Evolution of 21st Century Scientific Production Indexed in Web of Science on Old and New Cataloging Standards

Blanco-Olea, Fernando Evolution of 21st Century Scientific Production Indexed in Web of Science on Old and New Cataloging Standards. JLIS.it, 2025, vol. 16, n. 1, pp. 90-107. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of jlis_627_1.pdf]
Preview
 Text
jlis_627_1.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB) | Preview

English abstract

This article examines the evolution of scientific production in the 21st century on new cataloging standards—BIBFRAME, LRM, and RDA—and their predecessors—MARC 21, FRBR, and AACR2, respectively. The primary objective is to determine whether the emergence of new cataloging standards marks a turning point in researchers' interest in studying these standards; and, concurrently, whether old standards still generate interest during this transitional period. For this purpose, bibliographic searches by topic were conducted in the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection from 2001 to 2024, and the collected data were systematized in comparative linear graphs for analysis. The findings indicate persistent interest in MARC 21 and FRBR, albeit decreasing, while interest in AACR2 has completely disappeared, being replaced by interest in RDA. Additionally, the study shows that the official publication of a new standard does not represent a rigid temporal boundary that necessarily marks the beginning of research on this new standard and the end of research on the preceding standard.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Cataloging standards; MARC 21; BIBFRAME; FRBR; RDA.
Date deposited: 15 Sep 2026 05:10
Last modified: 20 Sep 2026 21:39
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/48980

References

Aalberg, Trond, Edward O’Neill, y Maja Žumer. 2021. “Extending the LRM Model to Integrating Resources.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59 (1): 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2021.1876802.

ALA (American Library Association), CLA (Canadian Library Association), y CILIP (Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals). 2010. RDA Resource Description & Access: Brochure. https://www.rdatoolkit.org/archivedsite/docs/rdabrochureJanuary2010.pdf.

ALA (American Library Association), CLA (Canadian Library Association), y CILIP (Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals). 2015. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. https://www.rdatoolkit.org/archivedsite/rda.html.

Ávila-Barrientos, Eder. 2020. “BIBFRAME y el futuro de la descripción, vinculación y recuperación de los recursos de información.” Transinformação (32): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202032e190069.

Bianchini, Carlo, y Mauro Guerrini. 2009. “From Bibliographic Models to Cataloging Rules: Remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the Relationships Between Them.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 47 (2): 105-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802561674.

Carlyle, Allyson. 2006. “Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model - FRBR and the bibliographic universe.” Library Resources & Technical Services 50 (4): 264-73. https://journals.ala.org/index.php/lrts/article/view/5444.

Frank, Paul. 2014. BIBFRAME: Why, What, Who?. http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/bibframe/BIBFRAME%20paper%2020140501.docx.

Gavilán, César Martín. 2008. Temas de Biblioteconomía: El formato MARC: variedades geográficas y de aplicación. MARC 21. https://core.ac.uk/download/11886709.pdf.

Guerrini, Mauro. 2020. Dalla catalogazione alla metadatazione: tracce di un percorso. Roma: Associazione italiana biblioteche. https://www.aib.it/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Estratto-con-indice-prefazione-premessa-e-ringraziamenti-1.pdf.

Hider, Philip, y Saralee Turner. 2006. “The Application of AACR2’s Rules for Personal Names in Certain Languages.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 43 (2): 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v43n02_04.

Howarth, Lynne C., y Jean Weihs. 2007. “Making the Link: AACR to RDA: Part 1: Setting the Stage.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 45 (2): 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v45n02_02.

Howarth, Lynne C., y Jean Weihs. 2008. “Enigma Variations: Parsing the Riddle of Main Entry and the ‘Rule of Three’ from AACR2 to RDA.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 46 (2): 201-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370802177620.

IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2004. Requisitos Funcionales de los Registros Bibliográficos: Informe final. Traducción de Xavier Agenjo y María Luisa Martínez-Conde. [Madrid]: Ministerio de Cultura, Secretaría General Técnica. https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/frbr/frbr-es.pdf.

IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2017. IFLA Library Reference Model: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/123456789/40.

Jin, Qiang, y Jane Sandberg. 2018. “Crafting Linked Open Data to Enhance the Discoverability of Institutional Repositories on the Web.” Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries 7 (4): 595-606. https://qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/505.

Kroeger, Angela. 2013. “The Road to BIBFRAME: The Evolution of the Idea of Bibliographic Transition into a Post-MARC Future.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 51 (8): 873-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2013.823584.

Library of Congress. 2016. Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model. https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html.

Library of Congress. 2024. BIBFRAME Frequently Asked Questions. https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/faqs/#q04.

Long, Chris Evin. 2018. “RDA Implementation in Large US Public Libraries.” Library Resources & Technical Services 62 (3): 98-113. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.62n3.98.

Naun, Chew Chiat, y K.C. Elhard. 2005. “Cataloguing, Lies, and Videotape: Comparing the IMDb and the Library Catalogue.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 41 (1): 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v41n01_03.

Oliveira, Rhuan Henrique Alves de, Fabiano Ferreira de Castro, y Ananda Fernanda de Jesus. 2021. “O impacto do modelo IFLA Library Reference Model na prática catalográfica: casos de uso, vantagens e desvantagens.” Em Questão 27 (4): 359-86. https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245274.359-386.

Ríos Hilario, Ana Belén, y Carlos Díaz-Redondo. 2023. “RDA, mito o realidad en España: análisis del grado de aplicación en las Bibliotecas Públicas del Estado.” Ibersid: revista de sistemas de información y documentación 17 (1): 115-27. https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4904.

Seikel, Michele. 2009. “No More Romanizing: The Attempt to Be Less Anglocentric in RDA.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 47 (8): 741-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903203192.

Seikel, Michele, y Thomas Steele. 2020. “Comparison of Key Entities Within Bibliographic Conceptual Models and Implementations Definitions, Evolution, and Relationships.” Library Resources & Technical Services 64 (2): 62-71. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.64n2.62.

Sewing, Silke. 2023. “KUOPIO 2022: The application of the MARC 583 ‘action note’ in Austria and Germany.” Library Management 44 (5): 367-71. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-11-2022-0113.

Shieh, Jackie. 2018. “Reports from the Program for Cooperative Cataloging Task Groups on URIs. in MARC & BIBFRAME.” JLIS.it 9 (1): 110-19. https://doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-12429.

Texeira, Marcelo Votto, y Ariane Spiassi. 2022. “O resumo como instrumento de recuperação da informação nos catálogos de bibliotecas.” Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação 15 (1): 76-88. https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v15.n1.2022.38303.

Tillett, Barbara B. 2005. “FRBR and Cataloging for the Future.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 39 (3-4): 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v39n03_12.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS