How Do We Measure Use of Scientific Journals? A Note on Research Methodologies

Galyani Moghaddam, Golnessa and Moballeghi, Mostafa How Do We Measure Use of Scientific Journals? A Note on Research Methodologies. Scientometrics, 2008, vol. 76, n. 1, pp. 125-133. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[img] PDF

Download (79kB)

English abstract

Scientific journals represent a significant and growing part of the libraries and many researchers have attempted to measure their use by various methodological approaches till date. In this paper, the author reviews the methodologies employed by researchers working on scientific journals usage. It aims to present an overall picture of the research methods used in the area, in a way that will be of value to anyone seeking to study scientific journals. The author reviews four main research methodologies which are being used for profiling scientific journals usage including questionnaire, interview, citation analysis and transaction log analysis.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: Scientific Journals, Journal Usage, Research Methodology
Subjects: H. Information sources, supports, channels. > HN. e-journals.
B. Information use and sociology of information > BB. Bibliometric methods
Depositing user: Golnessa Galyani Moghaddam
Date deposited: 28 Sep 2008
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:12


COVEY, D.T. (2002), Usability and usability assessment: library practices and concerns, Council on Library and Information Resources, Available at: pub105/pub105.pdf (accessed July 11, 2007).

FRIEMAN, J., BUTLER, E. (1976, Spring), Some sources of interviewer variance in surveys, Public Opinion Quarterly: 79-81.

HOEFFEL, C. (1988), Journal impact factors [letter]. Allergy, 53:1225.

INGWERSEN, P. (1998), Web impact factors, Journal of Documentation, 54 (2): 236–243.

JAMALI, H.R., NICHOLAS, D., HUNTINGTON, P. (2005), The use and users of scholarly e-journals: a review of log analysis studies, Aslib Proceedings, 57(6): 554–71.

KACMAR, K.M., AND WHITFIELD, J.M. (2000), An additional rating method for journal articles in the field of management. Organizational Research Methods, 3: 392-406.

KOROBKIN, R. (1999), Ranking journals: some thoughts on theory and methodology, Florida State University Law Review, 26: 851-876.

KURTH, M. (1993), The limits and limitations of transaction log analysis, Library Hi Tech, 11(2): 98-104.

MAREK, K., VALAUSKAS, E.J. (2002), Web logs as indices of electronic journal use: tools for identifying a ‘classic’ article. Libri, 52 (4): 220–230.

McLEAN, N. (1998), The archiving of electronic scholarly information: executive summary, Available at: (Accessed January 4, 2007).

McWILLIAMS, A., SIEGEL, D., VAN FLEET, D.D. (2005, April) Scholarly journals as producers of knowledge: theory and empirical evidence based on data envelopment analysis, Organizational Research Methods, 18(2): 185-102.

NICHOLAS, D., HUNTINGTON, P., LIEVESLEY, N. AND WASTI, A. (2000), Evaluating consumer web site logs: a case study of The Times/The Sunday Times web site, Journal of Information Science, 26(6): 399-411.

NICHOLAS, D., HUNTINGTON, P. AND WILLIAMS, P. (2001), Establishing metrics for the evaluation of touch screen kiosks, Journal of Information Science, 27(2): 61-71.

NICHOLAS, D. AND HUNTINGTON, P. (2003), Micro-mining and segmented log file analysis: a method for enriching the data yield from internet log files, Journal of Information Science, 29(5): 391-404.

NICHOLAS, D., HUNTINGTON, P. AND WATKINSON, A. (2005), Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis, Journal of Documentation, 61(2): 246-80.

SMITH, A.G. (2005), Citations and links as a measure of effectiveness of online LIS journals, IFLA Journal, 31(1): 76–84.

ROUSSEAU, R. (2002) Journal evaluation: technical and practical issues, Library Trends, 50: 418-439.

ZIKMUND, W.G. (2003), Business Research Methods, Thomson Learning, Inc., Eastern Press, Bangalore.


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item