RoMEO Studies 5: IPR issues for OAI Data and Service Providers

4847 2 1541 1 4590 document 1541 Romeo Studies 5.pdf application/pdf 8d5325ae155484d696be9d11eb60d52f MD5 241568 2012-12-14 18:02:17 https://eprints.rclis.org/4847/1/Romeo%20Studies%205.pdf 4847 1 1 application/pdf en public

Romeo Studies 5.pdf

202579 2 209140 document 202579 lightbox.jpg image/png fb1717da1979d279c7bc5a9d7c2576c5 MD5 95518 2012-12-21 17:16:16 https://eprints.rclis.org/4847/7/lightbox.jpg 4847 7 7 image/png other Thumbnails conversion from application/pdf to thumbnail_lightbox en public

lightbox.jpg

preview.jpg

medium.jpg

small.jpg

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/1541 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/1541 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://eprints.rclis.org/id/document/1541 archive 46 disk0/00/00/48/47 2004-05-27 2014-10-02 11:58:35 2012-12-14 18:02:17 preprint show Gadd Elizabeth Oppenheim Charles Probets Steve RoMEO Studies 5: IPR issues for OAI Data and Service Providers pub E. Romeo Project, copyright, Open archive This paper is the fifth in a series of studies emanating from the UK JISC-funded RoMEO Project (Rights Metadata for Open-archiving). It reports the results of two surveys of OAI Data Providers (DPs) and Service Providers (SPs) with regards to the rights issues they face. It finds that very few DPs have rights agreements with depositing authors and that there is no standard approach to the creation of rights metadata. The paper considers the rights protection afforded individual and collections of metadata records under UK Law and contrasts this with DP and SP’s views on the rights status of metadata and how they wish to protect it. The majority of DP and SPs believe that a standard way of describing both the rights status of documents and of metadata would be useful 2003 en FALSE GB- http://hdl.handle.net/10760/4847 public FALSE Bass, M., et al (2002). DSpace: a sustainable solution for institution digital asset services: spanning the information asset value chain: ingest, manage, preserve, disseminate: internal reference specification: functionality. Cambridge MA, Hewlett Packard Company: 10. URL: http://dspace.org/technology/functionality.pdf Bird, S. (2001). White paper on machine-readable rights information. Pennsylvania, University of Pennsylvania: http://www.ldc.upenn.edu/sb/oai/rights.html. Caltech Library System. (2001) Author permission agreement URL: http://caltechlib.library.caltech.edu/archive/00000006/ Crow, R. (2002). SPARC Institutional Repository Checklist & Resource Guide. Washington, SPARC: http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/IR_Guide.html. DSpace. (2002). Non-Exclusive Distribution License URL: http://dspace.org/mit/policies/license.html Dublin Core Metadata Initiative. (2003). URL: http://dublincore.org/ Eprints.org (2003) URL: http://www.eprints.org/ The FAIR Programme. (2002) URL: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=programme_fair Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets. (2003a) RoMEO Studies 2: How academics want to protect their open-access research papers. Journal of Information Science, [In Press]. Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets. (2003b) RoMEO Studies 3: How academics expect to use open-access research papers. Submitted to Journal of Library and Information Science. Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets. (2003c) RoMEO Studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation. 59(3), 243-277 Gadd, Elizabeth., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets. (2003d) RoMEO Studies 4: The author-publisher bargain: an analysis of Journal Publishers Copyright Transfer Agreements. To be submitted to Learned Publishing. Gadd, E., Charles Oppenheim and Steve Probets (2003e). "RoMEO Studies 6: Rights metadata for Open Archiving - the RoMEO Solutions." To be submitted to Program. Giavarra, Emmanuella, and Charles Oppenheim. (1997) EU Database Directive: some clarifications. SCONUL Newsletter 12, 6-7. Hunt, C. (2002). Archive User Survey. Electronics and Computer Science Department. Southampton, Southampton University: http://www.eprints.org/results/. Liu, X., Kurt Maly and Mohammad Zubair (2001). "Arc - an OAI service provider for digital library federation." D-Lib Magazine 7(4): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april01/liu/04liu.html. McClelland, M., D. McArthur, et al. (2002). Challenges for service providers when importing metadata in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine 8 (4) Apr 2002. URL: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/mcclelland /04mcclelland.html. Nixon, W. (2002). "The evolution of an institutional e-prints archive at the University of Glasgow." Ariadne 32 URL: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue32/eprint-archives/ Nixon, W. (2003). "DAEDALUS: Freeing Scholarly Communication at the University of Glasgow." Ariadne 34 URL: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk /issue34/nixon/intro.html Open Archives initiative. (2003a) URL: http://www.openarchives.org/ Open Archives initiative. (2003b) Registered Data Providers URL: http://www.openarchives.org/Register/BrowseSites.pl Open Language Archives Community (2003). URL: http://www.language-archives.org/ Oppenheim, Charles, Heather Rosenblatt, Raymond Wall (Eds). (2001) The Aslib guide to copyright. London : Aslib Information Management. Pinfield, S. (2001). "How Do Physicists Use an E-Print Archive? Implications for Institutional E-Print Services." D-Lib Magazine 7(12): http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december01/pinfield/12pinfield.html. Pinfield, S., and John McColl (2002). "Climbing the scholarly publication mountain with SHERPA." Ariadne 33 URL: http://ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/sherpa. Project RoMEO. (2003a). OAI Data Provider Survey URL: http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~lbeag/Data-provider-questionnaire.htm Project RoMEO. (2003b). OAI Service Provider Survey URL: http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/~lbeag/Service-provider-questionnaire.htm info:eu-repo/semantics/other