Information retrieval in MEDLINE®: Searching for literature about critical care

Pestana, Olívia Information retrieval in MEDLINE®: Searching for literature about critical care., 2008 . In 17th annual BOBCATSSS symposium (Bobcatsss 2009), Porto (Portugal), 28-30 January 2009. (Unpublished) [Conference paper]

[img]
Preview
 PDF
58.pdf
Download (67kB) | Preview

English abstract

More than ever, update of knowledge and decision making in health care are based on the use of recent scientific information. The effects of the information society’s technological transformation are visible in the most frequent options of clinicians, being common the use of databases, in order to keep pace with the rapid growth of scientific publications. The most frequently used database is MEDLINE. Thus, in order to understand its functioning, especially related to subject searching, the way information is represented and the possible forms of retrieval will be analyzed. In this context, a study carried out to get update information about subject information retrieval will be presented in the detail. The results are interpreted based on recognized effectiveness measures of evaluating information systems.

Item type: Conference paper
Keywords: MEDLINE, information retrieval, critical care
Subjects: I. Information treatment for information services > ID. Knowledge representation.
B. Information use and sociology of information
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: 2009 Bobcatsss
Date deposited: 02 Apr 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:14
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/12954

References

HAUPT, MT., et al. Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a a system of categorization of three levels of care. Critical Care Medicine, 2003, vol. 31, no. 11, p. 2677-2683.

HAYNES, RB., et al. Performances of 27 MEDLINE systems tested by searches with clinical questions. BOBCATSSS 2009 Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994, vol. 1, no. 3, p. 285-295.

HAYNES, RB., et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from MEDLINE: analytical survey. British Medical Journal, 2005, vol. 330, no. 7501, p. 1179-1182.

HAYNES, RB., WILCZYNSKI, NL. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from MEDLINE: analytical survey. British Medical Journal, 2004, vol. 328, no. 7447, p. 1040-1042.

LANCASTER, F.W. Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system. JAMA, 1969, vol. 207, no. 1, p. 114-120.

LANCASTER, F.W. MEDLARS: Report on the evaluation of its operating efficiency. American Documentation, 1969, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 119-142.

MONTORI, VM., et al. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from MEDLINE: analytical survey. British Medical Journal, 2005, vol. 330, no. 7482, p. 68-71.

NAHIN, AM. Boost for PubMed® search results: New ATM & citation sensor introduced. NLM Technical Bulletin [online]. 2008, no. 362 [cited 2008-10-30], e10. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/mj08/mj08_pubmed_atm_cite_sensor.html>. ISSN 0146-3055.

PORTUGAL. Ministério da Saúde. Cuidados Intensivos. Recomendações para o seu desenvolvimento. Lisboa : Direcção-Geral da Saúde, 2003. ISBN 972-675-097-0.

SAHA, S., SAINT, S., CHRISTAKIS, DA. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 2003, vol. 91, no. 1, p. 42-46.

SEGLEN, PO. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 1997, vol. 314, no. 7079, p. 498-502.

U.S. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE®. Fact sheet: What is the difference between MEDLINE® and PubMed®? [online]. Bethesda : NLM, 10 July 2002, reviewed 22 April 2008. [cited 2008-10-30]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.html>.

U.S. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE®. Fact sheet: MEDLINE® [online]. Bethesda : NLM, 17 November 2004, reviewed 22 April 2008. [cited 2008-10-30]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html>.

U.S. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE®. NLM® Training: PubMed® [online]. Bethesda : NLM, October 2008 revision. [cited 2008-10-30]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/manuals/pm_workbook.pdf>.

WILCZYNSKI, NL., et al. An overview of the design and methods for retrieving high-quality studies for clinical care. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making [online]. 2005, vol. 5, [cited 2008-10-30]. Available from World Wide Web: <http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/5/20>. ISSN 1472-6947.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS