Institutional practices in gender recording: an analysis of National Libraries

Novaes de Mendonça, Ana Carolina and Simionato Arakaki, Ana Carolina Institutional practices in gender recording: an analysis of National Libraries. JLIS.it, 2026, vol. 17, n. 2, pp. 74-93. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of jlis_675_1.pdf]
Preview
 Text
jlis_675_1.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (946kB) | Preview

English abstract

The representation of gender metadata in personal name authority records maintained by national libraries in the Americas and Europe is the central focus of this study. Anchored in contemporary discussions on descriptive practices and standards, the research investigates the application of frameworks such as RDA, alongside metadata encoding formats like MARC21, UNIMARC, and INTERMARC, in the inclusion and treatment of gender-related information. Adopting a descriptive and exploratory methodology, the study examines public authority catalogues and analyses institutional responses to identify how gender is recorded, made visible, or omitted. The findings reveal substantial variation across institutions: while some adopt binary classification models, others employ more inclusive and expanded vocabularies, and certain libraries opt to suppress gender data from public access. The analysis further highlights the potential of semantic web technologies and linked data as ethical and sustainable alternatives, enabling the connection of authority records to external sources such as VIAF, Wikidata, and ORCID. The study concludes that, when managed with responsibility and transparency, gender metadata not only supports academic research and improves data quality but also enhances the visibility of diverse contributions to cultural and scientific production.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Name Authority records; Gender; Linked Data; Semantic Web.
Date deposited: 15 Sep 2026 05:10
Last modified: 15 Sep 2026 05:10
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/48999

References

Adolpho, Kalani. 2019. “Who Asked You? Consent, Self-Determination, and the Report of the PCC Ad Hoc Task Group on Gender in Name Authority Records.” In Ethical Questions in Name Authority Control, edited by Jane Sandberg, 111–31. Sacramento, CA: Library Juice Press.

Berners-Lee, Tim. 2006. “Linked Data.” Design Issues, July 27. https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.

Berners-Lee, Tim, James Hendler, and Ora Lassila. 2001. “The Semantic Web.” Scientific American. https://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/cours/essi2006/Scientific%20American_%20Feature%20Article_%20The%20Semantic%20Web_%20May%202001.pdf.

Billey, Amber, Emily Drabinski, and K. R. Roberto. 2014. “What’s Gender Got to Do with It? A Critique of RDA 9.7.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 52 (4): 412–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.882465.

Burns, Jasmine, Michelle Cronquist, Jackson Huang, Devon Murphy, K. J. Rawson, Beck Schaefer, Jamie Simons, Brian M. Watson, and Adrian Williams. 2022. “Metadata best practices for trans and gender diverse resources.” Librarian Publications & Presentations 52. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/librarians/52.

Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

Carbajal, Itza A. 2020. “Review of Ethical Questions in Name Authority Control.” Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies 7: Article 7. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/jcas/vol7/iss1/7.

Gil, Antonio Carlos. 2008. Métodos e Técnicas de Pesquisa. São Paulo: Atlas.

IFLA (International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions). 2016. “Statement of International Cataloguing Principles.” https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2016-pt.pdf.

Isaac, Antoine, Hugo Manguinhas, Juliane Stiller, and Valentine Charles. 2015. Report on Enrichment and Evaluation. The Hague, Netherlands: Europeana Task Force on Enrichment and Evaluation. http://pro.europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/EuropeanaTech/EuropeanaTech_taskforces/Enrichment_Evaluation/FinalReport_EnrichmentEvaluation_102015.pdf.

Library of Congress. 2018. “MARC 21 Format for Authority Data.” https://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/ecadhome.html.

Library of Congress. 2022. “375 (Gender) R.” https://www.loc.gov/marc/authority/ad375.html.

Lindsey, Nerissa, Kuriger Suiter Greta, Hanselman Kurt. 2022. Ethical Considerations of Including Gender Information in Open Knowledge Platforms.” KULA: Knowledge Creation, Dissemination, and Preservation Studies 6 (3): 1–15 doi: 10.18357/kula.228.

Manguinhas, Hugo, Nuno Freire, Antoine Isaac, Juliane Stiller, Valentine Charles, Aitor Soroa, Rainer Simon, and Vladimir Alexiev. 2016. “Exploring Comparative Evaluation of Semantic Enrichment Tools for Cultural Heritage Metadata.” In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 20th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, TPDL 2016, Hannover, September 5–9, Proceedings 20, 266–78. Springer International Publishing.

Marcondes, Carlos Henrique. 2001 “Representação e economia da informação.” Ciência da Informação 30 (1): 61–70. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ci/v30n1/a08v30n1.

Martin, Jennifer M. 2021. “Records, Responsibility, and Power: An Overview of Cataloging Ethics.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 59 (2–3): 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458.

National Information Standards Organization. 2022. “Gender Identification and Cataloging Practice.” NISO I/O, May. https://www.niso.org/niso-io/2022/05/gender-identification-and-cataloging-practice.

Oliver, Chris. 2021. Introducing RDA: A Guide to the Basics after 3R. 2nd ed. Chicago: ALA Editions.

Olson, Hope A. 2002. The Power to Name: Locating the Limits of Subject Representation in Libraries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

PCC Ad Hoc Task Group on Gender in Name Authority Records. 2022. Revised Report on Recording Gender in Personal Name Authority Records. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/documents/gender-in-NARs-revised-report.pdf.

Pomerantz, Jeffrey. 2015. Metadata. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Possemato, Tiziana. 2025. “Recording Gender in the Person Entity: An Ongoing Discussion.” JLIS.it 16 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.36253/jlis.it-630.

Prodanov, Cleber Cristiano, and Ernani Cesar de Freitas. 2013. Metodologia do Trabalho Científico: Métodos e Técnicas da Pesquisa e do Trabalho Acadêmico. Novo Hamburgo: Feevale. https://www.feevale.br/institucional/editora-feevale/metodologia-do-trabalhocientifico--2-edicao.

Scott, Joan Wallach. 1995. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” Translated from the French version by Guacira Lopes Louro; revised by Tomaz Tadeu da Silva based on the original English text. Educação & Realidade 20 (2): 71–99. https://lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/257862/000037108.pdf.

Seikel, Michele, and Thomas Steele. 2011. “How MARC Has Changed: The History of the Format and Its Forthcoming Relationship to RDA.” Technical Services Quarterly 28 (3): 322–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2011.574519.

Smith-Yoshimura, Karen. 2018. “The Rise of Wikidata as a Linked Data Source.” Hanging Together. https://hangingtogether.org/the-rise-of-wikidata-as-a-linked-data-source/.

Taylor, Arlene. G., and Daniel N. Joudrey. 2009. The Organization of Information. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.

Thompson, Kelly Jean. 2016. “More than a name: A content analysis of name authority records for authors who self-identify as trans.” Library Resources & Technical Services 60 (3): 140-55.

Tillett, Barbara. 2004. “Authority control: State of the art and new perspectives.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 38(3–4): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v38n03_04.

United Nations. 2015. “Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls” Sustainable Development Goals.” United Nations. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/.

Wainer, Luiza. 2019. “Questão de gênero: considerações sobre a inclusão de gênero em registros de autoridade.” In Anais do I Encontro de RDA no Brasil. Florianópolis: Editora da UDESC. https://rdanobrasil.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2019-questao-de-genero-em-registros-de-autoridade-texto.pdf.

Zeng, Marcia Lei. 2019. “Semantic Enrichment for Enhancing LAM Data and Supporting Digital Humanities. Review Article.” Profesional de la Información 28 (1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.ene.03.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS