|   homepage   |   about E-LIS   |   browse   |   search   |   help   |   classification schema   |   submission guidelines   ||
| Login/Your pages | Create Account|

Öz-Yeterlik İnancı ve Bilgi Profesyonelleri İçin Önemi

Kurbanoğlu, S. Serap (2004) Öz-Yeterlik İnancı ve Bilgi Profesyonelleri İçin Önemi. [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
71Kb Language: Turkish

Alternative Locations: http://uvt.ulakbim.gov.tr/uvt/index.php?cwid=9&vtadi=TSOS&ano=38277_288884d8dc7e105ca6d5b5318c60fe41

Abstract(s)

Self-efficacy refers to a belief in one’s ability to successfully perform a particular behaviour or task. Self-efficacy is a factor which influence human behaviour. People’s actions are based more on what they believe than on what is objectively true. Teaching/teacher efficacy, on the other hand, is defined as teachers’ belief in their ability to affect student performence and achievement, and has a strong relationship with teaching effectiveness. In this paper, not only “self efficacy” and “teaching efficacy” concepts, but also their importance for information professionals are discussed.

Öz-yeterlik, kişinin bir işi başarıyla yapmak için gerekli becerilere sahip olduğu konusundaki inancıdır. Öz-yeterlik inancı insan davranışlarını etkiler. İnsan davranışları, gerçekte doğru olandan çok, insanların neyin doğru olduğu yolundaki inancına dayanır. Öğretme/öğretmen yeterliği ise, öğretmenlerin, öğrencilerin performanslarını ve başarılarını etkileme yeteneklerine olan inançları şeklinde tanımlanır ve öğretmenin etkililiği ile yakından ilişkilidir. Bu makalede, “öz-yeterlik” ve “öğretme/öğretmen yeterliği” olguları üzerinde durulmakta ve bilgi profesyonelleri için önemi tartışılmaktadır.

Item Type:Journal Article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords:Öz-yeterlik, öğretme yeterliği, öğretmen yeterliği, bilgi profesyonelleri, self-efficacy, teaching efficacy, teacher efficacy, information professionals
Subjects:G. Industry, profession and education. > GH. Education.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CE. Literacy.
Full Metadata:Show all fields
ID Code:5931
Deposited By:Comlekci, Kamil
Deposited On:28 Mar 2006
Last Modified:19 Nov 2008 10:10
Statistics:View statistics for this eprint

Akkoyunlu, B. ve Kurbanoğlu, S. (2003). Öğretmen adaylarının bilgi okuryazarlığı ve bilgisayar öz-yeterlik algıları üzerine bir çalışma. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24, 1-10.

American Association of School Librarians ve Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1988). Information power: Guidelines for school library media programs. Chicago: ALA.

American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy: A position paper on information problem solving. 21 Temmuz 2003 tarihinde http://www.ala.org/aasl/positions/PS_infolit.html adresinden erişildi.

Anderson, R., Greene, M. ve Loewen, P. (1988). Relationships among teachers’ and students’ thinking skills, sense of efficacy, and student achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34 (2), 148-165).

Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35, 28-32.

Ashton, P. T. ve Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.

Association of College and Research Libraries (2001). Objectives for information literacy instruction: A model statement for academic librarians. 19 Şubat 2004 tarihinde ACRL web sitesinden erişildi: http://www.ala.org/acrl/acrlstandards/objectivesinformation.htm

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self efficacy. V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.). Encylopedia of human behavior içinde (Cilt 4, ss. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.

Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personel and collective efficacy in changing socities. A. Bandura (Ed.) Self-efficacy in changing socities içinde (ss. 1-45). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bawden, D. (2001). Information literacy and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57, 192-217.

Carson, C. H. (1993). The development of a scale to measure the self-efficacy of school media specialists. School Library Media Quarterly, 21, 165-170.

Cassidy, S. ve Eachus, P. (2002). Developing the computer self-efficacy (CSE) scale: Investigating the relationship between CSE, gender and experience with computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26, 133-153.

Compeau, D. R. Ve Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, June, 189-211.

Delcourt, M. ve Kinzie, M. (1993). Computer technologies in teacher education: The measurement of attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 31-37.

Gawith, G. (1995). A serious look at self-efficacy: Or waking beeping Slooty. 8 Nisan 2003 tarihinde http://www.theschoolquarterly.com/info_lit_archive/learning_thinking/95_g_g_aslasewbs.htm adresinden erişildi.

Gibson, S. ve Dembo, M. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569-582.

Gordon, C., Lim, L., McKinnon, D. ve Nkala, F. (1998). Learning approach, control orientation and self-efficacy of beginning teacher education students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 1 (1), 53-63.

Grassian, E. S. ve Kaplowitz, J. R. (2001). Information literacy instruction: Theory and practice. New York: Neal-Schuman.

Havard, B. C. ve Atkinson, F. D. (t. y.). Factors influencing computer self-efficacy in an introductory level computer course. 6 Kasım 2001 tarihinde http://itechl.coe.uga.edu/designconference/PDFs/20.pdf adresinden erişildi.

Henson, R. K. (2001). Teacher self-efficacy: Substantive implications and measurement dilemmas. Annual Meeting of the Educational Research Exchange, January 26, 2001, Texas A & M University’de sunulan bildiri.

Henson, R. K., Kogan, L. R. ve Vacha-Haase, T. (2001). A reliability generalization study of the teacher efficacy scale and related instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61 (3), 404-420.

Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307-313.

Karsten, R. Ve Roth, M. R. (1998). The relationship of computer experience and computer self-efficacy to performance in introductory computer literacy courses. Journal of Research on Technology Education, 31(1), 14-24.

Koul, R. ve Rubba, P. (1999). An analysis of the reliability and validity of personal Internet teaching efficacy beliefs scale. Electronic Journal of Science Education. 27 Aralık 2002 tarihinde http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/koulrubba.html adresinden erişildi.

Kurbanoğlu, S. (2003). Self-efficacy: a concept closely linked to information literacy and lifelong learning. Journal of Documentation, 59, 635-646.

Lin, S. S. J. ve Tsai, C. (t.y.). Teaching efficacy along the development of teaching expertise among science and math teachers in Taiwan. 30 Temmuz 2003 tarihinde http://www.educ.sfu.ca/narstsite/conference/lintsai/lintsai.htm adresinden erişildi.

Markless, S. (2002). Learning about learning rather than about teaching. 68th IFLA Council and General Conference, August 18-24, 2002, Glasgow’da sunulan bildiri.

Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H. ve Eccles, J. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 247-258.

Neely, T. Y. (2002). Sociological and psychological aspects of information literacy in higher education. Lanham, Maryland: The Scarecrow.

Oberman, C. (2002). What he ACRL Institute for Information Literacy Best Practices Initiative tells us about the librarian as teacher. 68th IFLA Council and General Conference, August 18-24, 2002, Glasgow’da sunulan bildiri.

Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. 26 Aralık 2002 tarihinde http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/MFP/eff.html adresinden erişildi.

Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy an the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17 (1), 51-65.

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1-28.

Smylie, M. (1990). Teacher efficacy at work. P. Reyes (Ed.), Teachers and their workplace içinde (ss. 48-66). Newbury Park, Cal.: Sage Pub.

Stein, M. K. ve Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 171-187.

Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.

Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2002). The influence of resources and support on teachers’ efficacy beliefs. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April 2, 2002. New Orleans, LA’da sunulan bildiri.

Tschannen-Moran, M. ve Woolfolk Hoy, A., Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Rview of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.

Woolfolk, A. E. ve Hoy, W. K. (1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 81-91.

Archive Staff Only: edit this record

|     E-LIS is hosted by AEPIC at CILEA     |     Powered by GNU Eprints software|