Archiving Challenges of Scholarly Electronic Journals: How Do Publishers Manage Them?

Galyani Moghaddam, Golnessa Archiving Challenges of Scholarly Electronic Journals: How Do Publishers Manage Them? Serials Review, 2007, vol. 33, n. 2, pp. 81-90. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of Archiving_Challenges_of_Scholarly_Electronic_Journal_How_do_publishers_manage_them.pdf]
Preview
PDF
Archiving_Challenges_of_Scholarly_Electronic_Journal_How_do_publishers_manage_them.pdf

Download (113kB) | Preview

English abstract

With the growing number of scholarly journals in electronic format, long-term preservation of scholarly electronic journals has become one of the most important issues in digital libraries. Accessibility of scholarly journals on the Internet and electronic publishing in general is causing a shift in the responsibility for archiving journals from libraries to agreements between libraries and publishers. The author focuses on some of the important issues surrounding preservation of digital resources, especially scholarly electronic journals and presents a study on the archiving policies of the following publishers: Elsevier, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Cambridge University Press, Oxford University Press, and IEEE.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Electronic Archiving, Electronic Journals, Publishers, Digital Preservation, E-journal
Subjects: J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum. > JH. Digital preservation.
H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BF. Information policy
Depositing user: Golnessa Galyani Moghaddam
Date deposited: 18 Aug 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:09
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10229

References

1.John Colvin and Judith Keene, “Supporting Undergraduate Learning through the Collaborative Promotion of E-Journals by Library and Academic Departments,” Information Research, 9, no. 2 (January 2004).

2.Golnessa Galyani Moghaddam, “Use of Scholarly Electronic Journals: A Case Study in India,” submitted to Libri: International Journal of Libraries and Information Services (under Review 2007).

3.Richard Poynder, “Elephants and Dung-Trucks,”Information Today 20, no. 8 (2003), (accessed July 15, 2006), http://www.dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/parade/df04/elephants_and_dung.htm

4.Johan F. Steenbakkers, “Digital Archiving in the Twenty-First Century: Practice at the National Library of the Netherlands,” Library Trends (Summer 2005).

5.Hall R. Varian, “The Future of Electronic Journals: Some Speculations about the Evolution of Academic Electronic Technology Conference: Conference organized by the Andrew W. Foundation atEmoryUniversity,Atlanta,April 24–25, 1997, (accessed January 15, 2007), http://arl.cni.org/scomm/scat/index.html

6.Ziming Liu, “Reading Behavior in the Digital Environment: Changes in Reading Behavior Over the Past Ten Years,” Journal of Documentation 61, no. 6 (2005): 700–712.

7.Carol Tenopir, “Inundated with Data,” (September 2005) http://www.libraryjournal.com (accessed December 15, 2006).

8.Steenbakkers, “Digital Archiving,” Library Trends (Summer, 2005).

9.N.V. Sathyanarayana, “Electronic Journals: Access and Delivery Models,” Information Studies 6(2), (April 2000).

10.David Bearman, “Reality and Chimeras in the Preservation of Electronic Records,” D-Lib Magazine (April, 1999) 5 (4), (accessed December 30, 2006),

http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april99/bearman/04bearman.html

11.PADI (Preserving Access to Digital Information), Standard (2001), (accessed December 11, 2006), http://www.nla.gov.au/padi/topics/43.html

12.Helen Hockx-Yu, “Digital Preservation in the Context of Institutional Repositories,” (accessed September 30, 2006), http://www.eprints.rclis.org/archive/00007351/01/DPinIRs_Final.pdf

13.Dale Flecker, “Preserving Scholarly E-Journals,” D-Lib Magazine (September, 2001) 7 (9), (accessed September 20, 2006), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september01/flecker/09flecker.html

14.Adrienne Muir, “Preservation, Access and Intellectual Property Rights Challenges for Libraries in the Digital Environment,” Institute for Public Policy Research (ippr) (June 2006).

15.Mary Feeney, “Towards a National Strategy for Archiving Digital Materials,”Alexandria 11, no. 2 (1999): 107–122.

16.“Urgent Action Needed to Preserve Scholarly Electronic Journals,” edited by Donald J. Waters, The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, (October 2005): 15.

17.Ibid.

18.Neil McLean, “The Archiving of Electronic Scholarly Information: Executive Summary,” (1998). (accessed January 4, 2007), http://www.unison.nsw.edu.au/

19.Emma Poole, “Digital Knowledge for All, but What about for Ever?” (June, 2005), (accessed January 5, 2007), http://www.mla.gov.uk/resources/assets//M//mla_dpc_survey_pdf_7486.pdf

20.Catherine Ayre and Adrienne Muir, “Right to Preserve? Copyright and Licensing for Digital Preservation Project Final Report,”(Loughborough: Loughborough University, 2004), (accessed January 10, 2007), http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/dils/disresearch/CLDP/Project_reports.htm

21.Robert P. Dellavalle et al., “Going, Going, Gone: Lost Internet References,” Science 302, no. 5646 (October 31, 2003): 787–788.

22.Michael Bugeja and Daniela V. Dimitrova, “The Half-Life Phenomenon: Eroding Citations in Journals,” The Serials Librarian, 49(3)(2005): 117.

23.Eileen Fenton, “Preserving Electronic Scholarly Journals: Portico,” Ariadne (April, 2006): 17, (accessed January 11, 2007), http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue47/fenton/intro.html

24.“Electronic Research Resources” survey of 7,403 faculty conducted in 2003 by Odyssey, a market research firm, on behalf of Ithaka (unpublished).

25.Mark Young and Martha Kyrillidou, ARL Statistics 2003–04, Association of Research Libraries, (Washington, DC: The Association, 2005).

26.Fenton, “Preserving,” 47.

27.Kate O’Donohue, “The Accessing and Archiving of Electronic Journals: Challenges and Implications within the Library World ”The Serials Librarian 49, no. 1–2 (2005): 35–87.

28. Elsevier (Accessed January 05, 2007), http://www.elsevier.nl/

29.“National Library of the Netherlands and Elsevier Science Make Digital Preservation History” (2002). (accessed January 12, 2007), http://www.kb.nl/hrd/dd/dd_links_en_publicaties/publicaties/eskb_pressrelease7_20aug02_def.pdf

30. Elsevier(accessed January 13, 2007), http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/subject_area_browse.cws_home

31.“BASE CONTRACT 092004: Archiving Agreement”, (accessed January 14, 2007), http://www.crl.edu/content/DigArc/KBElsevierArchivingAgreement09200411.pdf

32. Ringgold.com (accessed January 15, 2007), http://www.ringgold.com/directory/cfm/ringgold_dir.cfm?ob_id=1318_and_br_id=2

33. Tandf.co.uk (accessed August 11, 2006), http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/

34.http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/dspace/ (accessed August 29, 2006).

35.http://www.digitalpreservation.gov/ (accessed August 9, 2006).

36.“Urgent Action,” 15.

37.Fenton “Preserving,” 47.

38.Ibid.

39.Ibid.

40. IEEE, (accessed June 22, 2006), http://www.ieee.org/onlinepubs/

41.Steenbakkers, “Digital Archiving,” Library Trends (Summer, 2005).

41. Galyani Moghaddam, Golnessa. “Scholarly Electronic Journal Publishing: A Study Comparing Commercial and Nonprofit/University Publishers,” The Serials Librarian 51, no. 3/4 (2007): 165–183.

42. Robin Dale, “The Center for Research Libraries: Archive Profile of the National Library of the Netherlands,” (2005). (accessed January 8, 2007), http://www.crl.edu/content/DigArc/DigArc2/KBprofile.pdf


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item