|
|
E-LIS. E-prints in Library and Information Science >
List of countries by continent >
AMERICA: North and Central America >
United States >
Journal Article (Print/Paginated) >
Antelman, K. Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences, 2006. In Learned Publishing. Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers. pp.85-95. (Published) [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)].
See the references list of this item
Citable URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10760/7420
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | Visibility |
|---|
| antelman_self-archiving.pdf | | 3.98 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open
|
|
| Author(s): | Antelman, Kristin |
| Title: | Self-archiving practice and the influence of publisher policies in the social sciences |
| Subjects: | E. Publishing and legal issues > ED. Intellectual property: author's rights, ownership, copyright and copyleft
H. Information sources, supports, channels > HS. Repositories (OAI-compliant and not) |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Abstract: | Authors in different disciplines exhibit very different behaviours on the so-called ‘green’ road to open access, i.e. self-archiving. This study looks at the self-archiving behaviour of authors publishing in leading journals in six social science disciplines. It tests the hypothesis that authors are self-archiving according to the norms of their respective disciplines rather than following self-archiving policies of publishers, and that, as a result, they are self-archiving significant numbers of publisher PDF versions. It finds significant levels of
self-archiving, as well as significant self-archiving of
the publisher PDF version, in all the disciplines
investigated. Publishers’ self-archiving policies have
no influence on author self-archiving practice. |
| Publication: | Learned Publishing |
| Volume: | 19 |
| Number: | 2 |
| Starting page: | 85 |
| Ending page: | 95 |
| Publisher: | Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers |
| Alternative Locations: | http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/staff/kantelman/antelman_self-archiving.pdf |
| Keywords: | open access ; self-archiving |
| Country: | United States |
| Type: | Journal Article (Print/Paginated) |
| Rights: | http://eprints.rclis.org/copyright/ |
|
References
- Watkinson, A. Securing authenticity of scholarly
- paternity and integrity, Book Industry Communication,
- 2003.
- Frankel, M. S., et al. Defining and
- certifying electronic publication in science: a proposal
- to the International Association of STM Publishers.
- Learned Publishing, 2000:13(4)
- Lynch, C. When documents deceive:
- trust and provenance as new factors for information
- retrieval in a tangled web. Journal of the American
- Society for Information Science and Technology,
- 2001:52(1)
- Rowlands,I.and Nicholas,D.New journalpublishing
- models: an international survey of senior researchers.
- A CIBER report for the Publishers Association and
- the International Association of STM Publishers,
- 2005
- Swan, A. and Brown, S. Open access self-archiving:
- an author study. Key Perspectives Limited, 2005
- Harnad, S. and Brody, T. Comparing the impact
- of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same
- journals. D-Lib Magazine, 2004: June.
- Kurtz, M. J.,Eichhorn, G.,Accomazzi,A., Grant, C.,
- Demleitner, M., and Murray, S. S. Worldwide use and
- impact of the NASA Astrophysics Data System digital
- library, Journal of the American Society for Information
- Science and Technology, 2005:56(1)
- Antelman, K. Do open access articles have a greater research
- impact? College & Research Libraries, 2004:65(5)
- Wren, J.D. Open access and openly
- accessible: a study of scientific publications shared via
- the internet. BMJ, 2005:330.
- Mabe,M.A.and Amin,M.DrJekylland Dr Hyde:
- author–reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing.
- Aslib Proceedings, 2002:54(3).
- Guédon, J. C. The
- ‘green’ and ‘gold’ roads to open access: the case for
- mixing and matching. Serials Review, 2004:30(4)
- Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., and Probets, S.
- RoMEO Studies 3: how academics expect to use
- open-access research papers. Journal of Librarianship
- and Information Science, 2003:35(3).
- Guédon, J. C. The ‘green’ and ‘gold’ roads to open
- access: the case for mixing and matching. Serials
- Review, 2004:30(4).
- SHERPA Publisher Copyright Policies & Self-
- archiving (http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeoinfo.html).
- Frankel, M. S.,Elliott, R.,Blume,M., Bourgois,J.M.,
- Hugenholtz, B., Lindquist, M. G., Morris, S., and
- Sandewell, E. Defining and certifying electronic
- publication in science. Learned Publishing, 2000:13
- (4)
- Gadd, E.,Oppenheim, C.,Probets,S.RoMEO Studies4:
- an analysis of journal publishers’ copyright agreements.
- Learned Publishing, 2003:16(4).
- Pinfield, S. How do physicists use an e-print archive? Implications for
- institutional e-print services. D-Lib Magazine, 2001:
- Dec, 5.
- JISC Disciplinary Differences Report, Sparks, S.,
- Rightscom Ltd, 2005, 49.
- Gadd, E. and Oppenheim, C. RoMEO Studies 1: the impact of
- copyright ownership on academic author self-
- archiving. Journal of Documentation, 2003:59(3)
- Ober, J. Postprint Repository Services:
- Context and Feasibility at the University of
- California, Final Draft, 2005.
- Goodman, D. The criteria for open access. Serials
- Review, 2004:30(4).
- Pinfield, S. How do physicists use an e-print archive?
- Implications for institutional e-print services, D-Lib
- Magazine, 2001: Dec, 5. (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/
- december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html).
- Wren,J.D.Open access and openly accessible: a
- study of scientific publications shared via the internet.
- BMJ, 2005:330.
- Watkinson, A. Securing authenticity of scholarly
- paternity and integrity, Book Industry Communication,
- 2003.
- Whitley, R. The Intellectual and Social Organization of
- the Sciences, New York, Oxford University Press, 2000.
- Becher,T.and Trowler, P. R. Academic Tribes and
- Territories, The Society for Research into Higher
- Education,& Open University Press, 2001.
- ‘What Authors Want’: the ALPSP research study on
- the motivations and concerns of contributors to
- learned journals. Learned Publishing, 1999:12 (3).
- King, R., Spector, L., and McKim, G. The guild
- model. Journal of Electronic Publishing 2002:8(1).
- Guédon, J. C. In Oldenburg’s long shadow: librarians,
- research scientists, publishers, and the control of
- scientific publishing. In ARL (Association of Research
- Libraries) Proceedings, 138. May 2001 Membership
- Meeting, 22.
- Fry, J. Scholarly research and information practices: a
- domain analytic approach. Information Processing &
- Management 2006:42.
|
