Lineamientos de alfabetización en inteligencia artificial para profesionales de la información en bibliotecas universitarias a partir de su convergencia con la alfabetización informacional y la alfabetización digital

Castillo-Velásquez, Julián Arturo Lineamientos de alfabetización en inteligencia artificial para profesionales de la información en bibliotecas universitarias a partir de su convergencia con la alfabetización informacional y la alfabetización digital., 2026 UNSPECIFIED thesis, Universidad de La Salle. [Thesis]

This is the latest version of this item.

[thumbnail of 215b7f2c-99a0-4512-99db-293b7e43915e] Text
215b7f2c-99a0-4512-99db-293b7e43915e - Published version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.
Download (429kB)

English abstract

This research proposes artificial intelligence literacy (AIL) guidelines for the development ofinformation professionals’ competencies in academic libraries, based on its convergence withinformation literacy (IL) and digital literacy (DL). The study responds to the absence of astructured framework to guide the critical, ethical, and contextualized adoption of generativeartificial intelligence in the library field. It was developed under the critical-social paradigm, witha mixed-methods approach and a triangulation design. The qualitative component was based on anSLR and content analysis; the quantitative component relied on a survey administered to 92information professionals registered with the National Council of Librarianship. A total of 232operational subcategories were identified, organized into 8 capacities, 50 components, 115 appliedcompetencies, and 59 integrative meta-competencies across seven professional profiles. Likewise,82 factors were identified across the technological, economic, ethical, and social dimensions.Based on this triangulation, 82 AIL guidelines were designed and distributed across the fourdimensions. The study concludes that AIL should not be reduced to the operational mastery oftools, but should instead be constituted as an institutional project aimed at critical training, ethicalgovernance, and the transformative agency of information professionals, in alignment with the realconditions of Colombian academic libraries and their contemporary academic communities.

Spanish abstract

Esta investigación propone lineamientos de Alfabetización en Inteligencia Artificial (ALFIA) parael desarrollo de competencias del profesional de la información en bibliotecas universitarias, apartir de su convergencia con la Alfabetización Informacional (ALFIN) y la Alfabetización Digital(ALDIG). El estudio responde a la ausencia de un marco estructurado que oriente la adopcióncrítica, ética y contextualizada de la inteligencia artificial generativa en el campo bibliotecario. Sedesarrolló bajo el paradigma crítico social, con enfoque mixto y diseño de triangulación. Elcomponente cualitativo se sustentó en una revisión sistemática de literatura y análisis de contenido;el componente cuantitativo se apoyó en una encuesta aplicada a 92 profesionales de la informaciónregistrados ante el Consejo Nacional de Bibliotecología. Se identificaron 232 subcategoríasoperativas, organizadas en 8 capacidades, 50 componentes, 115 competencias aplicadas y 59 meta-competencias integradoras en siete perfiles profesionales. Asimismo, se identificaron 82 factoresen las dimensiones tecnológica, económica, ética y social. A partir de esta triangulación sediseñaron 82 lineamientos de ALFIA distribuidos en las cuatro dimensiones. Se concluye que laALFIA no debe reducirse al dominio operativo de herramientas, sino constituirse como proyectoinstitucional orientado a la formación crítica, la gobernanza ética y la agencia transformadora delprofesional de la información, en coherencia con las condiciones reales de las bibliotecasuniversitarias colombianas y sus comunidades académicas contemporáneas.

Item type: Thesis (UNSPECIFIED)
Keywords: alfabetización en inteligencia artificial (ALFIA), alfabetizacióninformacional (ALFIN), alfabetización digital (ALDIG), bibliotecas universitarias, competenciasprofesionales.
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading. > CE. Literacy.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DD. Academic libraries.
L. Information technology and library technology > LZ. None of these, but in this section.
Depositing user: Sr Julián Castillo
Date deposited: 02 Oct 2026 14:31
Last modified: 02 Oct 2026 14:31
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/49045

Available Versions of this Item

References

Akinyemi, B., & Eunice, O. (2023). Enhancing Academic Library Service Delivery Using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–11. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/8042/

Álvarez Manco, E. (2026). Las capacidades del bibliotecólogo en un mundo cambiante: retos y oportunidades. [Trabajo de grado profesional]. Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

American Library Association. (1989). Information power: Guidelines for school library media programs. American Library Association.

Annapureddy, R., Fornaroli, A., & Gatica-Perez, D. (2024). Generative AI Literacy: Twelve Defining Competencies. Arxiv, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3685680

Arévalo, A. (2024). El papel esencial de las bibliotecas universitarias en la era de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa. Boletín de La Asociación Andaluza de Bibliotecarios, 128, 190–199.

Asemi, A., Ko, A., & Nowkarizi, M. (2021). Intelligent libraries: a review on expert systems, artificial intelligence, and robot. Library Hi Tech, 39(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-02-2020-0038

Asim, M., Arif, M., Rafiq, M., & Ahmad, R. (2023). Investigating applications of Artificial Intelligence in university libraries of Pakistan: An empirical study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102803

Association of College & Research Libraries. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency

Association of College & Research Libraries. (2016). Framework for information literacy for higher education. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework

Association of College & Research Libraries. (2025). AI competencies for academic library workers. American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/acrl/publications

Association of College and Research Libraries. (2016). Marco de Referencia para habilidades para el Manejo de la Información en la Educación Superior. ACRL. https://www.ala.org/sites/default/files/acrl/content/standards/Framework_Spanish.pdf

Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007340

Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries, 55(4), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_55_04_309

Betancur Ríos, L. (2024). Inteligencia artificial en bibliotecas: percepciones y conocimientos de los bibliotecólogos del Sistema de Bibliotecas Públicas de Medellín, entorno al quehacer bibliotecológico [Trabajo de grado profesional]. Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. https://hdl.handle.net/10495/42989

Bisht, R., & Nautiyal, V. (2021). The role of Artificial Intelligence in shaping Library Management and its Utilization. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–15. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-role-of-Artificial-Intelligence-in-shaping-and-Bisht-Nautiyal/bd0e785cfb741be7489996b9864d874eaea185ac

Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Bruce, C. S. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy. Auslib Press.

Camp, N. T., Bengtson, J. A., & Sandstrom, J. C. (2025). The citation catastrophe: Propagation of AI-generated counterfeit citations in scholarship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(4), Artículo 103065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103065

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2003). Becoming Critical: Education Knowledge and Action Research. In Becoming Critical. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203496626

Carretero Gómez, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use (JRC Science for Policy Report). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842

Chigwada, J. (2024). A proposed framework for a digital literacy course for artificial intelligence in academic libraries. South African Journal of Library and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.7553/90-2-2388

Choi, W. C., & Chang, C. I. (2025). ChatGPT-5 in Education: New Capabilities and Opportunities for Teaching and Learning [Preprint]. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202508.0684.v1

Congreso de la República de Colombia. (2025). Proyecto de Ley: Por medio del cual se regula la inteligencia artificial en Colombia para garantizar su desarrollo ético y responsable y se dictan otras disposiciones. Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación y Ministerio TIC.

Contreras, M. R., & Jaimes, J. O. P. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Literacy in Research. 2024 IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence, ColCACI 2024 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ColCACI63187.2024.10666582

Correa Uribe, M., Echeverri Camacho, A., & Zapata Villa, Y. (2025). Uso de la Inteligencia Artificial y la capacidad de pensamiento crítico en estudiantes universitarios de la seccional suroeste de la Universidad de Antioquia [Trabajo de grado profesional]. Universidad de Antioquia, Andes, Colombia. https://hdl.handle.net/10495/48288

Cosgrove, J., & Cachia, R. (2025). DigComp 3.0: European Digital Competence Framework (5th ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/0001149

Cox, A. (2023). How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies literature and the theory of the professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(3), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24635 (Nota: Aunque su publicación oficial en volumen corresponde al año 2023, suele aparecer citado bajo el año 2022 debido a su publicación previa en línea).

Cox, A. M., Pinfield, S., & Rutter, S. (2019). The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech, 37(3), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2018-0105

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Danquah, M. M., Dadzie, P. S., Gyesi, K., Yeboah, F., & Nyarko, C. Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence implementation strategies for Ghanaian academic libraries: A scoping review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(4), Artículo 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102975

Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). (2023). Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2022–2026: Colombia, Potencia Mundial de la Vida (Ley 2294 de 2023). Imprenta Nacional de Colombia.

Departamento Nacional de Planeación (DNP). (2025). Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (CONPES 4144). Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social, República de Colombia.

Diyaolu, B. O., Bakare-Fatungase, O. D., & Ajayi, K. D. (2025). Generative AI ethical conundrum: Librarians as artificial intelligence literacy apostle in the educational space. En Navigating AI in Academic Libraries. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3053-1.ch007

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.

Fals Borda, O. (1987). La investigación-acción participativa: Política y epistemología. Editorial Carlos Valencia.

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (JRC Technical Report EUR 26035 EN). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966

Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogía del oprimido (30.ª ed.). Siglo XXI Editores. (Trabajo original publicado en 1970)

Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2023). Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10997

Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. John Wiley & Sons.

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press. https://www.deeplearningbook.org

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/an-introduction-to-systematic-reviews/book245742

Gutiérrez Barahona, L. J. (2022). Impacto de la Inteligencia Artificial en el rendimiento académico de los estudiantes de la carrera Tecnologías de la Información [Proyecto de titulación]. Universidad Estatal del Sur de Manabí, Jipijapa, Ecuador. http://repositorio.unesum.edu.ec/handle/53000/4589

Gutiérrez Epalza, D. A. (2024). Propuesta e impacto de la inteligencia artificial en el programa de ciencia de la información de la Pontificia Universidad Javeriana [Trabajo de grado]. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, D. C., Colombia. http://hdl.handle.net/10554/68317

Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. In McGRAW-HILL Interamericana Editores S.A. de C.V. http://repositorio.uasb.edu.bo:8080/bitstream/54000/1292/1/Hernández- Metodología de la investigación.pdf

Hernández-Sampieri, R., Fernández-Collado, C., & Baptista-Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6th ed.). Mc Graw Hill.

Horkheimer, M. (2003). Teoría crítica. Amorrortu.

Hossain, Z. (2025). Integrating AI literacy into library and information science education and practice: A human-centered approach. Library Hi Tech News. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-05-2025-0089

Hsieh, C. C., & Hall, W. (1989). Survey of artificial intelligence and expert systems in library and information science literature. Information Technology and Libraries, 8(2), 209–214. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ396927

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2005, noviembre). Faros para la Sociedad de la Información: Declaración de Alejandría sobre la alfabetización informacional y el aprendizaje a lo largo de la vida. IFLA. https://repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/3150

International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). (2020). Advisory Committee on Freedom of Access to Information and Freedom of Expression (FAIFE). IFLA. https://www.ifla.org/units/faife

Jarrahi, M. H., Askay, D., Eshraghi, A., & Smith, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI. Business Horizons, 65(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.02.002

Kautonen, H., & Gasparini, A. A. (2024). B-Wheel – Building AI competences in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(4), 102886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102886

Kisilowska-Szurmińska, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in academic libraries – a tool, a collaborator, an adversary? A Delphi study of university librarians in Poland. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5), Artículo 103114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103114

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kuhlthau, C. C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361–371.

Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services. Ablex Publishing.

Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. Peter Lang.

Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Discover Education, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101

Le Boterf, G. (2001). Ingeniería de las competencias. Gestión 2000.

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

Lo, L. S. (2024a). Evaluating AI Literacy in Academic Libraries: A Survey Study with a Focus on U.S. Employees. College and Research Libraries, 85(5), 635–668. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.85.5.635

Lo, L. S. (2024b). Transforming academic librarianship through AI reskilling: Insights from the GPT-4 exploration program. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102883

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. En Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence: August 31, 1955. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12–14. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v27i4.1904

McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092

Meakin, L. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education Students’ Utilization of Library Resources A Critical Examination. Information Technology and Libraries, 43(3). https://doi.org/10.5860/ital.v43i3.17246

Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. Improving Student Learning, 10, 412–424.

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2024). Guía para el uso de IA generativa en educación e investigación. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000389227

Minsky, M. (1961). Steps toward artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the IRE, 49(1), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1961.287775

Montesi, M., Álvarez Bornstein, B., Bautista Puig, N., Blázquez Ochando, M., & Sánchez Díez, A. (2025). AILIS 1.0: A new framework to measure AI literacy in library and information science (LIS). The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5), Artículo 103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103118

Ndungu, M. W. (2024). Integrating basic artificial intelligence literacy into media and information literacy programs in higher education: A framework for librarians and educators. Journal of Information Literacy, 18(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.11645/18.2.641

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. En Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 280–289. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Odelami, B. (2025, septiembre 9). What the release of ChatGPT‑5 means: A leap forward or a step too soon? Information Matters. https://informationmatters.org/2025/09/what-the-release-of-chatgpt5-means-a-leap-forward-or-a-step-too-soon/

OpenAI. (2022, noviembre 30). Presentamos ChatGPT. OpenAI. https://openai.com/es-419/index/chatgpt

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Perrenoud, P. (1999). Construir competencias desde la escuela. Dolmen.

Peterson, R. (2025). Towards a Pedagogy of Self-Determination: Teaching with Generative AI in the Library Classroom. Georgia Library Quarterly, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.62915/2157-0396.2790

Popper, K. R. (2005). The logic of scientific discovery (Reprint ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203994627

Proyecto Tuning. (2007). Reflexiones y perspectivas de la educación superior en América Latina. Universidad de Deusto.

Ramos, C. A. (2015). Los paradigmas de la investigación científica. Avances En Psicología, 23(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.33539/AVPSICOL.2015.V23N1.167

Ríos Loyo, M. E. (2023). Inteligencia artificial y liderazgo educativo: transformando la planificación y el aprendizaje en la educación superior [Trabajo de grado]. Universidad de las Américas, Quito, Ecuador. http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/15564

Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Schreier, Margrit. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. Sage.

SCONUL Working Group on Information Literacy. (2011). The SCONUL Seven Pillars of Information Literacy: Core model for higher and further education. SCONUL. https://www.sconul.ac.uk/page/seven-pillars-information-literacy

Scott-Branch, J., Laws, R., & Terzi, P. (2023, agosto 30). The intersection of AI, information and digital literacy: Harnessing ChatGPT and other generative tools to enhance teaching and learning. En IFLA WLIC 2023. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA).

SFIA Foundation. (2025). SFIA 9: El marco de referencia. SFIA Foundation. https://sfia-online.org/es/sfia-9

Shahzad, K., & Khan, S. A. (2023). Effects of e-learning technologies on university librarians and libraries: a systematic literature review. In Electronic Library (Vol. 41, Issue 4, pp. 528–554). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2023-0076

Shahzad, K., & Khan, S. A. (2023). Effects of e-learning technologies on university librarians and libraries: A systematic literature review. The Electronic Library, 41(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-04-2023-0076

Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.

Subaveerapandiyan, A., Sunanthini, C., & Amees, M. (2023). A study on the knowledge and perception of artificial intelligence. IFLA Journal, 49(3), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352231180230

Turing, A. M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433

Vrana, R. (2025). Perceptions and use of AI supported tools in higher education libraries in Croatia: An exploratory study. New Review of Academic Librarianship. Publicación anticipada en línea. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2025.2466517

Vuorikari, R., Punie, Y., Carretero Gómez, S., & Van den Brande, G. (2016). DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens (2nd ed., JRC Science for Policy Report). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842

World Bank. (2023, julio 7). Emerging technologies curation series: Generative artificial intelligence. World Bank.

Wu, Y., Lin, Y., Liu, Y., & Yang, Y. (2025). Survey on the current status of AI literacy lectures in China’s university libraries under the AIGC background. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 51(5), Artículo 103111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103111

Yuan, C. W., Tsai, H. yi S., & Chen, Y. T. (2024). Charting Competence: A Holistic Scale for Measuring Proficiency in Artificial Intelligence Literacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241261206 

Zhang, Y., Li, H., Chen, X., & Wu, J. (2025). Application of artificial intelligence in academic libraries: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00295-9

Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The information service environment: Relationships and priorities. National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED100391.pdf


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS