E-LIS, Eprints in Library and Information Science Homepage E-LIS, Eprints in Library and Information Science
   home   |   about   |   search   |   browse   |   register   |   registered users area   |   help   |   FAQ   |   JITA   

Annotating the Web: An Exploratory Study of Web Users' Needs for Personal Annotation Tools

Fu, Xin and Ciszek, Tom and Marchionini, Gary and Solomon, Paul (2005) Annotating the Web: An Exploratory Study of Web Users' Needs for Personal Annotation Tools. In Grove, Andrew, Eds. Proceedings 68th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST) 42, Charlotte (US).

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

View statistics for this eprint

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates the needs Web users have to make annotations for their personal use when they
view Web pages. Three forms of annotations observed on printed documents - text selection and emphasis,
association building, and document re-segmentation - are examined in the Web environment. The study shows that text selection and association building through notes or symbols remain the dominant forms of annotation on the Web,
while structural annotation (re-segmentation) and layout annotation (change of font, color, etc.) are also prevalent. The study also investigates users' preferences for the tools designed to facilitate Web annotation practices. Findings
suggest that usability is of utmost importance when developing Web annotation tools, and that under the current
technical conditions, users welcome lightweight annotation functions, which are built into standard Web browsers.

Keywords:information behavior ; workplace ; search strategies ; search characteristics
Subjects:B. Information use and sociology of information. > BI. User interfaces, usability.
ID Code:5095
Deposited By:Medeiros, Norm
Deposited On:09 March 2006
All fields:Show all fields

Abrams, D., Baecker, R., & Chignell, M. (1998). Information archiving with bookmarks: personal Web space construction and

organization. Proceedings of CHI ’98, (pp. 41-48). ACM Press.

Bush, V. (1945). As We May Think. Retrieved December 28, 2004 from http://www.ps.unisb.de/~duchier/pub/vbush/vbush.shtml

Chia, C. & Garcia, J. (2002). The personalization challenge in public libraries: perspectives and prospects. Retrieved January 19, 2005 from http://www.public-libraries.net/html/x_media/pdf/personalisation_engl.pdf

Chong, N. S. T., Sakauchi, M. (2001). Creating and sharing Web notes via a standard browser. Proceedings of the 2001 ACM symposium on applied computing (pp.99-104). ACM Press.

Denoue, L. (1999). Adding Metadata to Improve Retrieval: Yet Another Web Annotation System. Retrieved June 1, 2005 from

http://www.fxpal.com/people/denoue/publications/TR1999-01.pdf

Denoue, L. & Vignollet, L. (2000). New ways of using Web annotations. Retrieved December 15, 2004 from http://www9.org/finalposters/poster46.html

Garfunkel, J. (1999). Web Annotation Technologies. Retrieved January 2, 2005 from http://look.boston.ma.us/garf/webdev/annote/software.html

Heck, R. M., Luebke, S. M., & Obermark, C. H. (1999). A Survey of Web Annotation Systems. Retrieved December 27, 2004 from: http://www.math.grin.edu/~rebelsky/Blazers/Annotations/Summer1999/Papers/survey_paper.html.

Jones, W. P., Dumais, S., & Bruce, H. (2002). Once Found, What Next?: A Study of "Keeping" Behaviors in the Personal Use of Web Information. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of American Society for Information Science and Technology (ASIST 2002), 391-402.

Leuf, B., & Cunningham, W. (2001). The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the Web. Addison-Wesley Longmann.

MacMullen, W. J. (2005). Annotation as Process, Thing, and Knowledge: Multi-domain studies of structured data annotation. SILS Technical Report TR-2005-02. UNC School of Information and Library Science.

Marshall, C. (1998). Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Proceedings of ACM Hypertext '98, Pittsburgh, PA (June 20-24,1998). 40-49.

Marshall, C., Brush, A. J. (2004). Exploring the relationship between personal and public annotations. JCDL ’04. 349-357.

Mu, X., Marchionini, G., & Pattee, A., (2003). The Interactive Shared Educational Environment: User interface, system architecture and field study. In Proceedings of the third ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries (JCDL), Houston, TX (May 27-31, 2003). 291-300.

O’Hara, K., Sellen A. (1997). A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. CHI ’97</>. ACM Press. 335-343

Ovsiannikov, I. A., Arbib, M. A., McNeill, T. H. (1999). Annotation Technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50(4): 329-362.

Rainie, L. (2005). The State of Blogging. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved January 14, 2005 from

http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_blogging_data.pdf

Ramos, A. (2004). FAQ: What Is a Blog? Retrieved January 2, 2005 from http://www.andreas.com/faq-blog.html.

Ramos, G. & Balakrishnan, R. (2003). Fluid interaction techniques for the control and annotation of digital video. In Proceedings of ACM UIST ’03 (pp. 105-114). Vancouver, BC.

Zohar, R. (1999). Web Annotation – an Overview. Retrieved January 2, 2005 from http://dlp.cs.berkeley.edu/cgibin/

pl_dochome?format=pdf&collection=Digital_Documents&id=55&show_doc=yes

Archive Staff Only: edit this record