La evaluación de la alfabetización informacional. Principios, metodologías y retos (The evaluation of information literacy. Principles, methodologies and challenges)

Licea de Arenas, Judith La evaluación de la alfabetización informacional. Principios, metodologías y retos (The evaluation of information literacy. Principles, methodologies and challenges). Anales de Documentación, 2007, vol. 10, pp. 215-232. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of ad1012.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
ad1012.pdf
Download (177kB) | Preview

English abstract

The evaluation of information literacy (IL) is a must. Institutions may use results for improving programmes, for management purposes or for decision-making. Therefore, a literature review is carried out to orient information professionals toward topics such as: who has to do the evaluation, how to do it, as well as suggestions on how to perform evaluation activities. Tips for self-evaluation are included as well as questions regarding the challenges of evaluation for librarians and library schools.

Spanish abstract

La evaluación de la alfabetización informacional (ALFIN) es obligada cuando se trata de mejorar programas, utilizar las evidencias recabadas con fines administrativos o tomar decisiones relacionadas con la comunidad a la que sirve la institución donde se desarrollan. Por tanto, se hace una revisión de la literatura relacionada con quién debe hacer la evaluación, cómo hacerla y sugerencias para hacerla. Asimismo se presentan los puntos mínimos para la auto evaluación y preguntas acerca de los retos de la evaluación tanto para los profesionales de la información como para las universidades que los forman.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Alfabetización informacional; Evaluación; Information literacy; Evaluation.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
B. Information use and sociology of information
C. Users, literacy and reading. > CE. Literacy.
Depositing user: Anales de Documentación Revista
Date deposited: 28 Jul 2008
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:12
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/12094

References

BLOOM, BS. Taxonomía de los objetivos de la educación: clasificación de las metas educacionales. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo; 1971.

BOBER, C.; PULIN S. y VILENO, L. Evaluating library instruction in academic libraries: a critical review of the literature, 1980-1993. Reference Librarian 1995; 51-52, 1995.

BRABAZON, T. Bonfire of the literacies? The Internet and challenges to literacy. Social Alternatives 2002; 21.

BROWN, J.; COLLINS, A. y DUGUID, P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 1989; 18: 32-42.

BYSTRÖM, K. y JÄRVELIN, K. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management 1995; 31: 191-213.

BYSTRÖM, K. y JÄRVELIN, K. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management 1995; 31: 191-213.

BYSTRÖM, K. Task complexity, information types and information sources. Examination of relationships. [Tesis] Tampere: University of Tampere; 1999.

DE JAGER, K. y NASSIMBENI, M. An exploration of the current status of information literacy tuition in South African tertiary institutions and proposals for curriculum design. South African Journal of Library and Information Science 2003; 69: 108-114.

DERVIN, B. y DEWDNEY, P. Neutral questioning: a new approach to the reference interview. RQ 1986: 506-513.

DERVIN, B. An overview or sense-making research: concepts, methods and results to date. En: Internacional Communications Association Annual Meeting. Dallas TX.; 1983.

DERVIN, B. From the mind´s eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. En: Qualitative research on information management. Englewood CO: Libraries Unlimited; 1992. p. 61-84.

DIETERICH, H. Nueva guía para la investigación científica. México; 1996.

DURKHEIM, E. Las reglas del método sociológico. México: Quinto Sol; 19--.

FAGAN, J. C. Selecting test item types to evaluate library skills. Research Strategies 2001; 18: 121-132.

FAGAN, J. C. Selecting test item types to evaluate library skills. Research Strategies 2001; 18: 121-132.

FENSKE, R. y ROSELLE, A. Proving the efficacy of library instruction evaluation. Research Strategies 1999; 16:175-185.

FJALLBRANT, N. y MALLEY, I. User education in libraries. London: Clive Bingley;1984.

GREGORY, V. L. The changing library education curriculum. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology 2005; 5: 2799-2802.

HÄBERLE, N. Developing a framework for information literacy interventions. [Tesis] Johannesburg: Cape Technikon, Faculty of Education; 2001.

HENNE F. School libraries. En: Library surveys. New York: Columbia University; 1967. p. 189-211.

IANNUZZI, P. We are teaching, but are they learning: accountability, productivity, and assessment. Journal of Academic Librarianship 1999; 25: 304-305.

INGWERSEN, P. y JÄRVELIN, K. The turn: integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005.

INGWERSEN, P. y JÄRVELIN, K. The turn: integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dodrecht: Springer; 2005.

JÄRVELIN, K. y VAKKARI, P. The evolution of library and information science 1965-1985: A content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing & Management 1993; 29: 129-144.

KAPITZKE, C. Information literacy: a positivist epistemology and a politics of information. Educational Theory 2003; 53:37.

KENNEDY, C. Teaching information literacy to the advanced writing class in three sessions. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship. 2005; 6(1/2).

KENNEDY, C. Teaching information literacy to the advanced writing class in three sessions. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship. 2005; 6(1/2).

KIRBY, J.; LIDDLARD, L. y MOORE, K. Empowering the information user: new ways into user education. London: Library Association; 1998.

KUHLTHAU, C. C. Inside the search process: information seeking from the user´s per-spective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1991; 42: 361-371.

LIGHTFOOT, W. S. Implementing an online academic evaluation system. Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology 2005; 3:1402-1407.

LINDAUER, B. G. The three arenas of information literacy assessment. Reference & User Services Quarterly 2004; 44:122-129.

LINE, M. Library surveys: an introduction to their use, planning, procedure and presenta-tion. London: Clive Bingley; 1967.

MAKI, P. L. Developing an assessment plan to learn about learning. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2002; 28:8-13.

MARTIN, J. y LANCASTER, F. W. Investigative methods in information science: an introduction. Arlington VA; Information Resources; 1981.

ORR, D.; APPLETON, M. y TALLIN, M. Information literacy and flexible delivery: creating a conceptual framework and model. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2001; 27:457. 7 p.

ROJAS SORIANO, R. Guía para realizar investigaciones sociales. 34 ed. México: Plaza y Valdés; 2002.

SANBORN, L. Improving library instruction: faculty collaboration. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005; 31: 477-481.

SCHAMBER, L. Time-line interviews and inductive content análisis: their effectiveness for exploring cognitive behaviors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2000; 51: 734-744.

URSIN, L.; LINDSAY, E. B. y JOHSON, C. M. Assessing library instruction in the freshman seminar: a citation analysis study. Reference Services Review 2004; 32: 284-292.

VAKKARI, P. y HAKALA, N. Changes in relevant criteria and problem stages in task performance. Journal of Documentation 2000; 56: 540-562.

WARNER, D. A. Programmatic assessment: turning process into practice by teaching for learning. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2003; 29:169, 8 p.

WEETMAN, J. Osmosis: does it work for the development of information literacy? Journal of Academic Librarianship 2005; 31: 456-460.

WERNER, D. A. Programmatic assessment: turning process into practice by teaching for learning. Journal of Academic Librarianship 2003; 29: 169.

YOUNG, R. M. y HARMONY, S. Working with faculty to design undergraduate information literacy programs: A how-to-do-it manual for librarians. New York: Neal-Schuman; 1999. p. 73-91.

YOUNG, R. M. y HARMONY, S. Working with faculty to design undergraduate information literacy programs. New York: Neal-Schuman; 1999.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS