Between fetishism and survival : is the scientific article an academic commodity?

Castiel, Luis D. and Sanz-Valero, Javier Between fetishism and survival : is the scientific article an academic commodity? Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 2007, vol. 23, n. 12, pp. 3041-3050. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of fetishism_english_version[1].pdf]
Preview
 PDF
fetishism_english_version[1].pdf
Download (60kB) | Preview

English abstract

This article discusses the possible meanings of the intense prevailing concern in academic circles over the notion of research productivity, as reflected in an excess number of articles published in various scientific journals. The numerical accounting of articles published by researchers in scientific journals with renowned academic status serves to legitimize academics in their fields of work, in various ways. In this sense, we suggest that scientific articles take on aspects of merchandise-as-fetish, according to Marx's theory of use-value and exchange-value and Benjamin's exposure value. Meanwhile, the biological notions of selection and evolution are used as metaphorical elements in "bibliographic Darwinism". There are references as to the possibility many of the prevailing bibliometric concerns serve as instruments for econometric analysis, especially to orient and enhance cost-effectiveness analysis in research investments of various orders and types, from the point of view of their economic return.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Journal Article; Periodicals; Scientific Communication and Diffusion.
Subjects: B. Information use and sociology of information > BC. Information in society.
Depositing user: Javier Sanz-Valero
Date deposited: 05 Aug 2008
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:12
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/12153

References

Glanzel W, Leta J, Thijs B. Science in Brazil. Part 1: a macro-level comparative study. Scientometrics 2006; 67:67-86.

Coimbra Jr. CEA. Fórum: produção científica e avaliação em Saúde Pública. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19:1845-6.

Luz MT. Prometeu acorrentado: análise sociológica da categoria produtividade e as condições atuais da vida acadêmica. Physis (Rio J) 2005; 15:39-57.

Caponi S, Rebelo F. Sobre juízes e profissões: a avaliação de um campo disciplinar complexo. Physis (Rio J) 2005; 15:59-82.

Collins HM. Tantalus and the aliens: publications, audiences, and the search for gravitational waves. Soc Stud Sci 1999; 29:163-97.

Gunsalus CK. Ethics: sending out the message. Science 1997; 276:335.

Nuñez-Jover J. La ciencia y la tecnología como procesos sociales. Lo que la educación científica no debería olvidar. Madrid: Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos. http://www.campus-oei.org/salactsi/nunez06.htm (accessed 28/May/2006).

Viqueira JP. Propiedad intelectual versus conocimiento. El debate sobre “acceso abierto”. Michoacán: Centro Público de Investigación CONACYT; 2005. http://www.colmich.edu.mx/relaciones/104/pdf/documento.pdf (accessed 28/May/2006).

Hudson-Jones A. Changing traditions of authorship. In: Hudson-Jones A, McLellan F, editors. Ethical issues in biomedical research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000. p. 3-29.

Gaceta Sanitaria. Normas para autores de Gaceta Sanitaria.

http://www.doyma.es/revista/info/pdf/138Normas.pdf (accessed 12/Oct/2006).

Sanz-Valero J, Castiel LD, Wanden-Berghe C, Quilis VJ. Internet y la búsqueda de información en Salud Pública: desde la relevancia hacia la “revelancia”. Gac Sanit 2006; 20:159-60.

Weed DL. Preventing scientific misconduct. Am J Public Health 1998; 88:125-9.

Syrett KL, Rudner LM. Authorship ethics. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 1996; 5(1). http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=1 (accessed 01/Jun/2006).

Hersh WR. Information Retrieval: A Health and Biomedical Perspective. 2nd Ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.

Fourez G. A construção das ciências: introdução à filosofia e à ética das ciências. São Paulo: Editora Unesp; 1995.

Latour B. Essays on science and society: from the world of science to the world of research? Science 1998; 280:208-9.

Acquarone F. Grandes benfeitores da humanidade. Rio de Janeiro: Irmãos Pongetti Editora; 1945.

Merton RK. La sociología de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 1977.

Hagstrom WO. El don como principio organizador de la ciencia. In: Barnes B, editor. Estudios sobre sociología de la ciencia. Madrid: Alianza Editorial; 1980. p. 103-18.

Stengers I. Quem tem medo das ciências. Ciências e poderes. Rio de Janeiro: Edições Siciliano; 1990.

Hackett EJ. Essential tensions: identity, control, and risk in research. Soc Stud Sci 2005;35:787-826.

Coimbra Jr. CEA. Produção científica em saúde pública e as bases bibliográficas internacionais. Cad Saúde Pública 1999; 15:883-8.

BMJ. Instructions for authors. http://bmj.bmj journals.com/advice/ (accessed 12/Oct/2006).

Arranz M. ¿Escribir o publicar? Las reglas del juego. Gac Sanit 2003; 17:90-1.

Albert T. Cómo escribir artículos científicos fácilmente. Gac Sanit 2002; 16:354-7.

Marx K. Das Kapital, Gateway Editions, Washington, D.C.; 2000.

Benjamin W. A obra de arte na era de sua reprodutibilidade técnica. In: Benjamin W, organizador. Magia e técnica, arte e política. 7a Ed. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense; 1994. p. 165-96.

Agamben G. Profanaciones. Barcelona: Anagrama; 2005.

Kuhn T. A estrutura das revoluções científicas. 4ª Ed. São Paulo: Editora Perspectiva; 1996.

Gunn IP. Death of a journal: lost opportunities, new challenges, or both? CRNA 2000;11:197.

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. JECH: top ten articles of 2005. http://jech.bmjjournals.com/misc/topten05.dtl (accessed 12/Jun/2006).

Sage Journals Online. The 50 most frequently read articles. http://sss.sagepub.com/reports/mfr1.dtl (accessed 12/Jun/2006).

Velho L. Indicadores científicos: aspectos teóricos y metodológicos e impactos en la política científica. In: Martínez E, Albornoz M, organizadores. Indicadores de ciencia y tecnología: estado del arte y perspectivas. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad; 1998. p. 23-51.

Mirowski P. Re-engineering scientific credit in the era of globalized information economy. First Monday 2001; 6(1). http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue6_12/mirowski/ (acessado em 12/Jun/2006).

Patsopoulos NA, Ioannidis JPA, Analatos AA. Origin and funding of the most frequently cited papers in medicine: database analysis. BMJ 2006;332:1061-4.

Mirowski P, van Horn R. The contract research organization and the commercialization of science. Soc Stud Sci 2005; 35:503-48.

Porta M, Copete JL, Fernandez E, Alguacil J, Murillo J. Mixing journal, article, and author citations, and other pitfalls in the bibliographic impact factor. Cad Saúde Pública 2003;19:1847-62.

Martin B. Dissent and heresy in medicine: models, methods and strategies. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 713-25.

Fernández E, Plasencia A. Contamos contigo: ¿contamos también con tus citas? Gac Sanit 2002; 16:288-90.

Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific. Essential science indicators. http://incites.com/rsg/esi/ (accessed 01/Jun/2006).

Latour B. Woolgar S. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton:Princeton University Press; 1986.

McSherry C. Who owns academic work? Battling for control of intellectual property. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2001.

Peter I. The beginnings of the Internet. http://www.nethistory.info/History%20of%20the%20Internet/beginnings.html (accessed 31/Mai/2006).

Alvarenga L. Bibliometria e arqueologia do saber de Michel Foucault: traços de identidade teórico/metodológica. Ciênc Inf 1998; 27:253-61.

Bauman Z. Wasted lives: modernity and its outcasts. London: Blackwell Publishing; 2004.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS