<mods:mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Which Route Do I Take?  A Viewpoint on Locally-Developed vs. Commercially Available Journal Management Solutions</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Steve</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Oberg</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This article discusses the growing need for tools or systems that will provide more effective management of and improved user access for journal collections, especially for e-journals. The author briefly describes initial efforts at the local library level to develop management systems and mentions the rise of vendor-supplied solutions, which have become very popular. In spite of the current popularity of vendor-based solutions, the author argues that there is still a niche for locally developed journal management systems. One such system, developed at the author's home institution, Taylor University, is featured as a case study.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">LN. Data base management systems.</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">JB. Serials management.</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">HN. e-journals.</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">HP. e-resources.</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">LQ. Library automation systems.</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2004</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Preprint</mods:genre></mods:mods>