Information-seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers

Brown, C.M. (1999a), “Information literacy of physical science graduate students in the information age”, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 60 No. 5, pp. 426-438.

Brown, C.M. (1999b), “Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 50 No. 10, pp. 929-943.

Cho, A. (2000), “Distorted galaxies point to dark matter”, Science, Vol. 287 No. 5460, pp. 1899-1901.

Ellis, D., Cox, D. and Hall, K. (1993), “A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 49 No. 4, pp. 356-369.

Fry, J. (2003), The Cultural Shaping of Scholarly Communication within Academic Specialisms, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Brighton, Brighton.

Gobo, G. (2004), “Sampling, representativeness and generalizability”, in Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F. and Silverman, D. (Eds), Qualitative Research Practice, Sage, London, pp. 435-456.

Gould, C.C. and Pearce, K. (1991), Information Needs in the Sciences: An Assessment, Research Library Group, Mountain View, California.

Hemminger, B.M., Lu, D., Vaughan, K.T.L. and Adams, S.J. (2007), “Information seeking behavior of academic scientists”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54 No. 14, pp. 2205-2225.

Huntington, P., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H.R. and Tenopir, C. (2006), “Article decay in the digital environment: a usage analysis by date of publication employing deep log methods”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 57 No. 13, pp. 1840-1851.

Jamali, H.R. (2008), Information-seeking behaviour of physicists and astronomers: an intradisciplinary study, unpublished PhD thesis, University College London, London.

Kling, R. and McKim, G. (2000), “Not just a matter of time: field differences in the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 51 No. 14, pp. 1306-1320.

Lawal, I. (2002), “Scholarly communication: the use and non-use of e-print archives for the dissemination of scientific information, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, Vol. 36, available at: http://www.istl.org/02-fall/index.html (accessed 25 November 2007).

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Dobrowolski, T., Rowlands, I., Jamali, H.R. and Polydoratou, P. (2005b), “Revisiting 'obsolescence' and journal article 'decay' through usage data: an analysis of digital journal use by year of publication”, Information Processing & Management, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 1441-1461.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Jamali, H.R. (2006), “Authors as users: a deep log analysis linking demographic and attitudinal data obtained from scholarly authors with their usage of ScienceDirect”, Ciber, University College London, London.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Rowlands, I., Jamali, H.R. and Haynes, J. (2005a), “An investigation of physicists' information-seeking behaviour, publishing practices, and views on the scholarly publishing system: with special reference to the Institute of Physics and its journals”, report of an international survey”, CIBER, University College London, London.

Royal Society (1948), Royal Society Scientific Information Conference, London.

Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. (2002), “Reading behaviour and electronic journals”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 259-265.

Wertman, E.R. (1999), Electronic Preprint Distribution: A Case Study of Physicists and Chemists at the University of Maryland, unpublished MSc thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VI.