¿Evaluar la calidad de los recursos Web o simplemente filtrarlos?

Silberg, W. M.; Lundberg, G. D.; Musacchio, R. A. (1997). “Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor – let the reader and viewer beware”. JAMA, vol. 277, n. 5, pp. 1244-1245.

Greer, T.; Holinga, D.; Kindel, C.; Netznik, M. (1999). Why evaluate Web information. <http://www.lrs.ed.uiuc.edu/wp/credibility/page1.htm>

Meadow, C. T.; Boyce, B. R.; Kraft, D. H. (2000). Text Information Retrieval Systems. Second edition. California: Academic Press.

Lancaster, F. W. (1996). Evaluación de la biblioteca. Madrid: ANABAD.

Abad García, Ma F. (1997). Investigación evaluativa en Documentación. Aplicación a la Documentación Médica. Valencia: Universidad de Valencia. Servicio de Publicaciones.

Salvador Oliván, J. A. (2000). “La Estadística como herramienta fundamental para el profesional de la información en el entorno empresarial y Centros de Investigación”. En: Actas de las VII Jornadas Españolas de Documentación. Bilbao: Universidad del Pais Vasco, pp. 29-38.

Sparck Jones, K.; Willet, P. (1997). Readings in information retrieval. San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann.

World Wide Web Consortium. Web Characterization Terminology & Definitions Sheet. W3C Working Draft 24-May-1999. <http://www.w3.org/1999/05/WCA-terms/>

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. (1999). ISBD(ER): International Standard Bibliographic Description for Electronic Resources. <http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/pubs/isbd2.htm>

Association for Library Collections and Technical Series (A division of the Amercian Library Association). Cataloging and Classification Section. Committee on Cataloging: Description and Access. (1999). Task Force on Harmonization of ISBD(ER) and AACR2. Final Report. pp 74. <http://www.libraries.psu.edu/iasweb/personal/jca/ccda/tf-harm3.pdf>

Roswitha, P.; Boekhorst P. (1998). Medición de la calidad: directrices internacionales para la edición del rendimiento en las bibliotecas universitarias. Versión española de Ramón Abad Hiraldo y Belén Altuna Esteibar. Madrid: ANABAD.

International Organization for Standarization, Technical Committee ISO/TC 176. (1994). ISO 8402: Quality management and quality assurance-Vocabulary. 2nd. ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standarization.

Information Market Observatory (IMO. (1995). The quality of electronic information products and services. Luxembourg, September 1995. <http://158.169.50.95:10080/imo/en/9504.html>

Hofman, P.; Worsfold, E.; Hiom, D.; Day, M.; Oehler, A. (1996). DESIRE-Development of a European service for information on research and education. <http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/DESIRE/quality/report.rtf>

Codina, L. (2000). “Evaluación de recursos digitales en línea: conceptos, indicadores y métodos”. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, vol. 23, n. 1, pp. 9-43.

Nielsen, J. (2000). Usabilidad. Diseño de sitios Web. Madrid: Pearson Educación.

Cooke, A.; McNab, A.; Anagnostellis, B. (1996). “The good, the bad and the ugly: Internet review sites”. En: D. Raitt and B. Jeapes (eds). Online Information 96: Proceedings of the 20th International Online Information Meeting, London, 3-5 December 1996. Oxford: Learned Information, pp. 33-40. <http://biome.ac.uk/sage/iolim96.html>

Wang, R. Y.; Strong, D. M. (1997). “Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers”. Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 12, n. 4, pp. 5-34.

Cambridge Research Group (1997). Information quality assessment survey: Administrator’s guide. Cambridge, MA: CRG.

Strong, D. M.; Lee, Y. W.; Wang, R. Y. (1996). “Data quality in context”. Communications of the ACM, vol. 40, nº 5, pp. 103-110.

Huang, K-T; Lee, Y. W.; Wang, R. Y. (2000). Calidad de la información y gestión del conocimiento. Madrid: AENOR.

Rolph, P.; Bartram, P. (1994). The information agenda: harnessing relevant information in a changing business environment. London: Management Books 2000.

