University Scholarly Knowledge Inventory System: A Workflow System for Institutional Repositories

Morrow, Anne and Mower, Allyson University Scholarly Knowledge Inventory System: A Workflow System for Institutional Repositories. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2009, vol. 47, n. 3 & 4, pp. 286-296. [Journal article (Paginated)]

[thumbnail of 910230038.pdf]
Preview
 PDF
910230038.pdf
Download (2MB) | Preview

English abstract

The University Scholarly Knowledge Inventory System (U-SKIS) provides workspace for institutional repository staff. U-SKIS tracks files, communications, and publishers' archiving policies to determine what may be added to a repository. A team at the University of Utah developed the system as part of a strategy to gather previously published peer-reviewed articles. As campus outreach programs developed, coordinators quickly amassed thousands of journal articles requiring copyright research and permission. This article describes the creation of U-SKIS, addresses the educational role U-SKIS plays in the scholarly communication arena, and explores the implications of implementing scalable workflow systems for other digital collections.

Item type: Journal article (Paginated)
Keywords: digital repositories; workflow management; copyright permissions; digital collections; collection development
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum.
L. Information technology and library technology
Depositing user: Allyson Mower
Date deposited: 05 May 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:14
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/13089

References

1. John F. Gantz, David Reinsel, Christopher Chute, Wolfgang Schlichting, John McArthur, Stephen Minton, Irida Xheneti, Anna Toncheva, and Alex Manfrediz, The Expanding Digital Universe: a forecast of worldwide information growth through 2010 (Framingham, MA: IDC, 2007),

http://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/expanding-digital-idc-white-paper.pdf.

2. Nancy Fried Foster and Susan Gibbons, “Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories,” D-Lib Magazine 11, no. 1 (2005), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html.

3. Joanna Barwick, “Building an Institutional Repository at Loughborough University: Some Experiences,” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 41, no. 2 (2007), http://hdl.handle.net/2134/2640.

4. Mary E. Piorun, Lisa A. Palmer, and James F. Comes, “Challenges and Lessons Learned: Moving From Image Database to Institutional Repository,” OCLC Systems & Services 23, no. 2 (2007), http://works.bepress.com/piorunm/3.

5. Peter Morgan, “Facilitating the Deposit of Experimental Chemistry Data in Institutional Repositories: Project SPECTRa” (paper presented at the annual meeting for the International Association of Technological University Libraries, Stockholm, Sweden, June 11–14, 2007). http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/195216.

6. Philip M. Davis and Matthew J.L. Connolly, “Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University’s Installation of DSpace,” D-Lib Magazine 13, no. 3/4 (2007), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.

7. Maurits van der Graaf, “DRIVER: Seven Items on a European Agenda for Digital Repositories,” Ariadne 52 (2007), http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue52/vandergraf/.

8. Dorothea Salo, “What You’re Up Against” (paper presented at the NISO/PALINET Conference, Washington, DC, December 3, 2007), http://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/22081.


Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Contact us
Send email Sponsors
Sponsor: AIMS Sponsor: D&P Sponsor: UniNa CAB Get connected
Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Linkedin LinkedIn RSS RSS