RoMEO Studies 3: How academics expect to use open-access research papers

4845 2 1539 1 4582 document 1539 RoMEO Studies 3.pdf application/pdf 78d9dba6ef154cefed41e3fa7037b7d1 MD5 230656 2012-12-14 18:02:15 https://eprints.rclis.org/4845/1/RoMEO%20Studies%203.pdf 4845 1 1 application/pdf en public

RoMEO Studies 3.pdf

202571 2 209132 document 202571 lightbox.jpg image/png 64ef473a984cf71acca54d4cf571af1e MD5 84453 2012-12-21 17:16:12 https://eprints.rclis.org/4845/7/lightbox.jpg 4845 7 7 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from application/pdf to thumbnail_lightbox en public

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/1539 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/1539 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/1539 archive 46 disk0/00/00/48/45 2004-05-27 2014-10-02 11:58:35 2012-12-14 18:02:15 preprint show Gadd Elizabeth Oppenheim Charles Probets Steve RoMEO Studies 3: How academics expect to use open-access research papers pub E. Romeo Project, copyright, Open archive This paper is the third in a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open-archiving). It considers previous studies of the usage of electronic journal articles through a literature survey. It then reports on the results of a survey of 542 academic authors as to how they expected to use open-access research papers. This data is compared with results from the second of the RoMEO Studies series as to how academics wished to protect their open-access research papers. The ways in which academics expect to use open-access works (including activities, restrictions and conditions) are described. It concludes that academics-as-users do not expect to perform all the activities with open-access research papers that academics-as-authors would allow. Thus the rights metadata proposed by the RoMEO Project would appear to meet the usage requirements of most academics. 2003 en FALSE GB- http://hdl.handle.net/10760/4845 public FALSE Brown, C. M. (1999). "Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists." Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(10): 929-43. Carr, L., Steve Hitchcock, Wendy Hall and Stevan Harnad (2000). A usage-based analysis of CoRR: a commentary on "CoRR: a Computing Research Repository" by Joseph Y. Halpern. [Self-archived] URL:http://cogprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/archive/00001645/00/harnad00.halpern.htm. Cowhig, J. (2001). "Electronic article and journal usage statistics (EAJUS): proposal for an industry-wide standard." Learned Publishing 14(3): 233-236. Eason, K., Sue Richardson, and Liangzhi Yu (2000). "Patterns of use of electronic journals." Journal of Documentation 56(5): 477-504. Eason, K., and Susan Harker (2000). "Psychological processes in the use of electronic journals." Serials 13(2): 67-72. Gadd, E., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets (2003a). "RoMEO Studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving." Journal of Documentation 59(3): 243-277. Gadd, E., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets (2003b). "RoMEO Studies 2: How academics want to protect their open-access research papers." Journal of Information Science 29(5): [In Press]. Great Britain, 1988. Copyright, designs and patents Act 1988, Elizabeth II. London : HMSO Gutwirth, S. (2002). Privacy and the information age. Lanham, Md; Oxford, Rowman & Littlefield. Harnad, S. (2001). "For Whom the Gate Tolls? How and Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution Self-Archiving, Now." http://cogprints.soton.ac.uk/documents/disk0/00/00/16/39/index.html. Hunt, C. (2002). Archive User Survey. Electronics and Computer Science Department. Southampton, Southampton University. URL: http://www.eprints.org/results/. ICOLC (2001). Guidelines for statistical measures of usage of web-based indexed, abstracted and full-text resources. URL: http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/2001webstats.htm Kidd, T. (2002). "Electronic journal usage statistics in practice." Serials 15(1): 11-17. Lessig, L. (2002). "Free Culture. [Keynote paper presented at the Open Source Convention. 22-26 July, 2002. San Diego, CA]." http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/policy/2002/08/15/lessig.html. Luther, J. (2000). White Paper on Electronic Journal Usage Statistics. Washington, DC., Council on Library and Information Resources. URL: http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub94/contents.html. Meek, J. (2002). Nobel prize for British and US scientists who used worms to decode the book of life. The Guardian. London. URL: http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4517292,00.html. Nicholas, D., and P. Huntington. (2002). Big deals: results and analysis from a pilot analysis of web log data. London: Ciber. Open Digital Rights Language. (2002) URL: http://odrl.net/ Olsen, J. (1994). Electronic journal literature: implications for scholars. London, Mecklermedia. Pinfield, S. (2001). "How Do Physicists Use an E-Print Archive? Implications for Institutional E-Print Services." D-Lib Magazine 7(12). URL: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html. Project COUNTER (2003). URL: http://www.projectcounter.org/ Richardson, R. J. (1981). "End-user online searching in a high-technology environment." Online 5(4): 44-57. Schauder, D. (1994). "Electronic publishing of professional articles: attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communications industry." Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(2): 73-100. Shackel, B. (1991). BLEND-9: overview and appraisal. British Library Research Paper 82. London, British Library Research and Development Department. Simpson, A. (1988). "Academic journal usage." British Journal of Academic Librarianship 3(1): 25-36. Sturges, P. (2002). Privacy in the digital library environment. Boston Spa, Resource. SuperJournal Project. (1999) URL: http://www.mimas.ac.uk/sj/ Swan, A. (2002). Authors and electronic publishing: the ALPSP research study on authors' and readers' views of electronic research communication. West Sussex, ALPSP: 83pp. Tenopir, C., and Donald W. King (2000). Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians and publishers. Washington, Special Libraries Association. Tenopir, C., and Donald W. King (2001). Electronic journals: how user behaviour is changing. Online Information, London, Online Information. URL: http://www.online-information.co.uk/proceedings/online/2001/tenopir_c.asp. Tenopir, C., and Donald W. King (2002). "Reading behaviour and electronic journals." Learned Publishing 15(4): 259-265. Torii: (2003) Access to the digital research community. URL: http://tips.sissa.it/docs/booklet.pdf Tuck, B., et al. (1990). Project Quartet. Library and Information Research Report 76. London, The British Library. Virtual Research Environment Project. 2003. URL:http://www.external.ull.ac.uk/elpt/VRE_Project/index.asp Woodward, H., McKnight, C; Pritchett, C; Rowland, F (1997). Cafe Jus: commercial and free electronic journals user study. London, British Library. Research and Innovation Report: 1-52. Yu, L., and Ann Apps (2000). "Studying E-Journal User Behavior Using Log Files: The Experience of SuperJournal." Library & Information Science Research 22(3): 311-338. info:eu-repo/semantics/other