Arquero Avilés, R. (2002). “Estudios cualitativos sobre análisis y evaluación de la investigación en biblioteconomía y documentación: revisión bibliográfica.” Investigación Bibliotecológica, [En línea], 16, (32). http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/iibiblio/vol16-32/IBI03202.pdf .[Accesada 15 noviembre 2003].

Beal, C. (1985). Community Profiling for Librarians. Sheffield: Centre for Research on User Studies.

Black, A. y Crann, M. (2000) A Mass Observation of the Public Library. London: The Library and Information Commission.

Carlin, A. P. (2003). “Disciplinary debates and bases of interdisciplinary studies: The place of research ethics in library and information science.” Library and Information Science Research. 25, 3-18.

Córdoba, S. (1998). “los métodos cualitativos en los estudios de usuarios: una revisión bibliográfica.” Forinfo. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Usuarios de Información. [En línea], 1, (1). http://rayuela.uc3m.es/~elias/forinf02/docs/info-1.doc . [Accesada 15 noviembre 2003].

Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2001). “¿Por qué enseñar métodos de investigación en las facultades de biblioteconomía y documentación?” Anales de Documentación. 4, (4). http://www.um.es/fccd/anales/ad04/a03metinv.pdf . [Accesada 15 noviembre 2003].

Denscombe, M. (2003). The Good Research Guide. For Small-scale Social Research Projects. 2da. ed. Maidenhead, Gran Bretaña: Open University Press. 

Engels, F. (1969). The Condition of the Working Class in England : From Personal Observation and Authentic Sources. St. Albans, UK: Granada. 

Feynman, R.P. (2001). The Pleasure of Finding Things Out. London: Penguin Books.

Fidel, R. (1993). “Qualitative methods in information retrieval research.” Library and Information Science Research, 15, 219-247 cited in: Powell, R. R. (1999). “Recent trends in research: a methodological essay.” Library and Information Science Research, 21, (1), 91-119.

Galicia Sánchez, S. (1985). Introducción al Estudio del Conocimiento Científico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, México: Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa.

Glitz, B. (1998) Focus Groups for Libraries and Librarians. New York: Forbes. Cited in: Glitz, B., Hamásu, C. & Sandstrom, H. (2001). “The focus group: a tool for programme planning, assessment and decision –making –an American view.” Health Information and Libraries Journal, 18, 30-37. 

Glitz, B., Hamásu, C. & Sandstrom, H. (2001). “The focus group: a tool for programme planning, assessment and decision –making –an American view.” Health Information and Libraries Journal, 18, 30-37. 

Gorman, G.E. & Clayton, P. (1997). Qualitative Research for the Information Professional: A Práctical Handbook. London: Library Association Publishing.

Humberman, A. M. & Miles, M. B. (2002). The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Kim, M. T. (1996). “Research Record.” Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 37, 376-383, cited in: Powell, R. R. (1999). “Recent trends in research: a methodological essay.” Library and Information Science Research, 21, (1), 91-119.

Licea de Arenas, J. y Arenas Vargas, M. (2000). “La formación de comunidades científicas en bibliotecología y ciencia de la información.” Anales de Documentación. 3, 81-91. http://www.um.es/fccd/anales/ad03/AD06-2000.PDF . [Accesada 15 noviembre 2003].

Linley, R. and Usherwood, B. (1998). New Measures for the New Library: A Social Audit of Public Libraries. Sheffield, UK: Centre for the Public Library in the Information Society, Department of Information Studies, The University of Sheffield. [British Library Research and Innovation Centre Report 89]. [En línea] http://cplis.shef.ac.uk/newmeasures.pdf . [Accesado 15 Noviembre 2003]. 

Mellon, C. A. (1990). Naturalistic Inquiry for Library Science: Methods and Applications for Research, Evaluation, and Teaching. New York: Greenwood Press.

Orwell, G. (1962). The road to Wigan Pier. Harmondsworth : Penguin / Secker and Warburg.

Phillips, E. M. & Pugh, D.S. (2000). How to Get a PhD. A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors. 3rd. ed. Buckingham; Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Powell, R. R. (1999). “Recent trends in research: a methodological essay.” Library and Information Science Research, 21, (1), 91-119.

Sagan, C. & Druyan, A. (1992). Shadows of our Forgotten Ancestors. A Search for Who We Are. London: BCA.

Sarling, J. H. & Van Tassel, D.S. (1999). “Community analysis: research that matters to a a North-Central Dever community.” Library and Information Science Research. 21 (1), 7-29.

Schofield, J. W. (2002). “Increasing the generality of qualitative research.” In: Humberman, A. M. & Miles, M. B. (2002). The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Silverman, D. (2000) Doing Qualitative Research: A Práctical Handbook. London: Sage Publications.

Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cited in: Correia, Z. & Wilson, T. D. (1997). “Scanning the business environment for information: a grounded theory approach.” Information Research, [En línea], 2, (4). http://informationr.net/ir/4-3/paper59.html .[Accesada 15 noviembre 2003].

Westbrook, L. (1994). “Qualitative research methods: a review of major stages, data analysis techniques, and quality controls.” Library and Information Science Research, 16, 241-254.

Williamson, K., Schauder, D. & Bow, A. Lucas, H. (2000). “ Information seeking by blind and sight impaired citizens: an ecological study.” Information Research, [En línea], 5, (4). http://informationr.net/ir/4-3/paper59.html . [Accesada 15 noviembre 2003].

Wilson, T. (1999). “New fields for research in the 21st Century.” In Klasson, M., Lougridge, B. & Loof, S. (eds). New Fields for Research in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the 3rd British-Nordic Conference on Library and Information Studies. 12-14 April, 1999, Boras, Sweden. pp. 345-352. The Swedish School of Library and Information Studies, University College of Boras, Boras.

Wilson, T. D. (1981). “A case study in qualitative research?” Social Science Information Studies, 1 (1), 241-246.