|
|
E-LIS. E-prints in Library and Information Science >
List of countries by continent >
AMERICA: South America >
Argentina >
Journal Article (Print/Paginated) >
Bosch, M. Ontologies, Different Reasoning Strategies, Different Logics, Different Kinds of Knowledge Representation: Working Together, 2006. In Knowledge Organization. Ergon Verlag. pp.153-159. (Published) [Journal Article (Print/Paginated)].
See the references list of this item
Citable URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10760/9557
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | Visibility |
|---|
| BoschOntologies,_Different_Reasoning_Strategies,_Different_Logics,_Different_Kinds_of_Knowledge_Representation.pdf | | 265.19 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open
|
|
| Author(s): | Bosch, Mela |
| Title: | Ontologies, Different Reasoning Strategies, Different Logics, Different Kinds of Knowledge Representation: Working Together |
| Subjects: | I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Data and metadata structures |
| Date: | 2006 |
| Abstract: | The recent experiences in the building, maintenance and reuse of ontologies has shown that the most efficient approach is the collaborative one. However, communication between collaborators such as IT professionals, librarians, web designers and subject matter experts is difficult and time consuming. This is because there are different reasoning strategies, different logics and different kinds of knowledge representation in the applications of Semantic Web. This article intends to be a reference scheme. It uses concise and simple explanations that can be used in common by specialists of different backgrounds working together in an application of Semantic Web. |
| Other Abstracts: | Las experiencias recientes en la construcción , mantenimiento y reutilización de ontologías han demostrado que el enfoque más eficiente es el de colaboración. Sin embargo, la comunicación entre los colaboradores tales como los profesionales IT, los bibliotecarios, los diseñadores web y los expertos en diferentes temas, es difícil y consume demasiado tiempo. Esto es porque hay diversas estrategias de razonamiento, diversas lógicas y diversas clases de representación del conocimiento en las aplicaciones del Web semántico. Este artículo se prepone ser un esquema de referencia. Utiliza explicaciones sucintas y simples que se pueden utilizar en común por los especialistas de diversos trasfondos cognitivos que trabajan juntas en un uso del Web semántico. |
| Publication: | Knowledge Organization |
| Volume: | Vol. 33 |
| Number: | num 3, mars |
| Starting page: | 153 |
| Ending page: | 159 |
| Publisher: | Ergon Verlag |
| Keywords: | Knowledge Representation, Multidisciplinary Approach, Ontologies, Semantic Web, Enfoque Multidisciplinario, Ontologías, Representación del Conocimiento, Web Semántica |
| Country: | Argentina |
| Type: | Journal Article (Print/Paginated) |
| Rights: | http://eprints.rclis.org/copyright/ |
|
References
- Bosch, Mela. 2001. Documentos y lenguaje de marcado: conceptos, problemas y tendencias (Documents and markup language: concepts, problems and trends). El profesional de la información, 10, (11): 4-9.
- Bryan, Martin. 1998. SGML An author guide. New York: Addison Wesley.
- Davis, Randall; Shrobe, Howard; Szolovits, Peter. 1993. What is a Knowledge Representation? AI Magazine, 14(1):17-33. http://groups.csail.mit.edu/medg/ftp/psz/k-rep.html
- Díaz, Alicia. 2005. CO-Protégé: A Groupware Tool for Supporting Collaborative Ontology Design with Divergence. Lifia, Fac. Informática- UNLP, La Plata, Argentina- Loria, Campus Scientifique, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy cedex, France. http://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2005/slides/6.2_A.Diaz_Co-Protege_slices_and_flyer.pdf.
- Gnoli, Claudio and Poli, Roberto. 2004. Levels of Reality and Levels of Representation. Knowledge Organization, 31, (3): 151-160.
- Gruber, Tom. .2004. Interview. In: http://www.sigsemis.org/newsletter/october2004/tom_gruber_interview_sigsemis
- Hodgson, Ralph and Keller, Paul. 2005. Collaborative Ontology-Based Systems. Innovator Perspectives and Demonstrations of New Open Standards and Technologies in Support of Ontology Engineered Solutions. TopQuadrant and NASA Ames. Collaborative Expedition Workshop #38, at NSF Semantic Conflict, Mapping, and Enablement: Making Commitments Together: http://www.topquadrant.com/documents/talks/TQ%20Ontology-Based%20Collaborative%20Environments%20(v4).pdfBased%20Collaborative%20Environments%20(v4).pdf
- Institut für Informatik, Freie Universität Berlin. (2005) Ontology Engineering Cost Estimation with ONTOCOM. http://ontocom.ag-nbi.de//index.html
- ISO 8879:1986. Information processing. Text and office systems. Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) JTC 1/SC 34; ISO Standards 35.240.30.
- Lambrix, Patrick. 2003. Description Logic. Document of : Intelligent Information Systems Laboratory, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden: http://www.ida.liu.se/labs/iislab/people/patla/DL/index.html
- Lassila, Ora and McGuinness, Deborah. 2001. The Role of Frame-Based Representation
- on the Semantic Web. Software Technology Laboratory, Nokia Research Center
- 2Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University. http://www.ida.liu.se/ext/epa/ej/etai/2001/018/01018-etaibody.pdf
- Noy, Natalya F. and McGuinness, Deborah. 2001. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford University: http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology101-noy-mcguinness.html
- Rumbaugh, James; Blaha, Michael; Premerlani, William; Eddy, Frederick; Lorensen, William. 1991. Object Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-629841-9
|
