Tam Metin Makale Kullanım Verilerinin Bibliyometrik Analizi

Al, Umut and Tonta, Yaşar Tam Metin Makale Kullanım Verilerinin Bibliyometrik Analizi., 2007 . In Değişen Dünyada Bilgi Yönetimi Sempozyumu 24-26 Ekim 2007, Ankara Bildiriler, Ankara (Turkey), 24-26 October 2007. [Conference paper]

[thumbnail of Al-Tonta.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
Al-Tonta.pdf
Download (353kB) | Preview

English abstract

The main objective of collection management in libraries is to provide information sources needed by library users. The most frequently used information sources in collections are determined by carrying out usage analysis studies. This paper aims to investigate the most frequently used journal titles along with their subjects and years, and the relationship between journal use and impact factors. Transaction logs of more than one million articles that were downloaded from ScienceDirect electronic journals database by the users of Hacettepe University Libraries during 2002-2006 were used for analysis. Each record contained COUNTER-based (Counting Online Usage of Networked Information Resources) data about downloaded article (such as journal name, year, and so on). More articles were downloaded in health sciences. The average number of downloaded articles per journal were higher in chemistry, pharmacology, chemical engineering, medicine and neurology. Journals with high impact factors were also used more often (Pearson’s r = .194, p .01). A small number of core journals in each subject satisfied one third of all downloaded articles. These findings will help Hacettepe University Libraries better manage its licensed journals collection. Training sessions can be increased for ScienceDirect journals (and subjects) that were less-frequently used. Use data can be used to support license agreements.

Turkish abstract

Kütüphanelerde koleksiyon yönetiminin temel amacı kullanıcıların ihtiyaç duydukları bilgi kaynaklarını hizmete sunmaktır. Koleksiyonlarda yer alan ve en çok yararlanılan bilgi kaynakları kullanım analizi yapılarak saptanır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; Hacettepe Üniversitesi kullanıcılarının ScienceDirect elektronik dergi veri tabanından indirdikleri makalelere dayanarak en sık kullanılan dergileri, bu dergilerin konularını ve en yoğun kullanıldıkları yılları saptamak ve bir dergiden indirilen makale sayısıyla o derginin etki faktörü arasında bir ilişki olup olmadığını incelemektir. Bu amaçla Hacettepe Üniversitesinin beş yıllık (2002-2006) ScienceDirect kullanım verileri analiz edilmiştir. Bir milyondan fazla makaleye ilişkin kullanım verileri (dergi adı, yayın yılı, vd.) COUNTER (Counting Online Usage of Networked Information Resources) aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Sağlık bilimleriyle ilgili dergilerden daha çok makale indirilmiştir. Kimya, farmakoloji, kimya mühendisliği, tıp ve nöroloji konularında dergi başına indirilen ortalama makale sayıları daha yüksektir. Etki faktörü yüksek olan dergiler nispeten biraz daha fazla kullanılmaktadır(Pearson’s r = 0,194, p 0,01). Her konuda yayımlanan az sayıda çekirdek dergi indirilen makalelerin önemli bir kısmını karşılamaktadır. ScienceDirect elektronik dergi veri tabanı kullanımıyla ilgili bulgular Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphanelerinin dergi koleksiyonunu daha iyi yönetmesine yardımcı olabilir. ScienceDirect veri tabanının nispeten daha az kullanıldığı disiplinlere yönelik eğitim çalışmaları artırılabilir. Lisans anlaşması imzalanırken kullanım verileri dayanak olarak kullanılabilir.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: Kullanım analizi, kullanım istatistikleri, ScienceDirect, veri tabanlarının kullanımı, koleksiyon yönetimi; usage analysis, usage statistics, ScienceDirect, usage of databases, collection management
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: prof. yasar tonta
Date deposited: 21 Nov 2007
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:09
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/10637

References

Ball, D. (2004). What’s the “big deal”, and why is it a bad deal for universities? Interlending & Document Supply, 32(2), 117-125.

Batı, H. (2006). Elektronik bilgi kaynaklarında maliyet-yarar analizi: Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi üzerinde bir değerlendirme. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Case, M.M. (2004). A snapshot in time: ARL libraries and electronic journal resources. ARL Bimonthly Report, 235. 14 Ocak 2007 tarihinde http://www.arl.org/newsltr/235/snapshot.html adresinden erişildi.

Chrzastowski, T.E. (2003). Making the transition from print to electronic serial collections: A new model for academic chemistry libraries? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1141-1148.

Cooper, M.D. ve McGregor, G.F. (1994). Using article photocopy data in bibliographic models for journal collection management. Library Quarterly, 64, 386-413.

COUNTER. (2006). About COUNTER. 27 Ocak 2007 tarihinde http://www.projectcounter.org/about.html adresinden erişildi.

Davis, P.M. (2002). Patterns in electronic journal usage: Challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College & Research Libraries, 63, 484-497.

Dilek-Kayaoğlu, H. (2006). Açık erişim kavramı ve gelişmekte olan bir ülke olarak Türkiye için anlamı. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 20, 29-60.

Duranceau, E.F. (2004). Cornell and the future of the big deal: An interview with Ross Atkinson. Serials Review, 30(2), 127-130.

Egghe, L. ve Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 6 Şubat 2007 tarihinde http://hdl.handle.net/1942/587 adresinden erişildi.

Frazier, K. (2001). The librarians' dilemma: Contemplating the costs of the "big deal". D-Lib Magazine, 7(3). 6 Şubat 2007 tarihinde http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march01/frazier/03frazier.html adresinden erişildi.

Galbraith, B. (2002). Journal retention decisions incorporating use-statistics as a measure of value. Collection Management, 27(1), 79-90.

Garfield, E. (1994). The impact factor: ISI. Current Contents, 25, 3-7. 14 Ocak 2007 tarihinde http://thomsonscientific.com/knowtrend/essays/journalcitationreports/impactfactor/ adresinden erişildi.

Garfield, E. (1980). Bradford’s Law and related statistical patterns. Current Contents, 19, 5-12. 6 Şubat 2007 tarihinde http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v4p476y1979-80.pdf adresinden erişildi.

Haar, J. (2000). Project PEAK: Vanderbilt’s experience with articles on demand. Serials Librarian, 38(1/2), 91-99.

Hacettepe Üniversitesi Kütüphaneleri. (2006). 14 Ocak 2007 tarihinde http://www.library.hacettepe.edu.tr adresinden erişildi.

Hamaker, C. (2003). Quantity, quality and the role of consortia. What’s the Big Deal? Journal purchasing – bulk buying or cherry picking? Strategic issues for librarians, publishers, agents and intermediaries. Association of Subscription Agents and Intermediaries (ASA) Conference (24-25 February 2003). 14 Ocak 2007 tarihinde http://www.subscription-agents.org/conference/200302/chuck.hamaker.pps adresinden erişildi.

Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. H.F. Moed, W. Glänzel ve U. Schmoch (Ed.) Handbook of quantitative social science and technology research içinde (s. 473-496). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. 7 Şubat 2007 tarihinde http://www.tpac.gatech.edu/papers/4lit.PDF adresinden erişildi

Hunter, K. (2000). PEAK and Elsevier Science. PEAK Conference, Ann Arbor, 23 March 2000. 6 Şubat 2007 tarihinde http://www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/hunter.pdf adresinden erişildi.

Institute for Scientific Information. (2004a). Journal Citation Reports Science Edition. 10 Şubat 2006 tarihinde http://jcrweb.com adresinden erişildi.

Institute for Scientific Information. (2004b). Journal Citation Reports Social Science Edition. 10 Şubat 2006 tarihinde http://jcrweb.com adresinden erişildi.

Jaguszewski, J.M. ve Probst, L.K. (2000). The impact of electronic resources on serial cancellations and remote storage decisions in academic research libraries. Library Trends, 48(4), 799-820.

Johnson, R.K. (2004). Open access: Unclocking the value of scientific research. Journal of Library Administration, 42(2), 107-124.

Kaygusuz, A. ve Benek, B. (2006). Elektronik ortamda konsorsiyum yönetimi. XI. “Türkiye’de Internet” Konferansı 21-23 Aralık 2006 TOBB Ekonomi ve Teknoloji Üniversitesi, Ankara’da sunulan bildiri. 5 Şubat 2007 tarihinde http://inet-tr.org.tr/inetconf11/sunum/50.ppt adresinden erişildi.

Ke, H-R., Kwakkelaar, R., Tai, Y-M. ve Chen, L-C. (2002). Exploring behavior of E-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier’s ScienceDirect OnSite in Taiwan. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 265-291.

Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y. ve Warner, J. (1996). The role of monographs in scholarly communication: an empirical study of philosophy, sociology and economics. Journal of Documentation, 52, 389-404.

McDonald, J.D. (2007). Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 39-50.

Moed, H.F., Van Leeuwen, Th.N. ve Reedijk, J. (1998). A new classification system to describe the ageing of scientific journals and their impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54, 387-419.

Montgomery, C.H. (2002). An electronic journal impact study: The factors that change when an academic library migrates from print. 23rd Annual IATUL Conference, 2-6 June 2002, Kansas City. 14 Ocak 2007 tarihinde http://www.iatul.org/conference/proceedings/vol12/papers/Montgomery.pdf adresinden erişildi.

Pan, E. (1978). Journal citation as a predictor of journal usage in libraries. Collection Management, 2(1), 29-38.

Pullinger, D. (1999). Academics and new information environment: the impact of local factors on use of electronic journals. Journal of Information Science, 25, 164-172.

Rusch-Feja, D. ve Siebky, U. (1999). Evaluation of usage and acceptance of electronic journals: Results of an electronic survey of Max Planck society researchers including usage statistics from Elsevier, Springer and Academic Press (Full report). D-Lib Magazine, 5(10). 14 Ocak 2007 tarihinde http://www.dlib.org/dlib/october99/rusch-feja/10rusch-feja-full-report.html adresinden erişildi.

Scales, P.A. (1976). Citation analyses as indicators of the use of serials: A comparison of ranked title lists produced by citation counting and from use data. Journal of Documentation, 32, 17-25.

Schloegl, C. ve Gorraiz, J. (2006). Document delivery as a source for bibliometric analyses: the case of Subito. Journal of Information Science, 32(3), 223-237.

ScienceDirect Info. (2006). 17 Aralık 2006 tarihinde http://info.sciencedirect.com/ adresinden erişildi.

Shepherd, P.T. (2004). COUNTER: towards reliable vendor usage statistics. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 34(4), 184-189.

Stern, M. (1983). Characteristics of the literature of literary scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 44, 199-209.

Tomney, H. ve Burton, P.F. (1998). Electronic journals: a study of usage and attitudes among academics. Journal of Information Science, 24, 419-429.

Tonta, Y. ve Ünal, Y. (2005). Scatter of journals and literature obsolescence reflected in document delivery requests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 84-94.

Tsay, M-Y. (1998a). Library journal use and citation half-life in medical science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 1283-1292.

Tsay, M-Y. (1998b). The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 86, 31-39.

Tsay, M-Y. (1999). Library journal use and citation age in medical science. Journal of Documentation, 55, 543-555.

Vaughan, K.T.L. (2003). Changing use patterns of print journals in the digital age: Impacts of electronic equivalents on print chemistry journal use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 1149-1152.

Wiley, L. ve Chrzastowski, T.E. (2002). The Illinois Interlibrary Loan Assesment Project II: revisiting statewide article sharing and assessing the impact of electronic full-text journals. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 26(1), 19-33.

Wulff, J.L. ve Nixon, N.D. (2004). Quality markers and use of electronic journals in an academic health sciences library. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92, 315-322.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS