E-LIS logo Global map logo and E-LIS moto

E-LIS. E-prints in Library and Information Science > List of countries by continent > OCEANIA > Australia > Conference Paper >

Boell, S.K., Wilson, C.S., & Cole, F.T.H. A webometric analysis of Australian Universities using staff and size dependent web impact factors (WIF), 2008. In Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting,Berlin (Germany),28 July -1 August 2008.Institute for Library and Information Science (IBI). pp.1-13. (Published) [Conference Paper].

See the references list of this item

Citable URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/12287

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormatVisibility
BoellWIS2008waa-final.pdf555.31 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Author(s): Boell, Sebastian K.
Wilson, Concepción S.
Cole, Fletcher T. H.
Title: A webometric analysis of Australian Universities using staff and size dependent web impact factors (WIF)
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
H. Information sources, supports, channels > HQ. Web pages
L. Information technology and library technology > LC. Internet, including WWW
Date: 2008
Abstract: This study describes how search engines (SE) can be employed for automated, efficient data gathering for Webometric studies using predictable URLs. It then compares the usage of staffrelated Web Impact Factors (WIFs) to sizerelated impact factors for a ranking of Australian universities, showing that rankings based on staffrelated WIFs correlate much better with an established ranking from the Melbourne Institute than commonly used sizedependent WIFs. In fact sizedependent WIFs do not correlate with the Melbourne ranking at all. It also compares WIF data for Australian Universities provided by Smith (1999) for a longitudinal comparison of the WIF of Australian Universities over the last decade. It shows that sizedependent WIF values declined for most Australian universities over the last ten years, while staffdependent WIFs rose.
Conference: Fourth International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Ninth COLLNET Meeting
Conference Date: 28 July -1 August 2008
Location: Berlin (Germany)
Starting page: 1
Ending page: 13
Editor(s): Kretschmer, Hildrun
Havemann, Frank
Publisher: Institute for Library and Information Science (IBI)
Alternative Locations: http://www.collnet.de/Berlin-2008/BoellWIS2008waa.pdf
Keywords: Webometrics, Web Impact Factor, Australia, University Ranking, Informetrics, Inlinks, .edu, .edu.au, .ac.uk, University staff
Country: Australia
Type: Conference Paper
Rights: http://eprints.rclis.org/copyright/



References

  • Aguillo, Isidro F. (1998). STM information on the Web and the development of new Internet R&D databases and indicators. In: Raitt D. (Ed.). Proceedings Online Information Meeting 98. London : Learned Information. 239-243.
  • Aguillo, Isidro F.; Granadino, Begoña; Ortega, Jose Luis; & Prieto, Jose Antonio (2005). What the Internet says about Science. Universites can be ranked on web indicators. The Scientist. 19(14). 10.
  • Aguillo, Isidro F.; Granadino, Begoña; Ortega, Jose Luis; & Prieto, Jose Antonio (2006). Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetric indicators. Journal of the American Society for the Information Science and Technology. 57(10). 1296-1302.
  • Bar-Ilan, Judit (2004). The use of Web search engines in information science research. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 38. 231-288.
  • Bharat, Krishna; Chang, Bay-Wei; Henzinger, Monika; & Ruhl, Matthias (2001). Who links to whom: mining linkage between web sites. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM). 51-58.
  • Björneborn, Lennart; & Ingwersen, Peter (2001). Perspectives of Webometrics. Scientometrics. 50(1). 65-82.
  • Björneborn, Lennart; & Ingwersen, Peter (2004). Toward a Basic Framework for Webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(14). 1217-1227.
  • Chen, Chaomei; Newman, Julian; Newman, Rhona; & Rada, Roy (1998). How did university departments interweave the Web: Astudy of connectivity and underlying factors. Interacting with Computers. 10(4). 353-373.
  • Cybermetrics Lab (2008). Webometrics Ranking of World Universities. [online] http://www.webometrics.info/about_rank. html Accessed: 17.2.2008.
  • Department of Education, Science and Training, Australia (1999). Staff 1999: selected higher education statistics. [online] http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/indigenous_education/publications_resources/documents/staff99shes_pdf Accessed: 24.05.2008.
  • Department of Education, Science and Training, Australia (2007). Staff 2006: selected higher education statistics. [online] http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/publications_resources/profiles/Staff_2006_selected_higher_education_statistics.htm Accessed: 24.05.2008.
  • Ingwersen, Peter (1998). The calculation of Web Impact Factors. Journal of Documentation. 54(2). 236-243.
  • Ingwersen, Peter; & Björneborn, Lennart (2004). Methodological Issues of Webometric Studies. In: Moed, Henk F.; Glänzel, Wolfgang; Schmoch, Ulrich (Eds.). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research : The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers. 339-369.
  • Li, Xuemei; Thelwall, Mike; Musgrove, Peter; & Wilkinson, David (2003). The relationship between the WIFs or inlinks of Computer Science Departments in UK and their RAE ratings or research productivities in 2001. Scientometrics. 57(2). 239.
  • Noruzi, Alireza (2006). The Web Impact Factor: A Critical Review. The Electronic Library. 24(4). 490-500.
  • Onyancha, Omwoyo Bosire; & Ocholla, Dennis N. (2007). The Performance of South African and Kenyan Universities on the World Wide Web: a Web Link Analysis. Cybermetrics. 11(1). Paper 2. [online] http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v11i1p2.html Accessed: 24.05.2008
  • Page, Lawrence; Brin, Sergey; Motwani, Rajeev; & Winograd, Terry (1998). The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Stanford Digital Library Technologies Project. [online] http://dbpubs.stanford.edu:8090/pub/1999-66. Accessed: 24.05.2008
  • Rousseau, Ronald (1997). Sitations: An exploratory study. Cybermetrics. 1(1). Paper 1. [online] http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/articles/v1i1p1.html Accessed: 24.05.2008
  • Smith, Alastair G. (1999). A tale of two Web spaces: Comparing sites using Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation. 55(5). 577-592.
  • Smith, Alastair G.; & Thelwall, Mike (2002). Web Impact Factors for Australasian universities. Scientometrics. 54(3). 363-380.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2000). Web impact factors and search engine coverage. Journal of Documentation. 56. 185-189.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2001a). A web crawler design for data mining. Journal of Information Science. 27(5). 319-325.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2001b). Results from a Web impact factor crawler. Journal of Documentation. 56(2). 177-191.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2001c). Extracting macroscopic information from web links. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 52(13). 1157-1168.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2002a). Conceptualizing documentation on the Web: An evaluation of different heuristic-based models for counting links between university Web sites. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 53(12). 995-1005.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2002b). A comparison of sources of links for academic Web impact factor calculation. Journal of Documentation. 58(1). 66-78.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2002c). Evidence for the existence of geographic trends in university web site interlinking. Journal of Documentation. 58(5). 563-574.
  • Thelwall, Mike (2003). What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation. Information Research. 8(3). Paper 151. [online] http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper151.html Accessed: 24.05.2008
  • Thelwall, Mike; & Harries, Gareth (2003). The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages: An investigation based on a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 54(7). 594-602.
  • Thelwall, Mike; & Harries, Gareth (2004). Do the Web sites of higher rated scholars have significantly more online impact?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 55(2). 149-159.
  • Thelwall, Mike; & Wilkinson, David (2003). Three target document range metrics for university Web sites. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 54(6). 490-497.
  • Thelwall, Mike; Vaughan, Liwen; & Björneborn, Lennart (2005). Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. 39(1). 81-135.
  • Williams, Ross (2007). Ranking Australian Universities: Controlling for Scope. [online] http://melbourneinstitute.com/publications/reports/uniscope/mainpaper.pdf. Accessed: 15.4.2008.
  • Wouters, Paul; Hellsten, Iina; & Leydesdorff, Loet (2004). Internet Time and the Reliability of Search Engines. First Monday. 9(10). Paper 1. [online] http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_10/wouters/index.html Accessed: 20.5.2008

 

E-LIS is supported by
CIEPI logo AePIC team @ CILEA logo CILEA logo Duraspace logo DSpace logo FAO AIMS logo