Awareness and empowerment in document production and distribution as a "must" for open access: Experiences from the "Nancy style" to guarantee quality

De Castro P, Salinetti S. “Uniform Requirements” for grey literature: proposal for the adoption of “Nancy style”. Publishing Research Quarterly 2006;22(1):12-7.

Grey Literature International Steering Committee. Guidelines for the production of scientific and technical reports. Version 1.0. GLISC; 2006. Available at: http://www.glisc.info; last visited Nov. 14, 2006.

Conn VS, Valentine JC, Cooper HM, Rantz MJ. Grey Literature in meta-analyses. Nursing Research 2003;52(4):256-61.

Benzies KM, Premji S, Hayden KA, Serrett K. State-of-the-evidence reviews: advantages and challenges of including grey literature. Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing 2006;3(2):55-61.

ANSI/NISO. Scientific and Technical Reports – Preparation, Presentation, and Preservation. Bethesda, MD: NISO Press; 2005. (Standard Z39.18-2005). Available at: http://www.niso.org/standards/resources/Z39-18-2005.pdf; last visited Nov. 14, 2006.

De Castro P, Salinetti S. Writing and issuing Grey literature. Chapter 1-3.6. In: Science Editors Handbook. European Association of Science Editors; 2006.

De Castro P. Scientists produce and use grey literature, but are they aware of the implications of doing so? European Science Editing 2006;32(4):95-7.

Banks M. Towards a continuum of scholarship: the eventual collapse of the distinction between grey and non-grey literature. Publishing Research Quarterly 2006;22(1): 4-11