Medical Informatics: Concepts and Applications

Aminpour, Farzaneh Medical Informatics: Concepts and Applications. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 2004, vol. 4, n. 2, pp. 88-94. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
Article-Vol4-Num2-ID226.pdf

Download (215kB) | Preview

English abstract

Medical Informatics is a developing body of knowledge concerned with the use of information and communication technology in support of medical research, education and also for promoting health care delivery. The field focuses on the biomedical information, patient data, and also acquisition, storage, retrieval and optimal use of information for problem solving and decision making. The goal of medical informatics is to help health care workers improve their way of working and the outcome of their performances. There is a variety of classification types for the different applications of medical informatics among which Telemedicine, Electronic Medical Records, Information Retrieval and Decision Support Systems are the most important. Different applications of medical informatics can contribute to better outcomes in patient care and decrease the costs of health care services through error reduction, providing patients with their needed information and supporting physicians with updated information and related knowledge.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Medical Informatics, Health Information Management, Information and Communication Technology
Subjects: G. Industry, profession and education. > GA. Information industry.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GB. Software industry.
G. Industry, profession and education. > GC. Computer and telecommunication industry.
D. Libraries as physical collections. > DK. Health libraries, Medical libraries.
A. Theoretical and general aspects of libraries and information. > AC. Relationship of LIS with other fields .
L. Information technology and library technology > LN. Data base management systems.
I. Information treatment for information services > IE. Data and metadata structures.
I. Information treatment for information services > IF. Information transfer: protocols, formats, techniques.
I. Information treatment for information services > IG. Information presentation: hypertext, hypermedia.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BG. Information dissemination and diffusion.
L. Information technology and library technology > LC. Internet, including WWW.
Depositing user: Farzaneh Aminpour
Date deposited: 23 Aug 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:09
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10261

References

1. Van Der Maas AAF, Ten Hoopen AJ, Ter Hofstede AHA. Progress with formalizing in medical informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8(2): 126-30.

2 For the record: Protecting electronic health information. Washington: National Academy Press. 1997.

3. Hersh W. What is medical informatics? Available at: http://www.ohsu.edu/dmice/whatis/index.shtml

4. Introduction to medical informatics. Available at: http://euclid.ii.metu.edu.tr/~ion535/demo/lecture_notes/week1-3.html

5. Lindenberg DAB. NLM long range plan. Report of the board of regents. 1998: 31.

6. Healthfield HA, Wyatt J. Medical informatics: hiding our light under a bushel, or the emperor's new clothes? Methods Inform Med 1993; 32(2): 181-2.

7. Medical informatics. Origin of the term "Medical Informatics". Available from: http://www.veranda.com.ph/hemant/origin.htm

8. Stanberry B. Telemedicine: barriers and opportunities in the 21st century. J Internal Med 2000; 247(6): 615-28.

9. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press. 2000. Available from: http://books.nap.edu/html/to_err_is_human/

10. Imhoff M, Webb A, Goldschmidt A. Health informatics. Intensive Care Med 2001; 27(1): 179-86.

11. Levy AH. Is informatics a basic medical science? Proceeding of MEDINFO. 1977: 979.

12. Preliminary announcement for the Third World Conference on Medical Informatics. MEDINFO 80. 1997.

13. Van Bemmel JH. The structure of medical informatics. Medical Informatics 1984; 9: 175.

14. Blois MS, Shortliffe EH. The computer meets medicine: emergence of a discipline. Medical Informatics. Computer Applications in Health Care. 1990: 20.

15. Myer JD. Medical education in the information age. Proceedings of the Symposium on Medical Informatics. 1986: 3.

16. Medical Informatics. Definitions of medical informatics. Available from: http://www.veranda.com.ph/hemant/definitions.htm

17. British Medical Informatics Society. Available from: http://www.bmis.org. Accessed April 26, 2004.

18. Stanberry B. Legal, Ethical and risk issues in telemedicine. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2001; 64(3): 225-33.

19. Coiera E. Guide to medical informatics, the internet and telemedicine. London: Chapman & Hall Co. 1997.

20. Baldwin LP, Clarke M, Eldabi T, Jones RW. Telemedicine and its role in improving communication in healthcare. Logistics Information Management 2002; 15(4): 309-19.

21. Rao SS. Integrated health care and telemedicine. Work Study 2001; 50(6): 222-9.

22. Grigsby J, Kaehny MM, Sandberg EJ, Schlenker RE. Effects and effectiveness of telemedicine. Health Care Financ Rev 1995; 17(1): 115-31.

23. Wootton R. Telemedicine. Br Med J 2001; 323(7312): 557-60.

24. Layman E. Health informatics: ethical issues. Health Care Manag 2003; 22(1): 2-15.

25. Dick RS, Steen EB, Detmer DE. The computer-based patient record: an essential technology for health care. Revised ed. Washington: National Academy Press. 1997.

26. Bates DW, Boyle DL, Teich JM. Impact of computerized physician order entry on physician time: proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1994. Washington: Heinley & Befus Co.1994: 996.

27. Shu K, Boyle D, Spurr C. Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry. Medinfo 2001; 10: 1207-11.

28. Overhage JM, Perkins S, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ. Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians` time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 361-71.

29. Gostin LO. National health information privacy: regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. JAMA 2001; 285: 3015-21.

30. Fox S, Rainie L, The online health care revolution: how the web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_Health_Report.pdf

31. Taylor H, Leitman R. The increasing impact of eHealth on physician behavior. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2001vol1_iss31.pdf

32. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet. JAMA 1997; 277: 1244-5.

33. Systems designed to support a decision research process for complex problems. Available from: http://www.geog.plymouth.ac.uk/research/groups/ALC/finalDisk/glossary.htm

34. Hersh WR. Medical informatics: improving health care through information. JAMA 2002; 288(16): 1955-8.

35. Miller RA, Medical diagnostic decision support systems- past, present and future. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994; 1: 8-27.

36. Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001; 8: 299-308.

37. Hunt DL, Haynes RB, Hanna SE, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. JAMA 1998; 280: 1339-46.

38. Farukhi F. Clinical decision support systems. Available from: http://www.cwru.edu/med/epidbio/mphp439/Clinical_Decision.htm


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item