University Scholarly Knowledge Inventory System: A Workflow System for Institutional Repositories

Morrow, Anne and Mower, Allyson University Scholarly Knowledge Inventory System: A Workflow System for Institutional Repositories. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2009, vol. 47, n. 3 & 4, pp. 286-296. [Journal article (Print/Paginated)]

[img]
Preview
PDF
910230038.pdf

Download (1969Kb) | Preview

English abstract

The University Scholarly Knowledge Inventory System (U-SKIS) provides workspace for institutional repository staff. U-SKIS tracks files, communications, and publishers' archiving policies to determine what may be added to a repository. A team at the University of Utah developed the system as part of a strategy to gather previously published peer-reviewed articles. As campus outreach programs developed, coordinators quickly amassed thousands of journal articles requiring copyright research and permission. This article describes the creation of U-SKIS, addresses the educational role U-SKIS plays in the scholarly communication arena, and explores the implications of implementing scalable workflow systems for other digital collections.

Item type: Journal article (Print/Paginated)
Keywords: digital repositories; workflow management; copyright permissions; digital collections; collection development
Subjects: E. Publishing and legal issues.
J. Technical services in libraries, archives, museum.
L. Information technology and library technology.
Depositing user: Allyson Mower
Date deposited: 05 May 2009
Last modified: 02 Oct 2014 12:14
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10760/13089

References

"SEEK" links will first look for possible matches inside E-LIS and query Google Scholar if no results are found.

1. John F. Gantz, David Reinsel, Christopher Chute, Wolfgang Schlichting, John McArthur, Stephen Minton, Irida Xheneti, Anna Toncheva, and Alex Manfrediz, The Expanding Digital Universe: a forecast of worldwide information growth through 2010 (Framingham, MA: IDC, 2007),

http://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/expanding-digital-idc-white-paper.pdf.

2. Nancy Fried Foster and Susan Gibbons, “Understanding Faculty to Improve Content Recruitment for Institutional Repositories,” D-Lib Magazine 11, no. 1 (2005), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html.

3. Joanna Barwick, “Building an Institutional Repository at Loughborough University: Some Experiences,” Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 41, no. 2 (2007), http://hdl.handle.net/2134/2640.

4. Mary E. Piorun, Lisa A. Palmer, and James F. Comes, “Challenges and Lessons Learned: Moving From Image Database to Institutional Repository,” OCLC Systems & Services 23, no. 2 (2007), http://works.bepress.com/piorunm/3.

5. Peter Morgan, “Facilitating the Deposit of Experimental Chemistry Data in Institutional Repositories: Project SPECTRa” (paper presented at the annual meeting for the International Association of Technological University Libraries, Stockholm, Sweden, June 11–14, 2007). http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/195216.

6. Philip M. Davis and Matthew J.L. Connolly, “Institutional Repositories: Evaluating the Reasons for Non-use of Cornell University’s Installation of DSpace,” D-Lib Magazine 13, no. 3/4 (2007), http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html.

7. Maurits van der Graaf, “DRIVER: Seven Items on a European Agenda for Digital Repositories,” Ariadne 52 (2007), http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue52/vandergraf/.

8. Dorothea Salo, “What You’re Up Against” (paper presented at the NISO/PALINET Conference, Washington, DC, December 3, 2007), http://minds.wisconsin.edu/handle/1793/22081.


Actions (login required)

View Item View Item