Local Evaluation of Chemistry Journals

Kraus, Joseph R. and Hansen, Rachel Local Evaluation of Chemistry Journals., 2008 [Preprint]


Download (216kB) | Preview

English abstract

This paper reports on the evaluation of local usage statistics of a specific set of chemistry journals at the University of Denver in Colorado, USA. The objective of the study is to demonstrate that commercial publishers in chemistry charge considerably more for their journals than those from the non-commercial sector. There are three variables that are considered in this research: institutional cost of the journal, cost per Thomson Scientific Impact Factor (IF), and cost per article downloaded. In the defined set of 65 journals, it is found that commercial publishers charge more for their journals by a ratio of 2.59. Commercial publishers cost more per impact factor by a ratio of 3.20 and significantly more per local article download by a ratio of 6.16. This research demonstrates that local usage statistics should be used as part of the journal evaluation process.

Item type: Preprint
Keywords: chemistry journals, usage statistics, information use
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HA. Periodicals, Newspapers.
Depositing user: Joseph Kraus
Date deposited: 01 Jul 2008
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:11
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/11832


Association of Research Libraries. 1999. Measuring the cost effectiveness of journals: the Wisconsin experience. ARL Bimonthly Report 205. [Online]. Available: http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/wisconsin.pdf [June 27, 2008].

Barschall, H.H. 1988. The cost-effectiveness of physics journals. Physics Today 41(7):56-59.

Burgard, D.E. 1999. The sure things in life: serials crisis and cancellation information on the World Wide Web. Serials Review 25(2):69-75.

Casey, C.P. 2004. Challenges for chemists, chemistry, and ACS. Chemical and Engineering News 82(1):2-5.

Chrzastowski, T.E & Olesko B.M. 1997. Chemistry journal use and cost: results of a longitudinal study. Library Resources and Technical Services 41(2):101-111.

Committee on Professional Training, American Chemical Society. 2008. Undergraduate professional education in chemistry: ACS guidelines and evaluation procedures for bachelor’s degree programs, Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society. [Online]. Available: http://portal.acs.org/portal/fileFetch/C/WPCP_008491/pdf/WPCP_008491.pdf [June 27, 2008].

Davis, P. 2002. Where to spend our e-journal money? Defining a university library's core collection through citation analysis. portal 2(1):155-166.

Eysenbach, G. 2006. Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles. PLoS Biology 4(5):e157. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0040157 [June 27, 2008].

Flaxbart, D. 2001. Conversations with chemists: information-seeking behavior of chemistry faculty in the electronic age. Science and Technology Libraries 21(3/4):5-26

Garfield, E. 1994. Using the impact factor. Current Contents July 18(no. 29):3–5.

Garfield, E. 2006. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 295(1):90-93.

Gooden, A.M. 2001. Citation Analysis of Chemistry Doctoral Dissertations: An Ohio State University Case Study. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 32. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/01-fall/refereed.html [June 27, 2008].

Greco, A.N., Wharton, R.M., Estelami H. & Jones R.F. 2006. The state of scholarly journal publishing: 1981-2000. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 37(3):155-214.

Hallmark, J. 2004. Access and retrieval of recent journal articles: a comparative study of chemists and geoscientists. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 40. [Online]. Available:http://www.istl.org/04-summer/article1.html [June 27, 2008].

Harnad, S. & Brody, T. 2004. Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine 10(6). [Online] Available: http://dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html [June 27, 2008].

Hill, J.B., Madarash-Hill, C. & Hayes, N. 1999. Monitoring serials use in a science and technology library: results of a ten year study at the University of Akron. Science & Technology Libraries 18(1):89-103.

Jacobs, N., ed. 2006. Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects, Oxford, UK.: Chandos.

Kraus, J.R. 2004. Changing use patterns in academic libraries: the case of chemistry journals. Presented as a poster paper at the 2004 American Association for the Advancement of Science - Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division Meeting. [Online]. Available: http://mysite.du.edu/~jokraus/AAAS/AAAS-SWARMposter.html [June 27, 2008].

Michaelson, B. 2008. The American Chemical Society and Open Access. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 53. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/08-winter/viewpoint.html [June 27, 2008].

Miller, R.H. 2000. Electronic resources and academic libraries, 1980-2000: a historical perspective. Library Trends 48(4):645-670.

Nisonger, T.E. 2001. Approaches, techniques, and criteria for serials evaluation in the electronic environment. Serials Review 40(3/4):393-407.

Perneger, T.V. 2004. Relation between online “hit counts" and subsequent citations: prospective study of research papers in the BMJ. British Medical Journal 329(7465):546-547.

PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. The Impact Factor Game. PLoS Medicine 3(6):e291. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291 [June 27, 2008].

Rossner, M., van Epps, H. & Hill E. 2007. Show me the data. Journal of Cell Biology 179(6):1091-1092.

Rovner, S. 2008. Measure will establish a repository of journal articles by Harvard's faculty. Chemical and Engineering News 86(7):8.

Stringer, M.J., Sales-Pardo, M. & Nunes Amaral, L.A. 2008. Effectiveness of Journal Ranking Schemes as a Tool for Locating Information. PLoS ONE 3(2):e1683.[Online]. Available: http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0001683 [June 27, 2008].

Vallmitjana, N. & Sabaté L.G. 2008. Analysis of Ph.D. dissertation references as a tool for collection management in an academic chemistry library. College & Research Libraries 69(1):72-81.

Van Orsdel, L.C. and Born, K. 2007. Serial wars. Library Journal 132(7):43-48.

Willinsky, J. 2006. The Access Principle: the Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item