casanova, Joana and Lencastre, José-Alberto and Almeida, Leandro Student satisfaction with online teaching in times of COVID-19. Comunicar, 2022, vol. 30, n. 70, pp. 35-45. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
 Text (Research article (English))
c7003en.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (435kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
 Text (Research article (Español))
c7003es.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Download (451kB) | Preview

English abstract

Higher education is one of the driving forces behind the social and economic development of countries, with the ultimate aim of providing quality academic training. At present, teaching-learning models in virtual environments face a number of important challenges, particularly in the current situation caused by COVID-19. Some of these challenges will be addressed in this study. We worked with 225 third-year undergraduate students in health science degrees over two academic years during the pandemic. The objectives were: (1) to ascertain whether there were significant differences in student satisfaction with the teaching process in the first year of the pandemic (e-learning teaching) vs. the second year (b-learning teaching); (2) to determine whether there were significant differences in academic performance between the two groups. Quantitative research (using a 2x2 factorial design, ANOVA and ANCOVA) and qualitative research (using a comparative design with categorisation analysis) were carried out. The results indicate differences in some aspects of satisfaction and learning outcomes in favour of teaching in the second of the two years. Students rated the use of active methodologies and technological resources positively, although they concluded that their use required more work time. Future studies will seek to compare student satisfaction in other areas of knowledge.

Spanish abstract

La Educación Superior es uno de los motores del desarrollo social y económico de los países, teniendo como objetivo último el de facilitar una formación académica de calidad. En la actualidad, los modelos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en entornos virtuales implican retos importantes, específicamente en la actual situación por la COVID-19. Algunos de estos desafíos se abordarán en este estudio. Se trabajó con 225 estudiantes de tercero de grado en titulaciones de Ciencias de la Salud, a lo largo de dos cursos académicos impartidos durante la situación de pandemia. Los objetivos fueron: 1) comprobar si existían diferencias significativas en la satisfacción de los estudiantes con el proceso docente respecto del primer año de pandemia (se aplicó docencia e-Learning) vs. el segundo año (se aplicó docencia b-Learning); 2) comprobar si existían diferencias significativas en los resultados académicos entre ambos grupos. Se realizó una investigación cuantitativa (se utilizó un diseño factorial 2x2, ANOVA y ANCOVA) y otra cualitativa (se utilizó un diseño comparativo con análisis de categorización). Los resultados indican diferencias en algunos aspectos de la satisfacción y en los resultados de aprendizaje, a favor de la docencia en el segundo año. Los estudiantes valoraron positivamente el uso de metodologías activas y de recursos tecnológicos, si bien concluyeron que su uso exigía más tiempo de trabajo. Futuros estudios se dirigirán a contrastar la satisfacción de estudiantes en otras ramas de conocimiento.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Online learning; technology innovation; satisfaction; project based learning; digital competence; COVID-19; Aprendizaje en línea; innovación tecnológica; satisfacción; aprendizaje basado en proyectos; competencia digital; COVID-19
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BJ. Communication
G. Industry, profession and education.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
Depositing user: Alex Ruiz
Date deposited: 21 Dec 2021 14:47
Last modified: 21 Dec 2021 14:47
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/42723

References

Anguera, M.T., Blanco-Villaseñor, A., Losada, J.L., & Portell, M. (2018). Guidelines for designing and conducting a study that applies observational methodology. Anuario de Psicologia, 48(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpsic.2018.02.001

Atlas.ti (Ed.) (2020). Software package qualitative data analysis. (Versión 9) [Software]. Atlas.ti. https://atlasti.com

Azevedo, R., & Gasevic, D. (2019). Analyzing multimodal multichannel data about self-regulated learning with advanced learning technologies: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.025

Bandalos, D.L., & Finney, S.J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G.A. Marcoulides, & R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601858

Bonami, B.P. (2020). Education, big data and artificial intelligence: Mixed methods in digital platforms. [Educación, big data e inteligencia artificial: Metodologías mixtas en plataformas digitales]. Comunicar, 65, 43-52. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-04

Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (2005). Diseños experimentales y cuasiexperimentales en la investigación social. Amorrortu. https://bit.ly/3i1GKS4

Carbonero, M.A., Román, J.M., & Ferrer, M. (2013). Programa para “aprender estratégicamente” con estudiantes universitarios: Diseño y validación experimental. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 876-885. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.165671

Casanova, J.R., Cervero, A., Núñez, J.C., Almeida, L.S., & Bernardo, A. (2018). Factors that determine the persistence and dropout of university students. Psicothema, 30(4), 408-414. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2018.155

Chakma, U., Li, B., & Kabuhung, G. (2021). Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the covid-19 pandemic. Issues in Educational Research, 31(1), 37-55. https://doi/10.3316/informit.748747335200300

Commission to the european parliament (Ed.) (2020). Communication from the Commission to the european parliament, the council, the european economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. https://bit.ly/3kwseDh

Diaz, M.C.G., & Walsh, B.M. (2021). Telesimulation-based education during COVID-19. Clinical Teacher, 18(2), 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13273

Flick, U. (2014). El diseño de la investigación cualitativa. Morata.

García-Peñalvo, F.J. (2021). Avoiding the dark side of digital transformation in teaching. An institutional reference framework for elearning in higher education. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042023

García-Perales, R., & Almeida, L. (2019). An enrichment program for students with high intellectual ability: Positive effects on school adaptation. [Programa de enriquecimiento para alumnado con alta capacidad: Efectos positivos para el currículum]. Comunicar, 60, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3916/C60-2019-04

Garcia-Utrera, L., Figueroa-Rodriguez, S., & Esquivel-Gámez, I. (2014). Modelo de sustitución, aumento, modificación,

Hernandez-Armenteros, J., & Pérez-García, J.A. (2018). La universidad española en cifras 2017-2018. CRUE. https://bit.ly/3hIMLTw

IBM Corp (Ed.) (2016). SPSS Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (Versión 24) [Software]. IBM. https://ibm.co/3hWIls7

Kidess, M., Schmid, S.C., Pollak, S., Gschwend, J.E., Berberat, P.O., & Autenrieth, M. E. (2021). Virtual skills-training in urology: Teaching at the Technical University of Munich during the COVID-19-pandemic. Der Urologe, 60(4), 484-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-020-01431-2

Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70. https://bit.ly/3hMpcci

Leal-Filho, W., Wall, T., Rayman-Bacchus, L., Mifsud, M., Pritchard, D.J., Lovren, V.O., Farinha, C., Petrovic, D.S., & Balogun, A.L. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 and social isolation on academic staff and students at universities: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21(1213), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11040-z

Li, W., Gillies, R., He, M., Wu, C., Liu, S., Gong, Z., & Sun, H. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to online medical and nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspectives from international students from low- and middle-income countries and their teaching staff. Human Resources for Health, 19(64), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00609-9

Lowe, A., Pararajasingam, A., & Goodwin, R.G. (2021). A paradigm shift in trainee confidence in teledermatology and virtual working during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a follow-up UK-wide survey. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, 46(3), 544-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.14498

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Joint Research Centre (JRC) Science for Policy report. https://bit.ly/3exbvfn

Román-Sánchez, J.M., & Gallego-Rico, S. (2008). ACRA. Estrategias de aprendizaje. TEA

Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C. (2018). E-project based learning en terapia ocupacional: Una aplicación en la asignatura «Estimulación Temprana». Universidad de Burgos. https://bit.ly/3rxKJsw

Sáiz-Manzanares, M.C., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Muñoz-Rujas, N., Rodríguez-Arribas, S., Escolar-Llamazares, M.C., Alonso-Santander, N., Martínez-Martín, M.Á., & Mercado-Val, E.I. (2021). Teaching and learning styles on moodle: An analysis of the effectiveness of using stem and non-stem qualifications from a gender perspective. Sustainability, 13(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031166

Salinas-Ibáñez, J., & De-Benito, B. (2020). Construction of personalized learning pathways through mixed methods. [Construcción de itinerarios personalizados de aprendizaje mediante métodos mixtos]. Comunicar, 65, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-03

Sarwa, M., Rosnelli, R., Triatmojo, W., & Priyadi, M. (2021). Implementation of Flipped Classroom on experiences in online learning during pandemic COVID-19 for a Project-Base Vocational Learning Guide. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012019

Sucha, V., & Gamme, J.F. (2021). Humans and societies in the age of artificial intelligence. https://bit.ly/3io4I8R

Tang, Y.M., Chen, P.C., Law, K.M.Y., Wu, C.H., Lau, Y., Guan, J., He, D., & Ho, G.T.S. (2021). Comparative analysis of student’s live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Computers & Education, 168, 104211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211

Unesco (Ed.) (2019). Marco de competencias de los docentes en materia de TIC. Unesco. https://bit.ly/2UWub13

United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Ed.) (2021). Agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs. https://bit.ly/3x3WlVf

y redefinición (SAMR): Fundamentos y aplicaciones. In I. Esquivel-Gámez (Ed.), Los modelos tecno-educativos: Revolucionando el aprendizaje del siglo XXI (pp. 205-220). DSAE-Universidad Veracruzana. https://bit.ly/3ikS7n8


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS