Awareness of Predatory Journals and Open Access: an online survey among Italian Researchers

Maccarini, Silvia, Bautista-Puig, Núria and Méndez, Eva Awareness of Predatory Journals and Open Access: an online survey among Italian Researchers. JLIS.it, 2026, vol. 17, n. 3, pp. 1-27. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of jlis_720_1.pdf]
Preview
 Text
jlis_720_1.pdf - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (638kB) | Preview

English abstract

This study investigates Italian academics’ awareness, perceptions, and experiences of predatory publishing, a phenomenon recognised as a threat to research integrity and scholarly communication. An online survey of researchers affiliated with Italian universities and research institutes yielded 258 responses, which were analysed. Results show that awareness of predatory publishing is high: almost half of respondents (47.9%) had discussed it with colleagues, and more than one-third had encountered it as authors, reviewers, or readers. Familiarity varies across dimensions, with predatory journals and spam emails being most recognised, and fraudulent websites and podcasts less so. 30% of participants reported personal experience of editorial misleading, mainly as authors, and 76% had received spam or phishing solicitations. Significant differences emerged by professional title and age, with senior researchers demonstrating greater awareness and greater exposure to training. Most participants perceive predatory publishing as having a moderate or high impact on scientific integrity, but only half have received training in research ethics or use verification tools. Open-ended responses show concern about the “publish or perish” culture and the difficulty of distinguishing legitimate from predatory journals. The findings highlight awareness and vulnerability in the Italian academic publishing landscape.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Academic publishing; Predatory publishers and journals; Research communities; Editorial misconduct.
Date deposited: 16 Sep 2026 10:16
Last modified: 16 Sep 2026 10:16
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/49020

References

Abalkina, Anna. 2021. “Detecting a Network of Hijacked Journals by Its Archive.” Scientometrics 126 (8): 7123–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04056-0.

Abalkina, Anna. 2023a. ‘Predatory vs Hijacked Journals: A Commentary to “A ‘Trojan Horse’ in the Reference Lists: Citations to a Hijacked Journal in SSCI-Indexed Marketing Journals.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 49 (6): 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102798.

Anderson, Rick. 2018. Scholarly Communication: What Everyone Needs to Know®. Oxford University Press.

Baccini, Alberto, and Cristina Re. 2025. “Is the Panel Fair? Evaluating Panel Compositions through Network Analysis. The Case of Research Assessments in Italy.” Scientometrics 130 (4): 2093–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05255-9.

Bagues, Manuel, Sylos-Labini, Mauro and Zinovyeva, Natalia. 2019. “A Walk on the Wild Side: ‘Predatory’ Journals and Information Asymmetries in Scientific Evaluations.” Research Policy 48 (2): 462–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.013.

Beall, Jeffrey. 2017. “What I Learned from Predatory Publishers.” Biochemia Medica 27 (2): 2. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029.

Beall, Jeffrey. 2012. “Five Scholarly Open Access Publishers.” The Charleston Advisor 13 (4): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.13.4.5.

Beall, Jeffrey. 2013. “Scholarly Publishing Free for All.” College Quarterly 16 (2). https://collegequarterly.ca/2013-vol16-num02-spring/beall.html.

Berger, Monica. 2017. Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Predatory Publishing but Were Afraid to Ask. CUNY New York City College of Technology Edition. (New York), CUNY New York City College of Technology Edition.

Berger, Monica. 2021. Teaching Authors about Predatory Journals in the One-on-One Consultation. CUNY New York City College of Technology Edition. (New York), CUNY New York City College of Technology Edition.

Bertocchi, Graziella, Gambardella Alfonso, Jappelli Tullio, Nappi, Carmela A., and Franco Peracchi Franco. 2015. “Bibliometric Evaluation vs. Informed Peer Review: Evidence from Italy.” Research Policy 44 (2): 451–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.08.004.

Butler, Declan. 2013. “Investigating Journals: The Dark Side of Publishing.” Nature 495: 433–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/495433a.

Cavalletto, Tommaso, Patrizia Borsellino, and Maurizio Arcari. 2018. ‘DEMOCRAZIE IN CRISI EPISTEMICA: IL SUFFRAGIO UNIVERSALE ALLA PROVA’. Università degli studi di MilanoBicocca. pag.140. https://boa.unimib.it/retrieve/e39773b6-8a34-35a3-e053-3a05fe0aac26/phd_unimib_823205.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Christopher, Mary M., and Yong, Karen M. 2015. “Awareness of “Predatory” Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops.” Frontiers in Veterinary Science 13 (2): 22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2015.00022.

Ciriminna, Rosaria, Cristina Della Pina, and Mario Pagliaro. 2025. “Italy’s Excellence in Research.” Heliyon 11 (1): e41335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41335.

Clemons, Mark, M. De Costa E Silva, Miguel, A.A. Joy, Anil Abraham, Cobey Kelly D., Mazzarello Sasha, Stober Carol, Hutton Brian. 2017. “Predatory Invitations from Journals: More than Just a Nuisance?.” Oncologist 22 (2): 236–40. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0371.

