6023 1 archive 718 disk0/00/00/60/23 2006-04-12 2008-11-19 09:11:47 2008-11-19 09:11:47 journalp show Authors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so-called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines investigated. Publishers’ self-archiving policies have no influence on author self-archiving practice. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/staff/kantelman/antelman_self-archiving.pdf Antelman Kristin pub open access ; self-archiving en 2 85-95 FALSE Learned Publishing Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers TRUE Watkinson, A. Securing authenticity of scholarly paternity and integrity, Book Industry Communication, 2003. Frankel, M. S., et al. Defining and certifying electronic publication in science: a proposal to the International Association of STM Publishers. Learned Publishing, 2000:13(4) Lynch, C. When documents deceive: trust and provenance as new factors for information retrieval in a tangled web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2001:52(1) Rowlands,I.and Nicholas,D.New journalpublishing models: an international survey of senior researchers. A CIBER report for the Publishers Association and the International Association of STM Publishers, 2005 Swan, A. and Brown, S. Open access self-archiving: an author study. Key Perspectives Limited, 2005 Harnad, S. and Brody, T. Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 2004: June. Kurtz, M. J.,Eichhorn, G.,Accomazzi,A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., and Murray, S. S. Worldwide use and impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital library, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005:56(1) Antelman, K. Do open access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 2004:65(5) Wren, J.D. Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet. BMJ, 2005:330. Mabe,M.A.and Amin,M.DrJekylland Dr Hyde: author–reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. Aslib Proceedings, 2002:54(3). Guédon, J. C. The ‘green’ and ‘gold’ roads to open access: the case for mixing and matching. Serials Review, 2004:30(4) Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., and Probets, S. RoMEO Studies 3: how academics expect to use open-access research papers. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 2003:35(3). Guédon, J. C. The ‘green’ and ‘gold’ roads to open access: the case for mixing and matching. Serials Review, 2004:30(4). SHERPA Publisher Copyright Policies & Self- archiving (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeoinfo.html). Frankel, M. S.,Elliott, R.,Blume,M., Bourgois,J.M., Hugenholtz, B., Lindquist, M. G., Morris, S., and Sandewell, E. Defining and certifying electronic publication in science. Learned Publishing, 2000:13 (4) Gadd, E.,Oppenheim, C.,Probets,S.RoMEO Studies4: an analysis of journal publishers’ copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 2003:16(4). Pinfield, S. How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine, 2001: Dec, 5. JISC Disciplinary Differences Report, Sparks, S., Rightscom Ltd, 2005, 49. Gadd, E. and Oppenheim, C. RoMEO Studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self- archiving. Journal of Documentation, 2003:59(3) Ober, J. Postprint Repository Services: Context and Feasibility at the University of California, Final Draft, 2005. Goodman, D. The criteria for open access. Serials Review, 2004:30(4). Pinfield, S. How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for institutional e-print services, D-Lib Magazine, 2001: Dec, 5. (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html). Wren,J.D.Open access and openly accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via the internet. BMJ, 2005:330. Watkinson, A. Securing authenticity of scholarly paternity and integrity, Book Industry Communication, 2003. Whitley, R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000. Becher,T.and Trowler, P. R. Academic Tribes and Territories, The Society for Research into Higher Education,& Open University Press, 2001. ‘What Authors Want’: the ALPSP research study on the motivations and concerns of contributors to learned journals. Learned Publishing, 1999:12 (3). King, R., Spector, L., and McKim, G. The guild model. Journal of Electronic Publishing 2002:8(1). Guédon, J. C. In Oldenburg’s long shadow: librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing. In ARL (Association of Research Libraries) Proceedings, 138. May 2001 Membership Meeting, 22. Fry, J. Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach. Information Processing & Management 2006:42. ED HS US- 19 published 2006 public 4521 1 6023 1 application/pdf en public

antelman_self-archiving.pdf

antelman_self-archiving.pdf 4078969 http://eprints.rclis.org/6023/1/antelman_self-archiving.pdf