E-LIS, Eprints in Library and Information Science Homepage E-LIS, Eprints in Library and Information Science
   home   |   about   |   search   |   browse   |   register   |   registered users area   |   help   |   FAQ   |   JITA   

Price and value of electronic journals: A survey at the Indian Institute of Science

Galyani Moghaddam, Golnessa (2006) Price and value of electronic journals: A survey at the Indian Institute of Science. Libri 56(2):pp. 108-116.

Full text available as:
PDF - Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader or other PDF viewer.

Abstract

This paper focuses on analyzing the most used scholarly electronic journals at a multi-disciplinary research institute in India, the Indian Institute of Science (IISc). Analysis of the top thirty journals at IISc showed that two-thirds of the thirty top journals belong to non-profit/society publishers and one-third belongs to for-profit/commercial publishers. There is a remarkable difference between the prices that for-profit/commercial publishers charge to libraries for scholarly journals and the prices that non-profit/ society publishers and university presses charge. This price difference does not appear to reflect a difference in quality as measured by number of recorded citations to a journal/impact factor and use of journal.

Keywords:Scholarly journals, Journal price, Usage study, Indian Institute of Science, India
Subjects:H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
ID Code:8018
Deposited By:Galyani Moghaddam, Golnessa
Deposited On:04 December 2006
All fields:Show all fields

Barschall, Henry H. 1986. The Cost of Physics Journals. Physics Today. vol. 39, no. 12 (December): 34-36.

Barschall, Henry H. 1988. The Cost-Effectiveness of Physics Journals. Physics Today, vol. 41, no. 7 (July): 56-59.

Bergstrom, Theodore C. 2001. Free Labor for Costly Journals? [Viewed July 15, 2002], URL: http://www.econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/Journals/jeppdf.pdf

Bergstrom, C T. and Bergstrom, T C. 2004. The Costs and Benefits of Library Site Licenses to Academic Journals. PNAS, vol. 101, no. 3, (January 20): 897-902.

Galyani Moghaddam, G. 2006. Scholarly Electronic Journal Publishing: A Study Comparing Commercial and Non-profit/University Publishers. The paper has been accepted for publishing in the Serials Librarian, Vol. 51, No. 3/4, 2006.

Hoeffel C. Journal impact factors [letter]. Allergy (1998), 53: 1225.

Kean, Gene. 2005. 18th Annual Study of Journal Prices for Scientific and Medical Society Journals: 2005 Pricing Trends for U.S. Society Journals and Ten Recommendations for Pricing 2006 Volumes. “JP, The Newsletter for Journal Publishers”, 2005, No. 3. [Viewed January 12, 2006], URL: http://www.allenpress.com/static/newsletters/pdf/JP-2005-03.pdf

Loughner, William. 1999. Top Ten Science Publishers Take 76 Percent of Science Budget. Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues, No. 221, (May 20).

Rusch-Feja, Diann and Siebeky, Uta. 1999. Evaluation of Usage and Acceptance of Electronic Journals. D-Lib Magazine, (October). [Viewed May 25, 2005], URL: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-summary.html

Sales and Earnings Improve at Reed Elsevier. 2003. Publishers Weekly, vol. 250, no. 9 (March 3): 28.

Wilder, Stanley J. 1998. Comparing Value and Estimated Revenue of SciTech Journals. ARL Report, (October). Washington, DC: ARL.

Archive Staff Only: edit this record