Initiating the learning process: A model for federated searching and information literacy

3883 2 174 1 372 document 174 Postprint_IRSQ_Labelle.pdf application/pdf edf6548d87d0412c64e2c84b59d1b800 MD5 168144 2012-12-14 17:40:20 https://eprints.rclis.org/3883/1/Postprint_IRSQ_Labelle.pdf 3883 1 1 application/pdf en public

Postprint_IRSQ_Labelle.pdf

198447 2 205008 document 198447 lightbox.jpg image/png 6cc063b2447038b21f8dc2d5cf19423b MD5 63419 2012-12-21 16:40:17 https://eprints.rclis.org/3883/3/lightbox.jpg 3883 3 3 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from application/pdf to thumbnail_lightbox en public

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/174 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/174 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/174 archive 4137 disk0/00/00/38/83 2009-12-15 2014-10-02 11:56:39 2012-12-14 17:40:20 journalp show Labelle Patrick R. Initiating the learning process: A model for federated searching and information literacy pub CD HL information literacy federated searching information seeking behavior native interface searching instruction teaching learning instructional design Access to federated search tools is increasing and many academic libraries are now looking beyond implementation, and are considering the broader implications of federated searching such as its impact on information literacy programs. Although this emerging technology is still experiencing acknowledged growing pains, its potential for transforming the way students conduct research is promising. Reviewing information seeking behavior research and analyzing how federated searching fits within the Association of College and Research Libraries’ Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000) enables academic librarians to consider an integrative instructional model that utilizes federated searching as a way of initiating the learning process. 2007 The Haworth Information Press en FALSE CA- http://hdl.handle.net/10760/3883 public Internet Reference Services Quarterly 12 3/4 237-252 TRUE Arant, Wendi, and Leila Payne. 2001. The common user interface in academic libraries: Myth or reality? Library Hi Tech 19 (1): 63-76. Association of College and Research Libraries. 2000. Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago, IL: American Library Association. Also available online at http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm Baer, William. 2004. Federated searching: Friend or foe? College & Research Libraries News 65 (9): 518-519. Cox, Christopher. 2006. An analysis of the impact of federated search products on library instruction using the ACRL Standards. portal: Libraries and the Academy 6 (3): 253-267. Crawford, Walt. 2004. Meta, federated, distributed: Search solutions. American Libraries 35 (7): 80. Feeney, Mary, and Jill Newby. 2005. Model for presenting resources in Scholar's Portal. portal: Libraries and the Academy 5 (2): 195-211. Frost, William J. 2004. Do we want or need metasearching? Library Journal, April 1, 68. Fryer, Donna. 2004. Federated search engines. Online 28 (2): 16-19. Hane, Paula J. 2003. The truth about federated searching. Information Today 20 (2): 24. Heinström, Jannica. 2005. Fast surfing, broad scanning and deep diving: The influence of personality and study approach on students' information-seeking behavior. Journal of Documentation 61 (2): 228-247. doi: 10.1108/00220410510585205. Kuhlthau, Carol Collier. 2004. Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. 2nd ed. Westport CT: Libraries Unlimited. Leckie, Gloria J. 1996. Desperately seeking citations: Uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. Journal of Academic Librarianship 22 (6): 201-208. doi: 10.1016/S0099-133(96)90059-2. Luther, Judy. 2003. Trumping Google: Metasearching's promise. Library Journal, October 1, 36-39. McCaskie, Lucy. 2004. What are the implications for information literacy training in higher education with the introduction of federated search tools? MA thesis, University of Sheffield. Also available online at http://dagda.shef.ac.uk/dissertations/2003-04/External/McCaskie_Lucy_MALib.pdf Miller, Todd. 2004. Federated searching: Put it in its place. Library Journal, April 15, 32. Repman, Judi, and Randal D. Carlson. 1999. Surviving the storm: Using metasearch engines effectively. Computers in Libraries 19 (5): 50-55. Sadeh, Tamar. 2004. The challenge of metasearching. New Library World 105 (3/4): 104-112. doi: 10.1108/03074800410526721. Tallent, Ed. 2004. Metasearching in Boston College Libraries - a case study of user reactions. New Library World 105 (1/2): 69-75. doi: 10.1108/03074800410515282. Terrell, John. 2004. Cross database searching: Information literacy for the 'real world'? Paper presented at the Lifelong Learning Conference, Yeppoon, Australia. Also available online at http://lifelonglearning.cqu.edu.au/2004/papers/terrell-133-paper.pdf Webster, Peter. 2004a. Breaking down information silos: Integrating online information. Online 28 (6): 30-34. ———. 2004b. Metasearching in an academic environment. Online 28 (2): 20-23. Weiler, Angela. 2005. Information-seeking behavior in generation Y students: Motivation, critical thinking, and learning theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31 (1): 46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2004.09.009. Zimmerman, Devin. 2004. Metasearching's teaching moments. Library Journal, September 1, 54. info:eu-repo/semantics/other