E-LISSelf-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciencesKristinAntelmanauthorAuthors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so-called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers’ self-archiving policies have no influence on author self-archiving practice.ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft.HS. Repositories.2006Association of Learned and Professional Society PublishersJournal Article (Print/Paginated)

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant E-LIS the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that E-LIS does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at E-LIS) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.