E-LIS logo Global map logo and E-LIS moto

E-LIS. E-prints in Library and Information Science > List of countries by continent > AMERICA: North and Central America > Canada > Conference Paper >

Kipp, M.E. Searching with Tags: Do Tags Help Users Find Things?, 2008. In 10th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization,Montreal, Quebec, Canada,5-8 August 2008.(Unpublished) [Conference Paper].

See the references list of this item

Citable URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/12247

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormatVisibility
mkipp-iskopaper2008.pdf132.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Author(s): Kipp, Margaret E.I.
Title: Searching with Tags: Do Tags Help Users Find Things?
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Data and metadata structures
Date: 2008
Abstract: This study examines the question of whether tags can be useful in the process of information retrieval. Participants were asked to search a social bookmarking tool specialising in academic articles (CiteULike) and an online journal database (Pubmed) in order to determine if users found tags were useful in their search process. The actions of each participants were captured using screen capture software and they were asked to describe their search process. The preliminary study showed that users did indeed make use of tags in their search process, as a guide to searching and as hyperlinks to potentially useful articles. However, users also made use of controlled vocabularies in the journal database.
Conference: 10th International Conference of the International Society for Knowledge Organization
Conference Date: 5-8 August 2008
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Keywords: tagging, folksonomies, search, information retrieval, citeulike, pubmed
Country: Canada
Type: Conference Paper
Rights: http://eprints.rclis.org/copyright/



References

  • Allen, Laurie; Winkler, Michael. (2007). PennTags: Creating and Using an Academic Social Bookmarking Tool. In Proceedings of the ACRL 13th National Conference, Baltimore, MD, March 29-April 1, 2007.
  • Beghtol, Clare. (2003). Classification for Information Retrieval and Classification for Knowledge Discovery: Relationships between "Professional" and "Naive" Classifications. Knowledge Organization 30(2): 64-73.
  • Bowker, Geoffrey C.; Star, Susan Leigh. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Fast, Karl V.; Campbell, D. Grant. 2004. ‘I still prefer Google’: University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the Web. In Proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Providence, Rhode Island, November 13-18, (2004) (Vol. 41, pp. 138-146).
  • Hammond, Tony; Hannay, Timo; Lund, Ben; Scott, Joanna. (2005). Social Bookmarking Tools (I): A General Review. D-Lib Magazine 11(4). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html
  • Jones, William; Phuwanartnurak, Ammy Jiranida; Gill, Rajdeep; Bruce, Harry. (2005). Don't Take My Folders Away! Organizing Personal Information to Get Things Done. CHI 2005, April 2-7 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Kipp, Margaret E.I. (2006). Complementary or Discrete Contexts in on-line Indexing: A Comparison of User, Creator and Intermediary Keywords. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science. Preprint at: http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1533/ (forthcoming)
  • Kipp, Margaret E.I.; Campbell, D. Grant. (2006). Patterns and Inconsistencies in Collaborative Tagging Practices: An Examination of Tagging Practices. In Proceedings Annual General Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, TX, November 3-8, 2006. http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1704/
  • Kipp, Margaret E. I. (2007). @toread and Cool: Tagging for Time, Task and Emotion. Proceedings of the 8th Information Architecture Summit, Las Vegas, March 22-26. http://dlist.sir.arizona.edu/1947/
  • Kwasnik, Barbara. (1991). The Importance of Factors That Are Not Document Attributes in the Organisation of Personal Documents. Journal of Documentation 47(4): 389-98.
  • Malone, Thomas W. (1983). How Do People Organize Their Desks? Implications for the Design of Office Information Systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 1(1): 99-112.
  • Mathes, Adam. (2004). Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html
  • Oppenheim, Charles; Morris, Anne; McKnight, Cliff. (2000). The Evaluation of WWW Search Engines. Journal of Documentation 56(2): 190-211.
  • Quintarelli, E.; Resmini, A.; Rosati, L. (2006). FaceTag: Integrating Bottom-up and Top-down Classification in a Social Tagging System. Proceedings of the 2nd European Information Architecture Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 30-October 1.
  • Shirky, Clay. (2005). Ontology is Overrated: Categories, Links, and Tags. http://shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html
  • Trant, Jennifer. (2006). Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: proof of concept. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 12(1): 83 - 105. http://www.archimuse.com/papers/steve-nrhm-0605preprint.pdf

 

E-LIS is supported by
CIEPI logo AePIC team @ CILEA logo CILEA logo Duraspace logo DSpace logo FAO AIMS logo