Ciolek, T. M. (1996). “The six quests for the electronic grail: Current approaches to information quality in WWW resources”. Review Informatique et Statistique dans les Sciences Humaines, n. 1-4, pp. 45-71. <http://www.ciolek.com/PAPERS/QUEST/QuestMain.html>

Oliver, K. M.; Wilkinson, G. L.; Bennett, L. T. (1997). “Evaluating the quality of Internet information sources”. Paper Presented at The Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), ED-MEDIA/ED-TELECOM 97, Calgary, AB, Canada. <http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/kmoliver/webeval/AACE97.html>

Bennett, L., Wilkinson, G., Oliver, K. (1996). “The development and validation of instruments to assess the quality of Internet information: A progress report”. Paper Presented at The Annual Convention of the Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), ED-MEDIA 96, Boston Massachusetts. <http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/kmoliver/webeval/AACE96paper.html>

BIOME Special Advisory Group on Evaluation. (2001). Factors affecting the quality of an information source. <http://biome.ac.uk/guidelines/eval/factors.html>

Centrale Santé. Net Scoring: critères de qualité de l’information de santé sur l’Internet. 12 April 2001 (version 3). <http://www.chu-rouen.fr/netscoring>

CISMeF. Catalogue et Index des Sites Médicaux Francophones. <http://www.chu-rouen.fr/cismef/>

Anagnostellis, B.; Cooke, A.; McNab, A. (1997). “Thinking critically about information on the Web”. Vine, vol. 104, pp. 21-28. <http://biome.ac.uk/sage/vine.html>

Anagnostellis, B.; Cox, J. (1996). “Data on the Internet: evaluating the quality or less is more”. En: C. J. Armstrong and R. J. Hartley (eds). ukolug96@warwick.ac.uk: UKOLUG State-of-the-Art Conference Warwick 17-19 July 1996, London: UKOLUG. pp.59-69. <http://biome.ac.uk/sage/ukolug.html>

McNab, A.; Anagnostelis, B. (1997). “Never mind the quality, check the badge-width!”. Ariadne vol. 9, pp.5-6. <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue9/quality-ratings/>

Impicciatore, P.; Pandolfini, C.; Casella, N.; Bonati, M. (1997). “Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home”. BMJ, vol. 314, pp. 1875-1879.

Ciolek, T.M. (1999). Information quality – some definitions. <http://www.ciolek.com/WWWVLPages/QltyPages/QltyDefinitions.html>

Eysenbach, G.; Diepgen, T. L. (1998). “Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information”. BMJ vol. 317, pp. 1496-1500. <http://www.bmj.com>

Jadad, A. R.; Gagliardi, A.G. (1998). “Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel?”. JAMA, vol. 279, pp. 611-614.

Horvat, J.; Sarlija, N. (2000). “How to develop an algorithm in order to choose the appropiate measurement instrument”. Developments in Survey Methodology, pp. 109-123. <http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/mz/mz15/horvat.pdf>

Zhang, X.; Keeling, K.B.; Pavur, R.J. (2000). “Information quality of commercial Web site home pages: an explorative analysis”. Fundamental Concepts for the New Millennium. Twenty-First Annual International Conference on Information Systems. Brisbane, Australia, 10-13 December 2000. <http://www.commerce.uq.edu.au/icis/ProgramFinal.pdf>

Auer, N. J. (2001). Bibliography on evaluating Internet resources. <http://borneo.lib.vt.edu/research/libinst/evalbiblio.html>

Wyatt, J. C. (1997). “Measuring quality and impact on the World Wide Web”. BMJ, vol. 314, pp. 1879-1881.

Internet Healthcare Coalition (2000). EHealth Code of Ethics. <http://www.ihealthcoalition.org/ethics/code0254.pdf>

Health On the Net Foundation (1997). HON Code of Conduct (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. Version 1.6, April 1997. <http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Conduct.html>

Ingwersen, P. (1998). “The calculation of Web Impact Factors”. Journal of Documentation, vol. 54, n. 2, pp. 236-243.

Aguillo, I. F. (2000). “Indicadores hacia una evaluación objetiva (cuantitativa) de sedes web”. En: Actas de las VII Jornadas Españolas de Documentación. Bilbao: Universidad del Pais Vasco, pp.233-248.

Sanvick, H. (1999). “Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinence”. BMJ, vol. 319, nº 7201, pp. 29-32.

Pandolfini, C.; Impicciatore, P.; Bonati, M. (2000). “Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children”. Pediatrics, vol. 105, n. 1, pp. 1-8.