Cortegiani, Andrea, Manca, Andrea, Lalu, Manoj, and Moher, David. 2020. “Inclusion of Predatory Journals in Scopus Is Inflating Scholars’ Metrics and Advancing Careers.” International Journal of Public Health 65 (1): 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01318-w.

Cortegiani, Andrea, Filippo Sanfilippo, Jacopo Tramarin, and Antonino Giarratano. 2019. “Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Critical Care Medicine.” Journal of Critical Care 50: 247–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.016.

Cortegiani, A., A. Manca, and A. Giarratano. 2020. ‘Predatory Journals and Conferences: Why Fake Counts’. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 33 (2): 2. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000829.

De Fiore, Luca. 2024. Sul Pubblicare in Medicina: Impact Factor, Open Access, Peer Review, Predatory Journal e Altre Creature Misteriose. Roma: Il pensiero scientifico.

Duc, Nguyen Minh, Hiep, Dang Vinh, Thong, Pham Minh, Zunic Lejla, Zildzic Muharem, Donev Doncho, Jankovic Slobodan M., Hozo Izet, Masic Izet. 2020. “Predatory Open Access Journals Are Indexed in Reputable Databases: A Revisiting Issue or an Unsolved Problem.” Medical Archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) 74 (4): 318–22. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2020.74.318-322.

Frank, John, Foster, Rosemary and Pagliari, Claudia. 2023. “Open Access Publishing – Noble Intention, Flawed Reality.” Social Science and Medicine 317 (115592). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115592.

Grudniewicz, Agnes, Moher, David, Cobey, Kelly D., Bryson, Gregory L., Cukier Samantha, Allen, Kristiann, Ardern, Clare, Balcom Lesley, Barros Tiago, Berger Monica, Ciro Jairo Buitrago, Cugusi Lucia, Donaldson Michael R., Egger Matthias, Graham Ian D., Hodgkinson Matt, Khan Karim M., Mabizela Mahlubi, Manca Andrea, Milzow Katrin, Mouton Johann, Muchenje, Marvelous, Olijhoek Tom, Ommaya Alexander, Patwardhan, Bhushan, Poff Deborah, Proulx, Laurie, Rodger Marc, Severin Anna, Strinzel Michaela, Sylos-Labini Mauro, Tamblyn Robyn, Niekerk Marthie van, Wicherts Jelte M., and Lalu Manoj M. 2019. “Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence.” Nature 576 (7786): 7786. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y.

Happe, Laura E. 2020. “Distinguishing Predatory from Reputable Publishing Practices.” In Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, 26 (8). https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.956

Kirilova, Savina. 2021. ‘Hijacked Journals - How Dangerous They Can Be?’ Academia Letters, ahead of print, July 15. https://doi.org/10.20935/al2081.

Koerber, Amy, Starkey, Jesse C., Ardon-Dryer, Karin, Cummins, R. Glenn, Eko, Lyombe, and Kee, Kerk Fong. 2020. “A Qualitative Content Analysis of Watchlists vs Safelists: How Do They Address the Issue of Predatory Publishing?.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 46 (6): 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102236.

Kratochvíl, Jiří, Plch, Lukáš, Sebera, Martin and Koriťáková, Eva. 2020. “Evaluation of Untrustworthy Journals: Transition from Formal Criteria to a Complex View.” Learned Publishing 33 (3): 308–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1299.

Krawczyk, Franciszek, and Kulczycki, Emanuel. 2021. “How Is Open Access Accused of Being Predatory? The Impact of Beall ? S Lists of Predatory Journals on Academic Publishing.” JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP 47 (2): 2. WOS:000632489100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102271.

Krawczyk, Franciszek, and Kulczycki, Emanuel. 2021. “On the Geopolitics of Academic Publishing: The Mislocated Centers of Scholarly Communication.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 1984641. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1984641.

Kumar, Akhilesh, Ravi Gupta, Krishna Kant Tripathi, and Rajani Ranjan Singh. 2022. “Predatory Publications in the Era of the Internet and Technology: Open Access Publications Are at Risk.” ATHENS JOURNAL OF MASS MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS 8 (2): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.8-2-1.

Kurambayev, Bahtiyar, and Freedman, Eric. 2021. “Publish or Perish? The Steep, Steep Path for Central Asia Journalism and Mass Communication Faculty.” Journalism and Mass Communication Educator 76 (2): 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695820947259.

Linacre, Simon. 2022. Predator Effect: Understanding the Past, Present and Future of Deceptive Academic Journals. Maize Books. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12739277.

Mabou Tagne, Alex, Cassina Niccolò, Furgiuele Alessia, Storelli Elisa, Cosentino Marco, and Marino Franca. 2020. “Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: A Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy.” Journal of Academic Ethics 18 (2): 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09359-0.

