The pure h-index: calculating an author’s h-index by taking co-authors into account

Wan, Jin-kun and Hua, Ping-huan and Rousseau, Ronald The pure h-index: calculating an author’s h-index by taking co-authors into account., 2007 [Preprint]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
pure_h.pdf
Download (47kB) | Preview

English abstract

We introduce a new Hirsch-type index for a scientist. This so-called pure h-index takes the actual number of co-authors, and the scientist’s relative position in the byline into account. The transformation from h to the pure h-index can also be applied to the R-index, leading to the pure R-index. This index takes the number of collaborators, possibly the rank in the byline and the actual number of citations into account.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: h-index, Hirsch index, co-authorship, pure or co-author adapted h-index, R-index
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Ronald Rousseau
Date deposited: 13 Sep 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:09
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10376

References

Pablo D. Batista, Mônica G. Campiteli, Osame Kinouchi, and Alexandre S. Martinez (2006). “Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?,” Scientometrics, volume 68, number 1, pp.179-189.

Quentin Burrell (2007). “Should the h-index be discounted?,” In: W. Glänzel and A. Schubert (editors). The multidimensional world of Tibor Braun. Leuven: ISSI, pp. 65-68.

Quentin Burrell, and Ronald Rousseau (1995). “Fractional counts for authorship attribution: a numerical study,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, volume 46, number 2, pp. 97-102.

Jonathan R. Cole, and Stephen Cole (1973). “Social stratification in science”. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Leo Egghe (2007). “Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship”. Preprint

Leo Egghe, Ronald Rousseau, and Guido Van Hooydonk (2000). “Methods for accrediting publications to authors or countries: consequences for evaluation studies,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science, volume 51, number 2, pp. 145-157.

Wolfgang Glänzel (2006).”On the opportunities and limitations of the h-index,” Science Focus, volume 1, number 1, pp. 10-11 (in Chinese). English version available at E-LIS: ID-code 9535.

Jorge E. Hirsch (2005). “An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output,“ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, number 46, pp. 16569-16572.

Bihui Jin (2007). “The AR-index: complementing the h-index,” ISSI Newsletter, volume 3, number 1, p.6.

Bihui Jin, Liming Liang, Ronald Rousseau, and Leo Egghe (2007). “The R- and AR-indices: complementing the h-index, “ Chinese Science Bulletin, volume 52, number 6, pp. 855-863.

Duncan Lindsey (1980). “Production and citation measures in the sociology of science: the problem of multiple authorship,” Social Studies of Science, volume 10, number 2, pp. 145-162.

Charles Oppenheim (1998). “Fractional counting of multiauthored publications,“ Journal of the American Society for Information Science, volume 49, number 5, p. 482.

Derek de Solla Price (1981). “Multiple authorship,” Science, volume 212, issue 4498, p. 987.

Guido Van Hooydonk (1997). “Fractional counting of multi-authored publications: consequences for the impact of authors, “ Journal of the American Society for Information Science, volume 48, number 10, pp. 944-945.

Harriet Zuckerman (1968). “Patterns of name-ordering among authors of scientific papers: a study of social symbolism and its ambiguity, “ American Journal of Sociology, volume 74, number 3, pp. 276-291.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS