Indicadores bibliométricos y econométricos en la evaluación de instituciones científicas

Rousseau, Ronald Indicadores bibliométricos y econométricos en la evaluación de instituciones científicas. ACIMED, 2001, vol. 9, n. Supl.. [Journal article (Unpaginated)]

[thumbnail of sci08100.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
sci08100.pdf
Download (97kB) | Preview

English abstract

This article consists of two parts: the first part describes the evaluation of a small university it is based on scientometric data and aims mainly at the evaluation of internationally visible research. The second part shows how an econometric method (DEA: data enveloping analysis) can be used to include teaching and other aspects, e.g. fund raising, into the evaluation. Both approaches show how a body of bibliometric, scientometric and econometric theory can be applied to real world problems.

Spanish abstract

Este artículo consta de 2 partes. La primera describe la evaluación de una pequeña universidad a partir de datos cienciométricos, con el objetivo principal de analizar la investigación con visibilidad internacional. La segunda parte muestra cómo un método econométrico (DEA: data enveloping analysis) puede aplicarse entre otros aspectos como medio de evaluación para determinar los recursos disponibles. Asimismo se demuestra cómo un cuerpo teórico que combina la bibliometría, la cienciometría y la econometría puede aplicarse a problemas concretos.

Item type: Journal article (Unpaginated)
Keywords: Cienciometria, investigacion, evaluacion, econometria/métodos, factor de impacto, analisis de citas, produccion cientifica, publicacion electronica, bibliometria, universidades/eficiencia, universidades/efectividad, scientometrics, research, evaluation, econometrics/methods, impact factor, citation analysis, scientific production, electronic publishing, bibliometrica universities/efficiency, universities/effectiveness
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information
Depositing user: Cuerpo Editorial ACIMED
Date deposited: 28 Jul 2004
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 11:59
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/5164

References

Van Raan AFJ, ed. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988

Egghe L Rousseau R. Introduction to infometrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990.

Wallace D P. A solution in search of a problem: bibliometrics & libraries. Libr J 1987; (112): 43-7.

Rousseau R. A scientometric study of the scientific publications of LUC Period 1981-1993: report [Flanders], 1995.

De Bruin R Kint A Luwel M. A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent Res Evaluat, 1993; (3):35 -41.

De Bruin R, Moed H F, Spruyt E. Antwerpse analyses. Antwerpen: CWTS. Leiden en UIA, 1993.

Moed H F, Burger W J M, Frankfort J G. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Res Policy 1985;(4):131-49.

Oppenheim C. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments.

J Document 1995; (51):18-27.

Abelson P. Mechanisms for evaluating scientific information and the role of peer review J Am Soci Inform Sci 1990; (41):216-22.

Wallmark JT, Sedig K G. Quality of research measured by citation method and by peer review a comparison. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 1986; (33):218-22.

Garfield E. How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations and when isit relevant. Part I Curr Contents 1983;(44):

Arunachalam S. Science in the European Community the extent of collaboration. Curr Sci 1992; (63):56-8.

Rousseau R. Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. En: Egghe L, Rousseau R, eds. Informetrics 87/88 249-62.

Van Hooydonk G, Gevaert R, Milisproost G. A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factores of scientific disciplines. Scientometrics 1994; (30):65-81.

Rousseau R. Evolution d? importantes revues pharmacologiques. Rev Fr Bibliométrie, n. 5, p. 102-17, 1989.

Rousseau R, Spinak, E. Do a field list of internationally visible journals and their journal impact factors depend on the initial set of journals? A research proposal. J Document 1996; (52):449-56.

Cole S, Cole J R. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. Am Sociol Rev 1967; (32):377-90.

Collins MP, Berge ZL. IPCT Journal: a case study of an electronic journal on the internet J Am Soci Inform Sci 1994; (45):771-6.

Norman M, Stoker B. Data envelopment analysis: the assessment of performance. Chicester: Wiley 1991.

Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Operat Res 1978; 2(6):429-44.

Arcelus F J, Coleman D F. An efficiency review of university departments. Int J Syst Sci 1997; 28(7):721-9.

Beasley J E. Determining teaching and research efficiencies. J Operat Res Soc n. 46. p 1995; (45):441-52.

Degraeve Z, Lambrechts M, Van Puymbroeck V. E en vergelijkende prestatiestudie van de departementen van de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Tijdsch Econ Manag 1996; (41):165-93.

Pedraja-Chaparro F, Salinas Jimenez J, Smith P On the rle of weight restictions in data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 1997; (8):215-30.

Johnes G, Johnes J. Apples and oranges: the aggregation problem in publications analysis Scientometrics 1992; (25):353-65.

Rousseau S, Rousseau R. Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructin scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1997; (40):45-56.

___ Measuring the scientific wealth of European nations: taking effectiveness into account Scientometrics 1998; (42):75-87.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS