<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<referencetext xmlns="http://eprints.org/ep2/data/2.0">Van Raan AFJ, ed. Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988 
Egghe L Rousseau R. Introduction to infometrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990. 
Wallace D P. A solution in search of a problem: bibliometrics &amp; libraries. Libr J 1987; (112): 43-7. 
Rousseau R. A scientometric study of the scientific publications of LUC Period 1981-1993: report [Flanders], 1995. 
De Bruin R Kint A Luwel M. A study of research evaluation and planning: the University of Ghent Res Evaluat, 1993; (3):35 -41. 
De Bruin R, Moed H F, Spruyt E. Antwerpse analyses. Antwerpen: CWTS. Leiden en UIA, 1993. 
Moed H F, Burger W J M, Frankfort J G. The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Res Policy 1985;(4):131-49. 
Oppenheim C. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university departments. 
J Document 1995; (51):18-27. 
Abelson P. Mechanisms for evaluating scientific information and the role of peer review J Am Soci Inform Sci 1990; (41):216-22. 
Wallmark JT, Sedig K G. Quality of research measured by citation method and by peer review a comparison. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 1986; (33):218-22. 
Garfield E. How to use citation analysis for faculty evaluations and when isit relevant. Part I Curr Contents 1983;(44): 
Arunachalam S. Science in the European Community the extent of collaboration. Curr Sci 1992; (63):56-8. 
Rousseau R. Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. En: Egghe L, Rousseau R, eds. Informetrics 87/88 249-62. 
Van Hooydonk G, Gevaert R, Milisproost G. A bibliotheconomic analysis of the impact factores of scientific disciplines. Scientometrics 1994; (30):65-81. 
Rousseau R. Evolution d? importantes revues pharmacologiques. Rev Fr Bibliométrie, n. 5, p. 102-17, 1989. 
Rousseau R, Spinak, E. Do a field list of internationally visible journals and their journal impact factors depend on the initial set of journals? A research proposal. J Document 1996; (52):449-56. 
Cole S, Cole J R. Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science. Am Sociol Rev 1967; (32):377-90. 
Collins MP, Berge ZL. IPCT Journal: a case study of an electronic journal on the internet J Am Soci Inform Sci 1994; (45):771-6. 
Norman M, Stoker B. Data envelopment analysis: the assessment of performance. Chicester: Wiley 1991. 
Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Operat Res 1978; 2(6):429-44. 
Arcelus F J, Coleman D F. An efficiency review of university departments. Int J Syst Sci 1997; 28(7):721-9. 
Beasley J E. Determining teaching and research efficiencies. J Operat Res Soc n. 46. p 1995; (45):441-52. 
Degraeve Z, Lambrechts M, Van Puymbroeck V. E en vergelijkende prestatiestudie van de departementen van de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Tijdsch Econ Manag 1996; (41):165-93. 
Pedraja-Chaparro F, Salinas Jimenez J, Smith P On the rle of weight restictions in data envelopment analysis. J Product Anal 1997; (8):215-30. 
Johnes G, Johnes J. Apples and oranges: the aggregation problem in publications analysis Scientometrics 1992; (25):353-65. 
Rousseau S, Rousseau R. Data envelopment analysis as a tool for constructin scientometric indicators. Scientometrics 1997; (40):45-56. 
___ Measuring the scientific wealth of European nations: taking effectiveness into account Scientometrics 1998; (42):75-87.</referencetext>
