[1] Functional requirements for bibliographic record: final report. München: Saur, 1998. <http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr.pdf>. Trad. it., Requisiti funzionali per record bibliografici. Roma: ICCU, 2000. 

[2] Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records. Frankfurt-am-Main: IFLA UBCIM, 1998. <http://www.ifla.org/VI/3/p1996-2/mlar.htm>. 

[3] International Conference on National Bibliographic Services. <http://www.ifla.org/VI/3/icnbs/fina.htm>. 

[4] ISTC. <http://www.nlc-bnc.ca/iso/tc46sc9/wg3.htm>.
 
[5] INDECS. <http://www.indecs.org>. 

[6] <indecs>: Summary final report, August 2002. <http://www.indecs.org/pdf/SummaryReport.pdf>. 
[7] INTERPARTY. <http://www.interparty.org/>. 

[8] MALVINE. <http://www.malvine.org>.
 
[9] LEAF. <http://www.leaf-eu.org>.
 
[10] DELOS. <http://www.delos-nsf.actorswg.cdlib.org/>.
 
[11] Dublin core. <http://dublincore.org/groups/agents/>.
 
[12] HKCAN. <http://hkcan.ln.edu.hk/>.
 
[13] HKUST. <http://library.ust.hk/info/reports/xmlnac.html>.
 
[14] MACS. <http://infolab.kub.nl/prj/macs/>.
 
[15] METAPERS. <http://deposit.ddb.de/meta_pers.htm>.
 
[16] VIAF. <http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/viaf/index.shtm>.
 
[17] Françoise Bourdon. Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR): to what extent authority control can be supported by technical means? In: 67th IFLA General Conference and Council, August 16th-25th, 2001, Boston, USA [on line]. The Hague: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 2001. <http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla67/papers/096-152ae.pdf>.