Come si valuta la qualità nella Repubblica della Scienza? Una riflessione sul concetto di peer review

Johns A., The Nature of the Book. Print and Knowledge in the Making, Chicago University Press, Chicago 1998;

Biagioli M., "From Book Censorship to Academic Peer Review", Emergences, Vol. 12, No. 1 (2002), pp. 11-45.

Shapin S., A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England, Chicago University Press, Chicago 1994;

Goldgar A., Impolite Learning. Conduct and Community in the Republic of Letters 1680-1750, Yale University Press, New Haven and London 1995.

Polanyi M., The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory, Minerva 1:54-74, 1962 http://www.missouriwestern.edu/orgs/polanyi/mp-repsc.htm.

Morris S., “The true costs of scholarly journal publishing”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 18, No. 2. (January 2005), pp. 115-126.

Hirschauer, “Die Innenwelt des peer review. Qualitätszuschreibung und informelle Wissenschaftskommunikation in Fachzeitschriften”, Expertise zum Thema für das BMBF (Bildungsministerium für Bildung und Forschung), 2002,

http://www.sciencepolicystudies.de/Prexpert-hirschauer.pdf

Ziman J., “Is science losing its Objectivity?”, Nature, 382, 1996 pp. 751-54.

F. Rowland, “The peer-review process”, Learned Publishing 15 (2002), no. 4;

G. McKiernan, “Alternative peer review: Quality management for 21st century scholarship”, in Peer review in the Age of Open Archives,

http://www.public.iastate.edu/~gerrymck/APR-1.ppt;

A. Williamson, “What will happen to peer review?”, Learned Publishing 16 (2003); U. Poeschl, “Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance”, Learned Publishing 17 (2004);

L. Grivell, “Through a glass darkly. the present and the future of editorial peer review”, EMBO, reports 7 (2006), no. 6.

Dall'Aglio P., “Peer review and journal models”, ArXiv, 31 august 2006

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608307.

Vitiello G., “Il mercato delle riviste in Scienze umane e sociali in Italia: Analisi quantitativa e sua evoluzione in ambito elettronico”, Biblioteche oggi 2005 23 (1) pp. 56-67;

Working Party on the Information Economy. Digital Broadband Content: Scientific Publishing

http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/42/12/35393145.pdf

Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe,

http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf

Guedon J-C., x“La lunga ombra di Oldenburg: i bibliotecari, i ricercatori, gli editori e il controllo dell'editoria scientifica”, Bollettino telematico di filosofia politica, 2004, http://purl.org/hj/bfp/51

Di Donato F., Conoscenza e pubblicità del sapere. Le condizioni della repubblica scientifica a partire dall'Architettonica della ragion pura di Kant, BtFP, 2005

http://bfp.sp.unipi.it/dida/arch/).

Berners-Lee T., Design Issues. Architectural and philosophical points, online all'URL http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/.

Berners-Lee T., The World Wide Web - Past, present, future. Exploring Universality, 2004, online all'URL http://www.w3.org/2002/04/Japan/Lecture.html

Di Donato F., Web semantico: breve linkografia ragionata, aprile 2005, documento autoarchiviato e disponibile all'URL http://bfp.sp.unipi.it/~didonato/ovre/telema/ws.html.

Barbera M., Humanities and Semantic Web. L'autore e il ricercatore nell'ambiente digitale, Padova, giugno 2007

http://www.presentations.barbz.org/padova07/

Anderson C., “Technical solutions: Wisdom of the crowds”, Nature (2006) http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04992.html.

Bollen J., Rodriguez M., Van de Sompel H., “Journal Status”, Scientometrics, vol. 69, no. 3, December 2006; Preprint online: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0601030.

Rodriguez M., Bollen J., Van de Sompel H., “The convergence of Digital Libraries and the Peer-Review Process”, Journal of Information Science, 2005 (Preprint at arXiv:cs.DL/0504084).

Greaves J. et al, “Nature's Trial of open peer review”; Sandewall E., “Opening up the process. A hybrid system of peer review”; Koop T., Pöschl U., “An open, two-stage peer-review journal”; Koonin E., Landweber L., Lipman D. and Dignon R., “Reviving a culture of scientific debate”; Groves T., “How can we get the best out of peer review? A recipe for good peer review” (Online on Nature(2006): http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/index.html).

Akerman R., “Evolving peer review for the internet”, Nature (2006), http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04997.html.

Roosendaal H.E., Geurts P., “Forces and functions in scientific communication: an analysis of their interplay”, in Karttunen M., Holmlund K., Hilf E. (a cura di), CRISP 97, Cooperative Research Information Systems in Physics, 1997 online all'URL: http://www.physik.uni-oldenburg.de/conferences/crisp97/roosendaal.html.

Dario Taraborelli, “Soft peer review? Social software and distributed scientific evaluation”, Academic productivity, 2007, online all'URL http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/soft-peer-review-social-software-and-distributed-scientific-evaluation/.

Coen L., “An Academic's Perspective: Social Software and New Opportunities for peer review”, Library2.0, 2007,http://liblogs.albany.edu/library20/2007/02/social_software_and_new_opport.html

Bollen J., Van de Sompel H., Smith J.A., Luce R., “Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 41, No. 6., December 2005, pp. 1419-1440.

Giles L.C., Councill I.G., “Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientificcontributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing”, PNAS, Vol. 101, No. 51. (21 December 2004), pp. 17599-17604, online all'URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15601767.

Woodmansee M., “The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the ‘Author’”, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Vol. 17, n. 4, 1984, 425-448,

http://www.compilerpress.atfreeweb.com/Anno%20Woodmansee%20Genius%20&%20Copyright.htm.

Sprat T., History of the Royal Society, Martyn, London 1667; Birch T., The History of the Royal Society of London (1756), reprinted Johnson, New York 1968.

Di Donato F., “Università, scienza e politica nel Conflitto delle facoltà”, Bollettino telematico di Filosofia Politica 2006, online all'URL: http://bfp.sp.unipi.it/dida/streit/ar01s04.html

Dooley B., Baron S. (a cura di), The Politics of Information in Early Modern Europe, New York, Routledge 2001.

Ryder M., Print vs. Online Scholarly Publishing: Notes and reflections on the peer review process, 1997, http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/aect_97.html.

Harnad S., “Implementing peer review on the Net: Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals”, In Peek, R. & Newby, G. (a cura di) Scholarly Publication: The Electronic Frontier, Cambridge MA, MIT Press, 1996 pp. 103-108.

Harnad S., “Learned Inquiry and the Net: The Role of peer review, Peer Commentary and Copyright”, Learned Publishing 11 n. 4, 1997, pp. 283-292;

Harnad S., The Invisible Hand of peer review; Harnad S., Hemus M., The Impact of Electronic Publishing on the Academic Community. Session 1: The present situation and the likely future. All or none: no stable hybrid or half-way solutions for launching the learned periodical literature into the post-Gutenberg galaxy homepage, all'URL http://www.crm.umontreal.ca/~harnad/.