The importance of being "impact factor of Medline" for document delivery service users

San-José-Montano, Blanca and Fernández-Ruiz, María-Carmen The importance of being "impact factor of Medline" for document delivery service users., 2004 . In 9th European Conference of Medical and Health Libraries, Santander (Spain), 20-25 September 2004. [Conference poster]

[img]
Preview
Image (JPEG)
BLANCA%20THE%20IMPORTANCE%2072.jpg

Download (172kB) | Preview

English abstract

INTRODUCTION Due to the rapid increase of the number of journals and electronic resources and their prices, nowadays Collection development has become a very important task in the budget management of the health science libraries. Collection development evaluates the journals using quantitative criteria, such as reading factor (electronically computed indicator used for consultation) and qualitative criteria such as bibliometric and citation analysis indicators. The library of Móstoles Hospital started a Program of the Collection management in the year 2001 , to evaluate the journals collection through qualitative and quantitative analyses, with the collaboration of users. In our library Document Delivery Service is an important tool, in which our users pay to obtain journal articles not present in our collection. OBJECTIVE: To analyse our users´requests to other libraries to determine their necessity for specific journals. The analysis can help collection development in two forms: To know the journals that are most demanded and if the quality indicators that we use are real value. METHODS: We have analysed the title of all the journals required in the last years (2001, 2002 and 2003) with the following indicators: Foreign journals/Spanish journals, citation in secondary literature (MEDLINE, SCI, IME), citation in primary literature (Journal Citation Report), Impact factor. RESULTS: The main results are: 92% of the total number of requested journals are title indexed in the base date MEDLINE, 65% are indexed in the base de date SCI (Science Citation Index, 6% in the base date IME (Indice Medico Español), 92% are foreign journals and the rest are Spanish, 79% of the request are journals with impact factor, which participated in the Journal Citation Report (2002), 48% of these journals have a impact factor in the first quadrant of its ISI subject category. CONCLUSION This information suggests that users generally work with information obtained from journals included in the data base Medline, SCI AND IME, which also are in the Journal Citation Report and have impact factor. This can help us to determine the document supply needs for the biomedical customer, to make decision in the collection management and new acquisition of journals in our library. Besides,we have shown that the quality indicators that are used to evaluate journals are the same that the users consider,therefore confirming: “The importance of being “impact factor or MEDLINE” for a journals".

Item type: Conference poster
Keywords: Collection development, collection analysis, journals, databases, medical libraries, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index, impact factor, analyses, user studies
Subjects: C. Users, literacy and reading. > CA. Use studies.
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CB. User studies.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DI. Science libraries.
F. Management.
F. Management. > FA. Co-operation.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HA. Periodicals, Newspapers.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum. > JJ. Document delivery.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum. > JK. Interlibrary loans.
Depositing user: Blanca San José Montano
Date deposited: 04 Oct 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:08
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10035

References

Frank M. Impact factors: arbiter of excellence. J Med Libr Assoc, 2003; 91(1):4-6. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=12568151 (Consultado 24-09-2003).

Blecic DD, Hollander S, Lanier D. Collection development and outsourcing in academic health sciences libraries: a survey of current practices. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 1999; 87 (2):178-186.

Crawley-Low JV. Collection analysis techniques used to evaluate a graduate-level toxicology collection. J Med Libr Assoc, 2002;90(3):310-316.

Sitting DE. Use of fuzzy set theory to extend Dhawan´s journal selection model: ranking the biomedical informatic serials. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 1999;87(1):43-49.

Darmoni SJ, Roussel F, Benichou J, Thirion B, Pinhas N. Reading factor: a new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries. J Med Libr Assoc, 2002;90 (3):232-327.

Moed HF, Van Leeuwen TN. Impact factors can mislead. Nature, 1996;381:186.

Somnath S, Saint S, Christakis DA. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? J Med Libr Assoc, 2003;91 (1):42-46.

Seglen PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 1997;314(7079):498-502.

Roussel F, Darmon SJ, Thirion B. Cost effectiveness of a medical digital library. Med Inform, 2001;26(4):325-330.

Fernández Ferreras J, Garcia Caballero R, Guzmán Aparicio A, Hernández Calonge I, Prieto Alonso JA. Desarrollo de la colección de publicaciones periódicas en una biblioteca especializada o centro de documentación. Rev Esp Doc Cient, 1994; 17(3): 305-319.

García Martín, A. El Desarrollo de una colección en una biblioteca hospitalaria, tambien en la era digital. Actas de las IX Journadas de información y documentación en ciencias de la salud, Cáceres, 2001.P.211-226.

González Guitian C, Blanco Pérez A. ¿A que revistas suscribirnos? Un método. Actas de la IV Jornadas de Información y Documentación de Ciencias de la Salud 1992, Bilbao. P.41-58.

Alvarado Gómez F, Fernández Luque AM, Bullejos de la Higuera MT et al. Análisis cualitativo y cuantitativo de la colección de publicaciones periódicas en 9 bibliotecas hospitalarias y 1 centro de documentación en ciencias de la salud de Andalucia. Actas IX Jornadas de información y documentación en ciencias de la salud. Cáceres, 2001. P.87-98.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item