<mods:mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-0.xsd"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Kristin</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Antelman</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Authors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so-called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of 
self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of 
the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines 
investigated. Publishers’ self-archiving policies have 
no influence on author self-archiving practice.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright, copyleft.</mods:classification><mods:classification authority="lcc">HS. Repositories.</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2006</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Journal Article (Print/Paginated)</mods:genre></mods:mods>