|
|
E-LIS. E-prints in Library and Information Science >
List of countries by continent >
ASIA >
Iran >
Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated) >
Noruzi, A. Folksonomies- Why do we need controlled vocabulary?, 2007. In Webology. Webology. (Published) [Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated)].
See the references list of this item
Citable URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10308
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | Visibility |
|---|
| Folksonomies-_Why_do_we_need_controlled_vocabulary.pdf | | 49.39 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open
|
|
| Author(s): | Noruzi, Alireza |
| Title: | Folksonomies- Why do we need controlled vocabulary? |
| Subjects: | I. Information treatment for information services > IC. Index languages, processes and schemes
I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Data and metadata structures
H. Information sources, supports, channels > HQ. Web pages
L. Information technology and library technology > LS. Search engines
L. Information technology and library technology > LC. Internet, including WWW |
| Date: | 2007 |
| Abstract: | The Web consists of diverse information collections in terms of the type of content, context, format and quality. However, this diversity, as good as it is, often brings
challenges for users in their web information seeking activities. The technologies such as wiki, blog, RSS, and folksonomy that build Web 2.0 present an opportunity
to share knowledge and facilitate interactions between users and computers. One of the main challenges of Web 1.0 was that users were not engaged in information
organization. Currently folksonomy-based systems (e.g., Del.icio.us) engage users in bookmarking and introducing their favorites. |
| Publication: | Webology |
| Volume: | 4 |
| Number: | 2 |
| Publisher: | Webology |
| Alternative Locations: | http://www.webology.org/2007/v4n2/editorial12.html |
| Keywords: | Web 2.0, Folksonomy, Knowledge Organization, Classification, Thesaurus |
| Country: | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| Type: | Journal Article (On-line/Unpaginated) |
| Rights: | http://eprints.rclis.org/copyright/ |
|
References
- Buckland, M. (1999). Vocabulary as a central concept in library and information science. In Digital Libraries: Interdisciplinary Concepts, Challenges, and Opportunities. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS3, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 23-26 May 1999). Ed. By T. Arpanac et al. Zagreb: Lokve, pp. 3-12.
- Folksonomy (2007, May 6). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy
- Guy, M., & Tonkin, E. (2006), Folksonomies: Tidying up tags? D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 12(1). Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january06/guy/01guy.html
- Lancaster, F.W. (1979). Information retrieval systems: Characteristics, testing and evaluation. 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
- Macgregor, G., & McCulloch, E. (2006). Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review, 55(5): 291-300.
- Mika, P. (2005). Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In Proceedings of 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), 2005, pp. 522-536.
- Milstead, J.L. (2000). About thesauri. Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://www.bayside-indexing.com/Milstead/about.htm
- Niwa, S., Doi, T., & Honiden, S. (2006). Web page recommender system based on folksonomy mining. Information Processing Society of Japan (IPSJ) Journal, 47(5): 1382-1392.
- Noruzi, A. (2006). Folksonomies: (Un)Controlled Vocabulary? Knowledge Organization, 33(4), 199-203.
- Shirky, C. (2005). Ontology is overrated: Categories, links and tags. Retrieved November 25, 2006, from http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html
- Yang, K. (2005). Information Retrieval on the Web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST), 39 (1), 33-80.
|