Maccarini Silvia, Nuria Bautista-Puig, and Eva Méndez. 2026. “Predatory Publishing in Academic Scientific Publications. Awareness among Research Communities in Italy”. Zenodo, March 28. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.19286209.

Manca Andrea, Martinez Gianluca, Cugusi Lucia, Dragone Daniele, Dvir Zeevi and Deriu Franca. 2017. “The Surge of Predatory Open-Access in Neurosciences and Neurology.” Neuroscience 353: 166–73. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.04.014.

Manca Andrea, Cugusi Lucia, Dragone Daniele, and Deriu Franca. 2016. “Predatory Journals: Prevention Better than Cure?.” Journal of the Neurological Sciences 370 (November): 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2016.09.052.

Manley, Stewart. 2019. “Predatory Journals on Trial: Allegations, Responses, And Lessons For Scholarly Publishing From FTC v. OMICS.” Journal Of Scholarly Publishing 50 (3): 183–200. Wos:000464577600002. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.50.3.02.

Martinino Alessandro, Gabriele Campagnoli, Sofia Dallavalle, Allison Soto, Sjaak Pouwels, and Frank Smeenk. 2024. “Investigating Country-Specific Perceptions of Predatory Journals and Their Impact on Scholarly Integrity. A Systematic Review”. Cureus, 16(7): e64674. http://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64674.

Maurer, Elke, Nike Walter, Tina Histing, et al. 2021. ‘Awareness of Predatory Journals and Open Access Publishing among Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeons – Results from an Online Survey in Germany’. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 22 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04223-7.

Moncada, Manuela. 2025. ‘Recognizing Predatory Journals.; Riconoscere Le Riviste Predatorie’. In Recenti Progressi in Medicina, vol. 116. no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1701/4450.44439.

Morriello, Rossana. 2022. Dalla pirateria dei libri all’editoria predatoria: un percorso tra storia della stampa ed etica della comunicazione scientifica. Prima edizione. Ledizioni.

Nicholas, David, Eti Herman, Abdullah Abrizah, et al. 2023. ‘Never Mind Predatory Publishers… What about “Grey” Publishers?’ El Profesional de La Información, September 9, e320509. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.09.

Pasqui, Valdo. 2021. ‘Biblioteche Digitali e Trasformazione Digitale Della PA’. DigItalia 16 (1): 9–37. https://doi.org/10.36181/digitalia-00024.

Pearson, Geraldine S. 2016. “Open Access and Predatory Journals: Two Very Different Entities.” Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 22 6: 447–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390316668478.

Poltronieri Elisabetta, Truccolo Ivana, Di Benedetto Corrado, Castelli Mauro, Mazzocut Mauro, and Cognetti, Gaetana. 2010. “Science, Institutional Archives and Open Access: An Overview and a Pilot Survey on the Italian Cancer Research Institutions.” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research 29 (1): 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-168.

Richtig, Georg, Berger, Marina, Lange-Asschenfeldt, Bernhard Friedrich Gustav, Aberer, Werner, and Richtig, Erika. 2018. “Problems and Challenges of Predatory Journals.” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 32 (9): 1441–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15039.

Salehi, Mohammad, Mohammad Soltani, Hadis Tamleh, and Shohreh Teimournezhad. 2020. “Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: Authors’ Perspectives.” Learned Publishing 33 (2): 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1261.

Shah, Waqar Ali, Ali Rukhsana, and Lashari, Asadullah. 2022. “De-Naturalizing the “Predatory”: A Study of “Bogus” Publications at Public Sector Universities in Pakistan.” Accountability in Research 31 (2):80–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2106424.

Shamseer, Larissa, David Moher, Onyi Maduekwe, Lucy Turner, Virginia Barbour, Rebecca Burch, Jocalyn Clark, James Galipeau, Jason Roberts, Beverley J. Shea. 2017. “Potential Predatory and Legitimate Biomedical Journals: Can You Tell the Difference? A Cross-Sectional Comparison.” BMC Medicine 15 (1): 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9.

Shen, Cenyu, and Bo Christer Björk. 2015. “Predatory” Open Access: A Longitudinal Study of Article Volumes and Market Characteristics.” BMC Medicine 13, 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.

Shen, Cenyu, and Leena Shah. 2023. “Predatory Publishing Practices: What Researchers Should Know before Submitting Their Manuscript.” Insights the UKSG Journal 36 (October): 19. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.631.

Siler, Kyle, Philippe Vincent-Lamarre, Cassidy R. Sugimoto, and Vincent Larivière. 2021. “Predatory Publishers’ Latest Scam: Bootlegged and Rebranded Papers.” Nature 598 (7882): 563–65. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02906-8.

Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A., and Aceil Al-Khatib. 2021. “Copyright Transfer in Group-Authored Scientific Publications.” INSIGHTS-THE UKSG JOURNAL 34 (April). https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.535.

Xia, Jingfeng. 2021. Predatory Publishing. 1st edn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003029335.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS